Sentences with phrase «harms another person because»

To summarize, all of these six factors harm persons because they diminish the self - esteem of the man in the pew, treating him as an object rather than a subject.

Stealing obviously harms another person because it deprives them of their property.

Not exact matches

«Since then, I've met young girls at meet - and - greets, or I've run into people, and they're like, «that video actually made me reconsider killing myself, or made me stop self - harming, because I have an older sister and I would hate to put her through that,» or whatever it might be.

The reality is, if you're taking advice from these people early on, you're barking up the wrong tree, because that formal plan you're going to spend an inordinate amount of time putting together is going to do more harm than good.

People who are born without the ability to feel pain are miserable, because they don't know when they're harming themselves.

«So many people who love you feel so betrayed right now because they know the harm that Trump's policies cause, especially to people of color.

Some people claim that too much domain experience can actually harm you because you become cynical of all the things that can't be done — you've got the scars to prove it.

While the misuse and exploitation of information people share with companies does not constitute the type of «breach» or theft discussed in the previous chapter on security (because the information was not technically stolen), the potential for harm to individuals and to vulnerable categories of people is nonetheless very real.

It does not mean settling for what's second best because a group of people, the majority of which are not willing to make the ultimate sacrifice of putting themselves in harm's way for others, are thinking about themselves as individuals and putting that ahead of the majority best interests.

Of those, God told one to steal a car and go to Minnesota to receive divine blessings (stopped by police on the way); another was «told» to spend all her money on a plane ticket as there was a grant waiting for her in another state to go to college with (there wasn't, and she had to call relatives to rescue her); another was told to cut himself; another was told to harm people (but only avoided doing this because he called police and was put inpatient).

I hate it when people are harmed because of the religion of others.

Because of the sinfulness of the world at that time, and because the pagan religions did much more harm than good, it was necessary for some tribes of peoples to be destroyed by the Israelites at the command Because of the sinfulness of the world at that time, and because the pagan religions did much more harm than good, it was necessary for some tribes of peoples to be destroyed by the Israelites at the command because the pagan religions did much more harm than good, it was necessary for some tribes of peoples to be destroyed by the Israelites at the command of God.

In no country in the world is there individual freedom to murder or rob another person, because the other person is being harmed by your activity.

If atheists have any disdain for religion, it is because of all the harm religion does around the world and the inherent discrimination that we face every day by the likes of people, like you.

These horrible tragedies happen because people will not quit sinning and seeking to do evil, so it brings harm to others.

It is so obvious that: a) those held in slavery were human beings (a biological category); b) all humans are by nature persons (a philosophic category), that is, beings with inviolable worth that ought never be treated as means to an end; and c) the evil practice of slavery was not a private matter - the whole community is harmed because we are all communal beings by nature, in solidarity with those who are treated unjustly.

I can point to this as grounds for accusing the biblical deity of immoral behavior, e.g. I would not unnecessarily harm another person's other wise innocent children because I would not want anyone (mortal or deity) to unnecessarily harm my own children.

Your mind is closed and your message of hate is no better than a suicide bomb because you spread harm and fear to people who in no way deserve it.

Most people refrain from harming others because of their evolved empathy and reason.

Just because the Holy Spirit directs and leads one in a direction that is not the norm, just as Paul clearly related regarding his actions on this subject, does not make it a rule for everyone else, and much harm is done when people decide that everyone else must follow the unique road that the Holy Spirit has directed them down and declaring to be a sin what is clearly not a sin.

In fact, most believe that there is more harm in not having a building because of how they provide convenience for gathering, a social identity for the people, and a position of prominence in the community.

Lewis's picture suggests that our actions are important not only because they hurt or harm the neighbor, but also because — under grace — they form and shape the persons we are.

Elsewhere in the developing tradition limits were set on how such justified force might be used: certain classes of persons were normally to be treated as noncombatants and not to be harmed directly and intentionally in their persons or property, and lists were made of weapons not to be used because of their indiscriminate or especially deadly effect.

I'm for g.ay marriage, because I don't see any harm coming from it, and I think some people are better off divorcing than living miserable lives together, but I'm not for anything else on your list (adultery, lying, cheating, stealing).

I proposed that we should not let ourselves get sucked onto every ideological battleground, because even when motivated by love (like Peter) we often do more harm than good — and instead we need to be relentlessly focused on loving people in the way Jesus did.»

We've been threatened with physical harm because of who or what people thought we were.

People invent all sorts of reasons to do others harm, they have to because if just left with basic empathy and compassion no one would think it right to kill another human if they can put themselves in that other humans shoes.

What harm has come to you because people have faith in God and follow thier religious beliefs?

fishon — you may have misunderstood ttm's comment — we say «committed» to a mental institution ie they got sent there, to a hospital — because they cracked up — he's not saying the church is a mental institution, but once who's pressure can cause people mental harm.

I may appear «sensitive» to this issue because it is current and it is harming people I care about.

I think this is an improvement, but only because gay sex in itself doesn't harm people.

Because the «myth» - or more accurately, the group of people who believe the myth - is actively harming real people.

God may be our creator, but that doesn't give him the right to inflict people with harm just because it's what he / she wants to do.

Because people think it does exist and those people are causing harm to those of us who don't believe.

This is why people of science and reason hate the religious, because of the harm you do.

What is more evil / selfish: A person who inadvertently causes harm to many around him / her because they are so wrapped up in self they can not see / do not care about the pain they cause or someone who purposefully chooses to cause harm to one person because it brings them pleasure?

I started to self - harm my face because I had this deep - rooted belief I was not a good person, because I'd constantly received negative criticism.

Putting everyone who believes anything in one big category of loonies just because some people use their faith to do harm can not be justified and it serves no purpose other than creating animosity and bringing people further apart.

Personally, I think a lot of this ties into the tendency in some Christian circles to reduce morality to a system of laws that people must follow («It's wrong because God says it's wrong») rather than an empathy - based system («This is wrong because it harms other people»).

Also stubborn heretics need a harsher treatment because they harm innocent people and mislead them.

Because the connection is so direct, harming the earth also harms the people it sustains.

i wonder Yes, but I was also including how people are willing to shun members of their own family, consider them sinful, block people from their rights, hinder medical research that could save millions of lives, and a host of other things that cause harm to people because they were led to believe that it will increase their chances of living forever in bliss.

@Rainer, «Also stubborn heretics need a harsher treatment because they harm innocent people and mislead them.»

goodness i can't believe it people will still defend him.You know something when Giroud misses many chances like at Monaco i did not criticize him even based on that you know why?its because he has always not been clinical.The only way a team can improve is by indentifying its problems and solving them.Arsenal has Giroud as the main cf and Welbeck as backup to him.Giroud has done well scoring some goals some too important but collectively he does more harm than good.Do not use moments to judge a player judge him based on content.Giroud does not excel in many games than he excels in games.As a main cf you need to be consistent.I see people here saying Giroud can not dribble he cant do this he cant do that but its a bit crazy to criticize him for that because every player has his own style.Giroud limitations as a player costs arsenal and will cost us a lot.Most importantly his poor finishing which has cost us several times.Not good enough.His style of play is ok for us but a striker who can take on players and run behind defences very well would make us very strong and also should be clinical.For Welbeck he needs to works on his finishing and composure by doing the basic things right.He rushes infront of goal too much.For now he is just above average.However he can excel if he works on improving.Giroud and Welbeck will always be a pain in arsenal's neck for most part.Some will call me stupid but hey at least i want to analyze the problem.People may support Giroud or Welbeck to lead the line next season but as the saying goes if you fool me once shame on you but if you fool me twice shame on me.Will you let Giroud and Welbeck fool you again?

I have no problem with saying «I don't feel comfortable with CIO because it doesn't feel right to me», «it breaks my heart to see my baby crying», «it didn't work for us so we tried something else» but to imply that other people who do choose to use a method that is and has been endorsed by major medical groups are harming their children is kinda a jerk thing to do.

When parents and the community are ignorant of nutrition as so many people are, the child's health will suffer, precisely because our government allows food manufacturers to produce, market and sell entirely too much food that harms human health.

Being a little person is dangerous not only because of the medical conditions associated with most types of dwarfism, but also because things like starting a family have the potential to seriously harm both mom and baby.

These fifteen stories are unforgivable, because the people in these kids» lives who were meant to protect them ultimately caused them harm - all over bedtime battles.

The things that would be really important like household products that might cause harm, it gets lost in the shuffle because there's almost too much information... \ [Biotech foods \] have been used for 20 years in 29 countries and consumed by millions and millions of people including pregnant women and children over nearly two decades.»

Federal officials don't track how many people in the U.S. have been harmed, but a recent government study estimated 410,000 babies are born each year at risk for mercury poisoning because of high levels in their mothers» bodies.