Sentences with phrase «harmed by the disclosure»

The House asks only for the names of the clients, and it is hard to see how they could be harmed by disclosure: a few have already been revealed in the media.

Clients harmed by the disclosure can sue for malpractice or violation of the duty of confidentiality.

Not exact matches

In Compliance with Laws: We may disclose your information to a third party: (a) if we believe that disclosure is reasonably necessary to comply with any applicable law, regulation, legal process, or governmental request; (b) to enforce our agreements and policies; (c) to protect the security or integrity of the Startup Grind Service; (d) to protect Startup Grind, our customers, or the public from harm or illegal activities; (e) to respond to an emergency which we believe in the good faith requires us to disclose information to assist in preventing the death or serious bodily injury of any person; or (f) as otherwise directed by you.

«What the United States said, and it appears in the open documents of this case, is that the disclosure of these documents by order of our courts would be «likely to result in serious damage to US national security and could harm existing intelligence information - sharing between our two governments»,» the foreign secretary said.

We will not be responsible for any harm which results from your disclosure, or authorisation of the disclosure of your password or from use by any person of your password to gain access to your Account or Account Name.

Before a single child's information is turned over to any 3rd party, policymakers should give assurance to parents and educators that no harm will come to Tennessee school children by adopting the following principles: The state and districts should be required to publish any and all existing data sharing agreements in printed and electronic form, and include a thorough explanation of its purpose and provisions, and make it available to parents and local school authorities statewide; The Department of Education should hold hearings throughout the state or testify before the legislature to explain any existing data agreement, and answer questions from the public or their representatives, obtain informed comment, and gauge public reaction; All parents should have the right to be notified of the impending disclosure of their children's data, and provide them with a right to consent or have the right to withhold their children's information from being shared; The state should have to define what rights families or individuals will have to obtain relief if harmed by improper use or release of their child's private information, including how claims can be made; and finally, any legislation must ensure that the privacy interest of public school children and their families are put above the interests of any 3rd Party and its agents and subsidiaries.

When the book that made him famous appeared in 2001 (disclosure: I was asked by Cambridge University Press to write a rejoinder to The Skeptical Environmentalist) he declared that climate change is not a serious problem — «On average, global warming is not going to harm the developing world», he said.

Actually, the speaker is referring to an action by the NY Attorney General demanding certain companies put disclosures in their investment materials about the future economic harms from global warming.

There are exceptions to this general rule when disclosure of the information by the provider of services to the child is reasonably calculated to result in serious harm to the child.

• The decision of whether or not to apply an exemption to disclosure under the Act will also be governed by the question of whether disclosure could reasonably expected to cause «probable harm» to a party like Merck.

The Court concluded that the plaintiffs» privacy should be maintained because a denial of their anonymity in the action would result in disclosure of the very information they seek to protect and thereby exacerbate the damage and / or risk of harm already caused by Health Canada's November 2013 mailing.

Unfortunately, this case does not engage in an interpretation of section 40 (1)(ee) of the FOIP Act, the provision allowing disclosure to avert the risk of harm to minors or of an imminent danger to any persons, which could be relied upon by public bodies in the social housing context where there are risks posed to health or safety due to domestic violence.

Accordingly, the Parties each agree and acknowledge that any such violation or threatened violation may cause irreparable injury to the Disclosing Party and that, in addition to any other remedies that may be available, in law, in equity, or otherwise, the Disclosing Party shall be entitled (a) to seek injunctive relief against the threatened breach of this Agreement or the continuation of any such breach by the Receiving Party, without the necessity of proving actual damages, and (b) to be indemnified by the Receiving Party from any loss or harm, including but not limited to attorney's fees, arising out of or in connection with any breach or enforcement of the Receiving Party's obligations under this Agreement or the unauthorized use or disclosure of the Disclosing Party's Confidential Information.

A good lawyer who abides by the Rules of Professional Conduct can not disclose any information about the business or affairs of his or her client except in very limited and specified circumstances, such as where there is an imminent risk of death or serious bodily harm, and disclosure is necessary to prevent the death or harm.

The law as it currently stands has weak annual reporting requirements from government agencies, does not provide much protection to Canadians from abusive treatment by foreign states, does not give the Privacy Commissioner order - making power, does not provide redress in cases involving harm, does not prevent over-collection of personal information, does not protect against surveillance where the data is not recorded, and does not feature security breach disclosure requirements.

Comment: Several commenters urged that the request for determination by the Secretary under proposed § 160.204 (a) be limited to cases where an exception is absolutely necessary, and that in making such a determination, the Secretary should be required to make a determination that the benefits of granting an exception outweigh the potential harm and risk of disclosure in violation of the regulation.

We have adopted the policy recommended by the National Association of Insurance Commissioners in the Health Information Policy Model Act (1998) as this best reflects the balance of the appropriate level of regulation of the industry compared with the need to protect individuals from harm that may result from inadvertent disclosure of information.

Third, this paragraph allows covered entities to disclose protected health information about an individual without the individual's agreement if the disclosure is expressly authorized by statute or regulation and either: (1) The covered entity, in the exercise of its professional judgment, believes that the disclosure is necessary to prevent serious harm to the individual or to other potential victims; or (2) if the individual is unable to agree due to incapacity, a law enforcement or other public official authorized to received the report represents that the protected health information for which disclosure is sought is not intended to be used against the individual, and that an immediate enforcement activity that depends on the disclosure would be materially and adversely affected by waiting until the individual is able to agree to the disclosure.

You agree not to post User Content that: (i) may create a risk of harm, loss, physical or mental injury, emotional distress, death, disability, disfigurement, or physical or mental illness to you, to any other person, or to any animal; (ii) may create a risk of any other loss or damage to any person or property; (iii) seeks to harm or exploit children by exposing them to inappropriate content, asking for personally identifiable details or otherwise; (iv) may constitute or contribute to a crime or tort; (v) contains any information or content that we deem to be unlawful, harmful, abusive, racially or ethnically offensive, defamatory, infringing, invasive of personal privacy or publicity rights, harassing, humiliating to other people (publicly or otherwise), libelous, threatening, profane, obscene, or otherwise objectionable; (vi) contains any information or content that is illegal (including, without limitation, the disclosure of insider information under securities law or of another party's trade secrets); (vii) contains any information or content that you do not have a right to make available under any law or under contractual or fiduciary relationships; or (viii) contains any information or content that you know is not correct and current.

Attorneys for the school board argued that the release of the video could compromise the school's security system, but Levenson ruled that «the potential harm to the current security system, at best, is outweighed by the strong public interest in disclosure.»

If you abide by the discovery and disclosure requirement, then no harm, no foul and no need to worry, about the message, is there?

The court also noted three considerations: (1) the gravity of the harm inflicted by non-disclosure; (2) the fairness of imposing a duty of discovery on the buyer as an alternative to compelling disclosure; and (3) its impact on the stability of contracts if rescission is permitted.

The Brokers argued that the Consumers had not suffered harm from the failure to make the disclosures required by the Ordinance because the Consumers had received notice about airport noise on the Island and so had a duty to make further inquiry.

Instead via partial, limited and implied definitions and disclosure both the public and the professional image of the best Calgary based REALTORS has been further harmed by people making decisions with no real world solutions being provided.