Hasn't the regime of
harmful testing mandates and punitive stakes perfectly set the stage for Trump to now push school choice and justify the ramming through of Betsy DeVos?
Not exact matches
These arguments are arranged around a set of themes: Federally
mandated test - score abuse; ineffective and misleading; educationaly
harmful; hurts children who most need help; bad tools for the wrong job; pushes school reform in the wrong direction; and real improvement needed and possible.
Unncessary
mandate: The Bush plan is an unnecessary and unhelpful federal
mandate that will have the effect of putting the weight of the federal government behind the overuse and misuse of standardized
tests, with educationally
harmful results.
And they should have the right, if they are not satisfied with the answers to their questions, to opt their children out of any
mandated standardized
testing that they believe is inappropriate or
harmful to their child.
The No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) has dramatically harmed our local schools with its over-emphasis on high - stakes
testing, narrowing of the curriculum, and punitive unfunded
mandates that have been especially
harmful to schools with high - needs student populations.
There are many other
harmful substances that are not commonly
tested for because they are not
mandated by law, he says.