How does it restrain
its harvesting of user data to put an end to this extended backlash, without sacrificing its revenue model?
As it wrestles with the controversy over Cambridge Analytica's improper
harvesting of user data, news has emerged that Facebook has blocked ad targeting by sexual orientation, meaning that companies and organizations will no longer be able to t... Read
Not exact matches
The company will begin bankruptcy proceedings, it said, after losing clients and facing mounting legal fees resulting from the scandal over reports the company
harvested personal
data about millions
of Facebook
users beginning in 2014.
The hearing will give lawmakers the chance to ask the Facebook CEO directly about the company's involvement in the improper
harvesting of data from an estimated 87 million
users by Cambridge Analytica, a
data analytics firm that worked for Donald Trump's 2016 presidential campaign.
Part
of the uproar over the Cambridge Analytica scandal has focused on the fact that the analysis firm was able to get
data on so many millions
of Facebook
users even though only 270,000 actually installed the app that
harvested the information.
Zuckerberg noted that Facebook changed its app platform in 2014, restricting the ability
of app developers to
harvest data on their
users» Facebook friends.
The UK - based
data analytics company was in the eye
of the storm for illegally
harvesting personal
data of 87 million Facebook
users.
In the name
of consumer trust, businesses are wise to be up front and open about the
user data they
harvest, as opposed to burying this information in fine print.
The
data mining firm Cambridge Analytica has been accused
of illegally
harvesting the
data of 50 million
users from Facebook which was allegedly used in political campaigns in 2016 US elections.
The company has been hit by negative headlines since a number
of media publications reported that the
data of millions
of users were improperly
harvested by controversial political analytics firm Cambridge Analytica.
It was Zuckerberg's job in the hearing to provide reassurance in the wake
of the news that political
data firm Cambridge Analytica
harvested information from more than 87 million Facebook
users to create voter profiles that were used by Donald Trump's presidential campaign.
The disclosure that the personal
data of up to 87 million Facebook
users was improperly
harvested by the consulting firm Cambridge Analytica has given privacy experts hope that the public will finally listen to them.
Over the weekend, after news broke that Cambridge Analytica had
harvested data on as many as 50 million Facebook
users, Facebook's communications team encouraged Mr. Stamos to tweet in defense
of the company, but only after it asked to approve Mr. Stamos's tweets, according to two people briefed on the incident.
Ted Cruz's presidential campaign is using psychological
data based on research spanning tens
of millions
of Facebook
users,
harvested largely without their permission, to boost his surging White House run and gain an edge over Donald Trump and other Republican rivals, the Guardian can reveal.»
Amid the crisis, one set
of voices remained notably absent: Facebook
users whose
data was
harvested.
Tens
of millions
of American Facebook
users had their
data harvested by Cambridge Analytica and a British - based researcher.
The Silicon Valley companies have been under scrutiny for months for the way they collect and use people's
data, with Facebook reeling from revelations that the political research firm Cambridge Analytica
harvested the personal information
of up to 87 million
of its
users.
This was Mr. Zuckerberg's first appearance before Congress, prompted by the revelation that Cambridge Analytica, a political consulting firm linked to the Trump campaign,
harvested the
data of an estimated 87 million Facebook
users to psychologically profile voters during the 2016 election.
The for - profit social media giant Facebook
harvests vast amounts
of data from each
of its two billion
users across the globe.
A pair
of blockbuster reports from the New York Times and the UK's Observer released Saturday explained the scope
of the problem: Cambridge Analytica collected the
data not only
of the approximately 270,000
users who agreed to take Kogan's personality quiz but also their friends, thus
harvesting information on tens
of millions
of people without their knowledge or permission.
Since reports
of Cambridge Analytica's massive
harvest of Facebook
user data surfaced last week, multiple media outlets have responded by reminding an agitated public that they do have options for deleting their Facebook accounts.
Here are @alexstamos now deleted tweets on the app Cambridge Analytica used to
harvest millions
of Facebook
users»
data.
Facebook has for months faced an uproar among
users whose complaints range from the spread
of fake news to the use
of the network to manipulate elections and the
harvesting of 50 million people's Facebook
data by the political consultancy Cambridge Analytica.
As the original creators
of the methodology that Cambridge Analytica ultimately poached, Kosinski, Stillwell, and the rest
of their research team failed to anticipate how the ability to
harvest millions
of samples
of user data might be manipulated or exploited once their methodology was made public.
The
data was acquired via a third - party app, and the company behind the app
harvested information not just from the
users of that app but also from the Facebook friends
of users.
The scandal in which Cambridge Analytica
harvested data from millions
of Facebook
users to craft and target advertising for Donald Trump's presidential campaign has provoked broad outrage.
Firefighting the raging privacy crisis, Zuckerberg has committed to conducting a historical audit
of every app that had access to «a large amount»
of user data around the time that Cambridge Analytica was able to
harvest so much
data.
A voter - profiling company was able to
harvest data of 50 million Facebook profiles even though only about 270,000
users agreed to hand over their information.
In the event, Chmieliauskas» suggestion to clone Kosinski's app led to CA's
data licensing relationship with Kogan, whose own personality test app — thisisyourdigitallife — was built bespoke for its project and successfully used to
harvest data on 50M + Facebook
users so CA could, in turn, build psychological profiles on millions
of American voters.
The
data was acquired and processed by Cambridge University professor Aleksandr Kogan whose personality quiz app, running on Facebook's platform in 2014, was able to
harvest personal
data on tens
of millions
of users (a subset
of which Kogan turned into psychological profiles for CA to use for targeting political messaging at US voters).
There's plenty
of other information
harvested from
users that Facebook also intentionally fails to divulge via «Download your
data».
Over the summer
of 2014 the app is downloaded by around 270,000 Facebook
users and ends up
harvesting personal information on as many as 87 million people — the vast majority
of whom would have not known or consented to
data being passed
Facebook finally suspended Cambridge Analytica from its platform last month — although the company has admitted it was made aware
of the allegations linking it with a quiz app that
harvested Facebook
users data since at least December 2015, when the Guardian published its first article on the story.
But its focus on transparency — making sure people know how and why
data will flow if they choose to click «I agree» — combined with supersized fines for major
data violations represents something
of an existential threat to ad tech processes that rely on pervasive background
harvesting of users» personal
data to be siphoned biofuel for their vast, proprietary microtargeting engines.
She said she believed the point
of the quizzes was to
harvest Facebook
user data.
The reports said the firm had secretly
harvested the
data of 50 million Facebook
users shared with it by Cambridge University scholar Aleksandr Kogan, who had built a personality test app.
A person familiar with the matter told the Journal the firm was losing clients and facing mounting legal fees in the wake
of revelations that it
harvested the
data of tens
of millions
of Facebook
users without their knowledge or permission.
With the recent report
of Facebook
user's
data being
harvested and used for information warfare, many people are looking to delete their accounts or at least their Facebook posts in order to have a clean slate.
During the House committee hearing on Wednesday, Zuckerberg claimed not to know what «shadow profiles» are, even though this term has been used for years to describe Facebook's collection
of data about people who don't use its services by
harvesting the inboxes and smartphone contacts
of active Facebook
users.
Earlier this month, Facebook upped its count
of the number
of people impacted, admitting that up to 87 million
users may have had their
data harvested.
On Sunday, the social network suspended CubeYou's account after the firm had
harvested millions
of users» personal
data through ostensibly innocuous personality quizzes.
[Cambridge Analytica]
harvested private information from the Facebook profiles
of more than 50 million
users without their permission, according to former Cambridge employees, associates and documents, making it one
of the largest
data leaks in the social network's history.
However, despite Wylie's dramatic claims that he and Cambridge «broke Facebook,» the
harvesting of such
data, even from
users» friends who didn't clearly consent, does seem to have been clearly allowed by Facebook at the time, and many app developers had similar practices.
The figures come as both consumers and advertisers are putting Facebook under greater scruntiny, amid claims the world's largest social network had the
data of 50 million
users harvested by third - party analytics company Cambridge Analytica.
The Information Commissioner's Office (ICO), which has been looking into the British firm's handling
of data harvested from millions
of Facebook
users, and raided its offices in March, said the inquiry would continue.
Concerns about Facebook's handling
of personal information have grown since the social network's admission in March that the
data of millions
of users was wrongly
harvested by political consultancy Cambridge Analytica.
Wyden continued, «As a result, the vast majority
of the tens
of millions
of users whose
data was collected by Spectre likely had no knowledge that their information was being
harvested by third parties.»
The Apple chief has also called for stronger
data privacy regulations in light
of the scandal, which saw the
data of 50 million Facebook
users improperly
harvested and used for political purposes.
Facebook did so in order to improve people's privacy in the wake
of allegations that political
data firm Cambridge Analytica
harvested the information
of some 80 million
users.
The move comes in the wake
of a Guardian and Observer investigation which alleged that in 2013 that academic Dr Aleksandr Kogan used a quiz app to
harvest the
data of 50 million
users, before passing it on to
data analytics firm Cambridge Analytica.