Sentences with phrase «harmed by enforcement»

The agreement may fall under the covenant - not - to - sue rubric, but covenants not to sue are only enforceable «if the interest in its enforcement is outweighed in the circumstances by a public policy harmed by enforcement of the agreement.»

Not exact matches

In addition, it is possible that future orders issued by, or enforcement actions initiated by, regulatory authorities could cause us to incur substantial costs or require us to change our business practices in a way that could seriously harm our business.

consumer and social harm without detection and enforcement by regulatory or police authorities.

Bolt's report notes that immigration enforcement's latest business model aims to reduce the «harm» caused by undocumented migrants.

Specially - trained police animals, particularly dogs and horses, are often put in harm's way when they are relied upon by law enforcement to keep New Yorkers safe.

Under the proposed measure, family members or law enforcement could petition a court for «Extreme Risk Protection Orders,» which, if granted, would allow officers to temporarily confiscate firearms and prevent the purchase of additional weapons by those deemed at risk of causing harm to themselves or others.

5/17/2007 Tests Show Healthy Humans Not Harmed By Taser Using a Taser to control agitated suspects in police custody is standard operating procedure for many law enforcement agencies.

«Expecting to solve public health problems by enforcement - led policies can lead to a downward spiral of increased harm and ultimately death.

Due to the severity, consequences for acts of bullying which involve physical harm, stalking, emotional distress or damage to personal property will be dealt with on a case by case by administration and may involve law enforcement.

The States, however, submit that the comprehensive bright line approach reflected in the proposed rules would substantially aid law enforcement agencies in addressing the harms that have been caused to consumers by unscrupulous practices in the debt relief industry.

South Carolina now allows a judge to issue a protective order that prohibits the harm or harassment against any pet animal owned, possessed, kept, or held by the petitioner; any family or household member designated in the order; or the respondent if the petitioner has a demonstrated interest in the pet animal.The law also allows the judge to issue a protective order that provides for temporary possession of the personal property, including pet animals, of the parties and order assistance from law enforcement officers in removing personal property of the petitioner if the respondent's eviction has not been ordered.

Emotions of anxiety, exhilaration, and fear can be high at times, especially when being pursued by law enforcement or characters trying to harm the current character.

But the robots are too good at their jobs: they interpret their directive by travelling from world to world (and eventually Earth) to enforce happiness: replacing humans in every endeavour, lobotomizing those who object and «seem unhappy,» and eventually subjugating all of humanity — not through malice, but through the efficient mechanical enforcement of «guarding from harm.»

As a result, the plaintiffs, residents of rural Ecuador harmed by the defendant Chevron's pollution in the Lago Agrio region, can seek enforcement of a judgment of an Ecuadorian court in Ontario.

The severity of the charges will depend on your blood alcohol level (BAC), prior DUI offenses, cooperation with law enforcement, and the degree of harm suffered by any victims.

Accordingly, the Parties each agree and acknowledge that any such violation or threatened violation may cause irreparable injury to the Disclosing Party and that, in addition to any other remedies that may be available, in law, in equity, or otherwise, the Disclosing Party shall be entitled (a) to seek injunctive relief against the threatened breach of this Agreement or the continuation of any such breach by the Receiving Party, without the necessity of proving actual damages, and (b) to be indemnified by the Receiving Party from any loss or harm, including but not limited to attorney's fees, arising out of or in connection with any breach or enforcement of the Receiving Party's obligations under this Agreement or the unauthorized use or disclosure of the Disclosing Party's Confidential Information.

The NPRM would have allowed covered entities to disclose protected health information about a victim of a crime, abuse or other harm to a law enforcement official, if the law enforcement official represented that: (i) The information was needed to determine whether a violation of law by a person other than the victim had occurred; and (ii) immediate law enforcement activity that depended on obtaining the information may have been necessary.

[31] Google argues, rather, that it will suffer irreparable harm as a result of the precedent established by the granting and enforcement of the injunction.

Comment: One commenter questioned under what circumstances proposed § 164.510 (k) would apply instead of proposed § 164.510 (f)(5), «Urgent Circumstances,» which permitted covered entities to disclose protected health information to law enforcement officials about individuals who are or are suspected to be victims of a crime, abuse, or other harm, if the law enforcement official represents that the information is needed to determine whether a violation of law by a person other than the victim has occurred and immediate law enforcement activity that depends upon obtaining such information may be necessary.

Third, this paragraph allows covered entities to disclose protected health information about an individual without the individual's agreement if the disclosure is expressly authorized by statute or regulation and either: (1) The covered entity, in the exercise of its professional judgment, believes that the disclosure is necessary to prevent serious harm to the individual or to other potential victims; or (2) if the individual is unable to agree due to incapacity, a law enforcement or other public official authorized to received the report represents that the protected health information for which disclosure is sought is not intended to be used against the individual, and that an immediate enforcement activity that depends on the disclosure would be materially and adversely affected by waiting until the individual is able to agree to the disclosure.

The plaintiff brought a motion to lift the stay and for declarations that the stay did not operate with respect to enforcement of judgment, that the judgment was an award of damages for bodily harm intentionally inflicted pursuant to s. 178 (1)(a. 1) of the BIA, and that the judgment survived bankruptcy and was not a debt released by order of discharge.

Unfortunately, the current regulatory environment — in particular regulation by enforcement without enough clear guidance on what is permissible — is harming healthy innovation in the U.S..

e) May harm, or interfere with, law enforcement activities and other investigative or regulatory functions of a body authorized by statute to perform such functions;