Sentences with phrase «hate speech all»

Soon, there will be legislation introduced at the Fed and State levels, to ban «hate speech» - which will be very broadly defined.

If you want to see bigotry and hate speech just look at what the left is trying to do the CFA.

I'm so glad he called it hate speech.

Hate speech is legal and that's a good thing.

Free speech does not equal hate speech in my book.

Until one can accept that humans are mortal and imperfect beings, that judgement of one's soul is entirely between God and that person, and live by the «Golden Rule», hate speech and hate crimes will continue.

There are many Christians, even those of us in NC, who reject this hate speech.

Let's just say all posters who lump all Christians into this guy's hate speech are as bigoted as he is.

Hate speech shouldn't exist (as a legal construct).

Not many of the cases have held against street preachers or against Christian preaching being classified as hate speech... but the very fact that these cases are being brought and that there are real cases of teachers being sacked or from the health service... I think it is under threat, yes.»

What might be involved if religious communities were to cooperate with others of good will to broker enclaves of spiritual civility, dialogical skin grafts in our ravaged neighborhoods of hate speech, misunderstanding and mistrust, provisional gatherings of our many persuasion, that could model a search for the good in common?

I'm not going to say that all christians are hateful, but the majority of hate speech I hear in the work place comes from the mouths of christians.

I say lets pass a few laws so «hate speech» like this art, can be minimized.

But trying to label conservative political speech has hate and then trying to illegalize hate speech won't solve the real problem.

You said, «Same can be said for anyone who voices there opinion and people consider it to be hate speech.»

In most civilized western countries, this pastor's remarks would qualify as hate speech and he would not have his pulpit to protect him as he does here.

«In the United States, hate speech is legal (except for obscenity, defamation, incitement to riot, and fighting words).

Same can be said for anyone who voices there opinion and people consider it to be hate speech.

There is no law against hate speech.

«In law, hate speech is any speech, gesture or conduct, writing, or display which is forbidden because it may incite violence or prejudicial action against or by a protected individual or group, or because it disparages or intimidates a protected individual or group.»

The same can't be said for hate speech.

If the Westboro Baptists should be protected for spouting their «hate speech,» then muslims can, and so can atheists.

They trash us at every turn, even going so far as to use hate speech and blatant lies to scare people into bashing or even murdering us, passing laws that make our existence illegal, etc., yet when we speak up against this treatment and push back, those same Christians accuse us of intolerance and bullying.

This is not hate speech... Quit thinking irrationally and emotionally.

Surely as thinking people we can allow for differences of opinion, even up to hate speech.

Hate speech is protected.

By that standard the writings of Dawkins, Dennet, Hitchens, PZ Myers and Sam Harris would all be bigoted hate speech and their books and websites would be pulled in many if not most countries.

i am pleased to tell you that CNN encourages hate speech by the Anvil, sam stone, tom tom and many others.

sponsor hate speech.

But the government should not sponsor hate speech

Time to start listing those parishoners in the local papers as those who support hate speech etc..

They're tax exempt, so isn't this basically government sponsored hate speech?

The idea of «hate speech» is too vague, and preventing the dissemination of «false news» is a legal impossibility.

You can't take anyone to court for hate speech, it flies in the face of the first amendment and would get you laughed at in the police station, court system and just about anyone who has a rudimentry understanding of the law.

Why is it «hate speech» when someone comes out against gays but not normal christians?

as for you Ahh comment... I've tried to be nice... doesn't work... with those like you who have closed their minds to God and what his Truth is... So I can fight for my beliefs... like I said... what you call hate speech.

I think the tooth fairy is a myth — is that hate speech against believers?

Laws on sexual harassment and «hate speech» sprout up when people do not share a code of civility.

How is this NOT considered hate speech?

Given that fact, this man clearly has broken the laws forbidding «hate speech» and the full brunt of the law should be brought down on his shoulders leaving him with neither 2 pennies to rub together no a pot to p*ss in..

Is it hate speech for you to say so?

«HATE SPEECH!»

at some point you could loss you job for promoting hate speech.

I look at how much satire their is about Catholics or the play «The Book of Mormom», yet one never sees follewers in groups setting fire to buildings of people they blame for hate speech.

Why is it when something offends the muslims it is hate speech but when someone wants to insult Christians it is totally ok to do so?

But hate speech, in the United States, is legal.

The film made about Islam and its prophet are not hate speech, but offensive speech which has already been confirmed by the U.S. Supreme Court (remember the U.S. vs. Larry Flint?)

and even if it's hate speech, that's allowed too.

CNN: Reaction to anti-Islam film fuels debate on free speech versus hate speech The deaths of the U.S. ambassador and three other Americans amid protests against a film that denigrates Islam has sparked global discussion and debate about whether there is a line between free speech and hate speech and, if so, where it lies.

«For the record, you can condemn violence in response to hate speech, and you can also condemn hate speech,» wrote Jeff Fecke on Twitter.