Sentences with phrase «has some valid points in»

I think I have a valid point in there somewhere, but I'm too sleepy to explain it clearly.

Not exact matches

«We accept that Iranian behavior has been disruptive in the region, we accept the president has some valid points that need to be addressed, but we believe they are capable of being addressed (inside the deal),» said Johnson.

That's a valid concern, but it's worth pointing out that since its recent low of $ 26 a barrel in February 2016, the oil price has surged nearly 150 percent — all while the number of active wells in North America has risen.

I meant to state that this is a reply to another article, but it has several very valid points in relation to several discussions here and religion in general.

Most agnostics and atheists were in your shoes, have studied the bible and more importantly the history behind it's composition but at some point most realized that the reason for the current focus of worship was no more valid than worshiping any other god.

In fact you know full well I and others here have made several valid points you've deliberately ignored because you don't have the integrity to acknowledge it when someone else has refuted your horribly flawed logic.

In fact, I appreciate the fact the implication that you know I had a valid point.

And like with Sian above, I fear that in doing so, you have missed valid points made and explained about the misogynistic patronising of women, manipulation of women's feelings and lying to women.

To disagree would mean they have a valid point that a logical person could possibly agree with in the first place!

Hand you been a man, and engaged in keeping with your desire I would have expressed fear that the valid points made in the comment challenging the «feminist approach» had been overlooked and critiqued your deference to the dominant ideology with the victim narrative, challenging what you want to «urge» me to do.

You never once brought any point that would exclude humans from being animals... not one valid point, but you did secure you place in the ignorance hall of fame.

@Chuckles, You may have valid points about the motivations of US entry into WWII and perhaps «save the Jews» wasn't the war cry of the Allies, but the end result is that the US and the Allies were in the war to stop the Nazis from carrying out there plans.

Unless the discussion in the preceding pages has entirely failed to make its point, it will be plain that what is being proposed in this book is (as I have said) a «de-mythologizing» of the inherited notions of «life after death», with their (to many of us) impossible assertions; and also the «re-mythologizing» — or better, the re-conceiving — of their implicit intention so that we may have a valid way of affirming the value and worth of human existence, its significance and importance for God, and its preservation in God as a reality which has affected the divine life and in God has acquired an enduring quality which nothing can take away.

@NAH, can rebut each of Colin's points in a reasonable manner, specifically let me call out two (both sort of related)-- the Christianity refers to only 600 years of history, and only refers to a small geography (not even the entire earth)-- why «leap of faith» argument is valid for Christianity and not for other independent faiths, which have many contradictory beliefs compared to Christianity, and if they are equally valid, how can they all be equally valid

Near the close of the book, Barr again seems to despair of his subject and calls for works in the «Christian doctrine of the Old Testament,» since «traditional Old Testament theology... has often tried to solve questions which, properly speaking, can not be solved within the horizon of the Hebrew Bible itself and within the boundaries of its resources» (this last is a very valid point).

(For link fans, the video & notes may be found at http://www.calvaryccm.com/teachings/main/video/GS49.aspx) He made a very valid point: if the crucifixion was all there was to life in Christ, Jesus and His Father could've «done it over the weekend,» rather than take 33 years... especially that last week.

This article has some valid points but is as red in color politically as the website itself.

We have already pointed out that biblical interpreters in the first century used very different methods from ours and some of the interpretations which men of those days found very convincing may no longer seem valid to us.

But amid the politico - social crisis which now besets us, have we valid, objective reasons for believing in the possibility of this hopeful state of affairs, even to the point of discerning its first indications?

I suspect you don't believe in Zeus, Odin, or Vishnu and yet you have no evidence that they do not exist — your (valid) point would be that no evidence has been presented to show that they do.

That doesn't mean there weren't some valid points in there, but no way would I ever call it «Excellent writing.»

Both K.Elizabeth and Kate have made valid points about listening and abuse survivours not acting in the way expected, making their points in an articulate and dignified manner.

Once we begin to think of our faith in terms of largeness instead of largess; once we begin to think of our faith in terms of measurable success or significant achievements or community stature or statistically significant gains or business models or congregational models or appropriate budget processes or cash flow direction or generally accepted accounting practices or independent audits or administrative requirements or procedural transparency or proper leadership roles or managerial responsibilities and boundaries or membership trends or effective organizational structures or current and accurate and relevant identity / purpose / vision / mission statements or strategic and tactical plans or valid and useful performance metrics — at that point, we have become money changers and temple authorities, we have deformed from a community into an industry that requires exclusionary individualism.

While valid, both points could have been made just as effectively in a subtler manner.

I agree with Bill Maher, but then again I'm a lifelong atheist... I have never believed for one minute that the god as portrayed in the bible or koran has any possibility of being real to everyone, otherwise that god would make itself obvious and not hide behind man made lies and cultural practices that self perpetuate thanks fo fear... otherwise there would not be several thousand man made religions trying to claim that god as their own... yes, it is an opinion, only valid to the opinion holder and no one else... Bill, thanks for so strongly making that point, not that it makes any difference to god fearing people... they will hold on to their opinion as strongly as they hold on to their shotgun, thinking that each provides them with some form of security... to intelligent people, neither is secure and neither leads to true freedom of the mind...

The general point is that most religions claim to have a monopoly on The Truth and Salvation — but since they are all predicated on unprovable, supernatural propositions, a detached, outside observer would consider them all equally (in) valid.

In this crisis of decision, the continuity with the past is accordingly abrogated and the present can not be understood from the point of view of development — though in other connections, when man is thought of as an observer, continuity may have a valid meaninIn this crisis of decision, the continuity with the past is accordingly abrogated and the present can not be understood from the point of view of development — though in other connections, when man is thought of as an observer, continuity may have a valid meaninin other connections, when man is thought of as an observer, continuity may have a valid meaning.

If you took the same readings at another point in the universe or while traveling at another speed you would get a totally valid but different time estimate of the earth.

bostontola — You can insult me all you want, but if you use that energy to focus on addressing the holes in your position, you'd have a better chance of making a valid point.

Any Christian ethic to be valid must take its starting point from the revelation of the nature and will of God as this has come to us in Jesus Christ.

My point, however, is that His actions in this world have consequences which we should be able to detect, so some science questions about God are perfectly valid.

Everyone has a valid point of view they believe in.

@chad, you have some valid points, until late 20th century Christians were able to pray in schools, have the Ten Commandments displayed and mention God in the public arena.

I think that you have made a very valid point in regards to arsenal players, but we also must understand that all these players are going to want to play whether are not the position they are placed in is what their skill set is most suited for, you will never hear Ramsay say Walcott should be played over him, because he his a better winger.

However, while Reds fans won't like Mido's comments, he makes a valid point in that Salah would be capable of having a real influence at the Bernabeu.

In terms of execution I would say there is a valid point in terms of what appears to be non-existent in - match presence and management from the bencIn terms of execution I would say there is a valid point in terms of what appears to be non-existent in - match presence and management from the bencin terms of what appears to be non-existent in - match presence and management from the bencin - match presence and management from the bench.

You have made a very valid point that he has only had a few good games and are beng consistent in your opinion.

But if we win the FA by defeating Chelsea, then your point may be a little valid... It will be interesting to defeat Chelsea in the final as it will make the trophy even bigger and we would have had a proper final as against playing Hull city...

Merson is quite clearly and vocally in the Wenger Out Brigade and if the Frenchman said the sun was going to come up tomorrow I reckon Merson would disagree, but that does not necessarily make any less valid his point about the pursuit of Vardy being the wrong move for Arsenal, as reported by Sky Sports.

So Jose Mourinho may be a pr@ck, but he does have a valid point when he taunts Arsene Wenger and Arsenal about the lack of trophy success in the last decade.

as eager as i am to get in new players - I'd have to say u do have a very valid point... We get class or no one... do nt want another Flamini

Valid point although I would prefer players to become specialist in one position... play that position week in week out and master it..

You have a valid point about Walcott, If you watched their comments after the game you'd hear Walcott explaining that the players talk among themselves and agreed that they should win in style FOR THE FANS.

I do believe that Gazidis was weak and done very little to convince Silent Stan that the issues was the managers fault, Wenger has been able to turn around and point to poor transfer activity from the board to result in a poor team for him to manage, for someone who isn't deeply understanding about football then Wengers arguments could sound equally valid.

But if you think you're making a valid point by comparing Gibbons against what looks like an entire athletic department complicit in a ongoing, years - deep culture of rape and assault of dozens if not hundreds of people (that goes for all three programs), then you have nothing valid to offer to this discussion.

You might have a valid point there, it could happen in three years, though we might need to strengthen at a faster rate as the champions each year also seem to strengthen also.

When the Guardiola announcement was made, City were in second place and just three points behind the Foxes, and Pellegrini may have a valid point when he says that it may have cost them the Premier League.

I think you were 100 % right in expressing your opinion of the views of Herb & Graham, they may well have valid points that we could all agree on but unfortunately the good points are lost in a torrent of hateful verbiage, which is a shame.

It doesn't mean that hidden somewhere deep within what I can only view as a rant, that you don't have some valid points, but it becomes hard to see the worth in them.

Still a valid point to make is that ALL of the top teams in the premiership have 1st choice national keepers, surely if we are to compete on a level playing field, we need one as well?