«As a company that is committed to the principle that everyone deserves to live without fear of discrimination simply for being who they are, becoming an employer in North Carolina, where members of our teams will not
have equal rights under the law, is simply untenable,» Schulman wrote in an open letter.
I got my civil rights so screw people who don't
have equal rights under the law.
humans
have equal rights under the law and the sooner you set aside the indoctrination of hate and seclusion you were taught as a child the better life will be for all.
Not exact matches
Equal Rights under the law
would ensure that no one religion's values get enshrined in our national laws, otherwise there
would be no reason to not make a law forcing everyone to attend church on Sundays.
In closing, America
has become a better and more just country in EVERY instance where it granted
equal rights under law to minority citizens.
due to some crazy religious beliefs out there in the world i.e. marrying off young children and marrying genetic kin, the government can't ever allow religion to dictate marriage policy, so
have your ceremonies and deny same - gender couples to marry in your church but bluntly stated your crying and foot - stomping will accomplish nothing, marriage isn't a religious thing it is a civil
rights and equality thing, thus if the religious win by denying same gender cuples their civil
rights to
equal treatment
under the law, then don't be surprised when others use those same grounds to deny you your
rights under the law.
but
under the law we
have equal rights.
Judge made the biggest mistake of his life to let that mosque to be built.and problem is that people will pay heavily for that decision.Islam is the source of problem, Koran is the source problem.They use our freedom of religion, they sneak in cities
under the name of peace and love then they strike hard, though other religions
have no
rights in their contries.Here is statement from Omar Ahmed chairman of the Board of council on America Islamic Relation:» Islam isn't in America to be
equal to any other faith, but to become dominant.The Quran should be the highest authority in America, and Islam the only accepted religion on earth «Does this sounds to you religionf peace, love and logic?or terrorist thresd for thr future?
What YOU propose is STILL marginalizing people, STILL denying them
equal civil
rights under the 14th, because you
have some weird idea of what «traditional» marriage is.
Whether it's Nature or it's a choice... since there is -0 - evidence that sincere loving moral gay individuals aren't hurting anyone, why
would you want to deny them
equal rights under the law?
All citizens must
have basic
rights to life and liberty, and political
rights to the vote and to
equal protection
under the law.
It doesn't
have the same,
equal, or special
rights under the law that supersede those of the woman carrying it.
They
have better than
equal rights in the U.S. Hell, they
have far better opportunity than blacks
have in Africa
under their own rulership.To the Dem party, blackness is a religion unto itself.
And
having been born, as persons
under the Constitution, they were entitled to at least the same
rights as people on death row — due process,
equal protection of the law.
Express your upset by talking about what you feel
under the anger, and what you need, rather than attacking your partner: «Getting the kids ready and out of the house always feels stressful to me... I
would like to brainstorm about how we can make the whole thing easier...
right now I feel very alone with it, like I
have to make it all happen... I
would love to feel like we are
equal partners in this.»
Section 15 (1) states: Every individual is
equal before and
under the law and
has the
right to
equal protection and
equal benefit of the law without discrimination and, in particular without discrimination based on race, national or ethnic origin, colour, religion, sex, age or mental or physical disability.
«Two years ago, New York became the largest state to enact marriage equality, and since then we
have seen a growing recognition across the country that all citizens deserve
equal rights under the law, regardless of sexual orientation,» Cuomo wrote.
Pressed on whether she feared what might happen to
equal rights under the Trump administration, she said: «I don't talk — I don't
have any comments on that.»
Referring to those who were detained at the airports, Cuomo reiterated what he said Sunday — that individuals
have rights to due process and
equal treatment
under the law and vowed that the state will help enforce the
rights of anyone detained and «victimized» by any policy of «that administration.»
In 2006, when the New York State Court of Appeals shamefully ruled that the Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender (LGBT) community did not
have equal protection
under the law in relation to Marriage Equality, I predicted that passing legislation to
right this wrong in the State Senate
would be a profound personal and sadly political battle.
You
have equal rights and
under Labour you will never be treated like second - class citizens.
«That piece of paper says that individuals
have rights, the
right to due process, the
right to
equal treatment
under the laws,» Mr. Cuomo said.
Plaintiffs allege that these statutes, which impinge students» fundamental
right to education and
have a disproportionate impact on low - income and minority students, violate their
equal protection
rights under the California Constitution.
The Federal
Equal Credit Opportunity Act also prohibits creditors from discriminating against credit applicants because the applicant
has in good faith exercised any
right under the Consumer Credit Protection Act.
The Federal
Equal Credit Opportunity Act prohibits creditors from discriminating against credit applicants on the basis of race, color, religion, national origin, sex, marital status, age (provided that the applicant
has the capacity to enter into a binding contract); because all or part of the applicant's income derives from any public assistance program; or because the applicant
has in good faith exercised any
right under the Consumer Credit Protection Act.
The Federal
Equal Credit Opportunity Act prohibits creditors from discriminating against credit applicants on the basis of race, color, religion, national origin, sex, marital status or age (provided the applicant
has the capacity to enter into the binding contract); because all or part of the applicant's income derives from any public assistance program; or because the applicant
has in good faith exercised any
right under the Consumer Credit Protection Act.
The federal
Equal Credit Opportunity Act prohibits creditors from discriminating against credit applicants on the basis of race, color, religion, national origin, sex, marital status, age (provided the applicant
has the capacity to enter into a binding contract); because all or part of the applicant's income derives from any public assistance program; or because the applicant
has in good faith exercised any
right under the Consumer Credit Protection Act.
The Federal
Equal Credit Opportunity Act prohibits creditors from discriminating against credit applicants on the basis of race, color, religion, national origin, sex, marital status, age (provided the applicant
has the capacity to enter into a binding contract); because all or part of the applicant's income derives from any public assistance program; or because the applicant
has in good faith exercised any
right under the Consumer Credit Protection Act.
The
Equal Credit Opportunity Act (ECOA) prohibits creditors from discriminating against credit applicants in any aspect of a credit transactions on the basis of race, color, religion, national origin, sex or marital status, or age; the fact that all or part of the applicant's income comes from any public assistance program; or the fact that the applicant
has in good faith exercised any
right under certain federal consumer credit protection laws.
Notice: The Federal
Equal Credit Opportunity Act prohibits creditors from discriminating against credit applicants on the basis of race, color, religion, national origin, sex, marital status, age (provided the applicant
has the capacity to enter into a binding contract); because all or part of the applicant's income derives from any public assistance program; or because the applicant
has in good faith exercised any
right under the Consumer Credit Protection Act.
Under the law they all
have varying degrees of
rights and they are not all
equal.
Every individual is
equal before and
under the law and
has the
right to the
equal protection and
equal benefit of the law without discrimination and, in particular, without discrimination based on race, national or ethnic origin, colour, religion, sex, age or mental or physical disability.
Therefore, the Applicants
had a
right under the Code to
equal treatment with respect to educational services, along with accommodation of their disability to the point of undue hardship.
One
would think that a «constitutional superpower» like Canada
would protect and defend the
equal rights of Her Majesty's Letters Patent (1947)
under our great Charter, eh?
According to the Irish authorities, the
right to retain worker status after
having worked for more than one year — granting the
right to reside and
equal treatment — was reserved exclusively for Union citizens working
under an employment contract.
or allow to Run Compensation Suit Simultaneously with suits file by Bank Officials
under ARTHA RIN ACT with
equal opportunity and
equal right so as to restore total accountability, which will be similar to DRT (Debt Recovery Tribunal of INDIA)(B)- Considering the Heavy loss and Damages of Government Registered and Identified SICK INDUSTRIES of 1992 & 1996 of Private Sector due to Negligence, Violation of Contract & Non-Banking Activities etc. of Bank Officials and Policy Maker & need 100 % Weaver of all type of Bank loan liabilities to minimize their heavy loss and damages to certain extent
under LIMITATION ACT (C)- The system of keeping mortgage of Land & Properties from the Owner of Industries by Bank or any Loan Giving Agencies as Securities are mostly responsible for Malpractices and ever growing Corruption, & Fraudulent Activities in Banking Sector, which are now proven matter and may kindly be completely abolished as a part of reform programs at earliest possible time to ESTABLISH ACCOUNTABILITY and Check Malpractices, Fraudulent Activities which are now growing by large in Banking Sector or in other Loan Giving Agencies upto root Levels (
D)-- All suits of Artha Rin Court may kindly be transferred to Civil Commercial Court abolishing SECTIONS 12, 12 (khan) 18 (2) & (3) 19, 20, 21, 34,40, 41, 42, 44, 47 and 50 of ARTHA RIN ACT -2003 for the end of Justice.
No purchaser
has any
right or remedy
under this section who fails within 15 days from receipt to accept an offer to repurchase for a price
equal to the full amount paid and interest.
The landmark judgment, P
v Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis [2017] UKSC 65, concerns the directly eff ective
right of police offi cers
under EU law to
have the principle of
equal treatment in relation to employment and working conditions applied to their circumstances.
The plaintiffs do not seek to interrupt the progress of improvements, but they ask to stay revolution; a revolution against the foundations on which property rests; a revolution which is attempted on the allegation of monopoly: we resist the clamor against legislative acts which
have vested rights in individuals, on principles of
equal justice to the state, and to those who hold those
rights under the provisions of the law.
Under the Ontario Human
Rights Code (Code), employers, unions, housing providers and service providers
have a legal duty to accommodate the needs of persons with disabilities to the point of undue hardship, to ensure that persons with disabilities
have equal opportunities, access and benefits.
We believe in the fundamental
right of all people, including the poor, the most vulnerable, and the hardest to reach, to
have equal access to justice
under the law.
Although
under Ontario family law both spouses
had an
equal right to possession of the matrimonial home, there are acknowledged exceptions; given the potential for violence and the fact the husband
had other accommodation, this case was one of them.
It guarantees that every individual is «
equal before and
under the law and
has the
right to
equal protection and
equal benefit of the law without discrimination, and in particular, without discrimination based on race, national or ethnic origin, colour, religion, sex, age or mental or physical disability».
All employer's, regardless of size,
have a legal duty to accommodate the needs of employee's who
have a disability and to give
equal access to employees who are protected
under the Ontario's Human
Rights Code.
Under this arrangement, regardless of physical custody, the parents
have an
equal right to make determinations about their child's future.
Fred convinced the Ohio Supreme court to put an end to the destruction and withholding of internal police investigative files, in Police Officers for
Equal Rights v. City of Columbus, and
has won numerous monetary awards and appellate decisions protecting and requiring the disclosure of records
under Ohio's public records laws.
Under the Ontario Human
Rights Code, every person
has a
right to «
equal treatment with respect to employment» without discrimination or harassment because of race, ancestry, place of origin, colour, ethnic origin, citizenship, creed, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, gender expression, age, record of offences, marital status, family status or disability... Read More
Where the Minister certifies by notice, published in the Canada Gazette, that any country that is not a treaty country grants or
has undertaken to grant, either by treaty, convention, agreement or law, to citizens of Canada, the benefit of copyright on substantially the same basis as to its own citizens or copyright protection substantially
equal to that conferred by this Act, the country shall, for the purpose of the
rights conferred by this Act, be treated as if it were a country to which this Act extends, and the Minister may give a certificate, notwithstanding that the remedies for enforcing the
rights, or the restrictions on the importation of copies of works,
under the law of such country, differ from those in this Act.
Since 1 October 2011, agency workers
have enjoyed
equal treatment
rights under the Agency Workers Regulations 2010 (AWR), the most significant of which — relating to basic working and employment conditions, including pay — ...
If the lease extension is successfully obtained, you
have the legal
right to be granted a new lease with a term
equal to the remainder of the term
under your existing lease plus a further 90 years.