Most people don't
have an answer to that question because they don't realistically have the ability to pay tens of thousands of dollars in legal fees.
I never
have an answer to that question because (like my taste in music) I can never narrow myself down to ONE thing.
Not exact matches
It is imperative that you complete your Application prior
to the Open Call
because there are a lot of detailed
questions on there that you may not
have the
answers to at the Open Call.
It's best
to believe that your team alone does not
have all the
answers —
because if you believe that, it usually means you're not asking all the right
questions.»
Answering this
question is important
because different franchisors
have different restrictions on selling
to other franchisors, for instance, and some franchise businesses aren't even scalable in the first place.
That is a much more complicated topic,
because it depends on the type of business you're in, and
answering that
question here
would violate our goal
to accomplish one thing on our should list.
I always laugh at that
question,
because there are only two
answers, either you're going
to have an IPO or someone is going
to buy it.
That's
because the majority of the increased budget
has been earmarked for taxpayer assistance, including hiring up
to 1,000 additional customer service representatives
to cut down phone waits for
answers to tax
questions and reduce the number of «courtesy disconnects» by an overloaded IRS switchboard.
Yates replied that she could not
answer that
question because it
would require her
to reveal classified information.
I
have been shocked at the inability of even large businesses
to answer even basic
questions about their business,
because they don't
have proper systems and processes.
On one hand, this is threatening,
because users are getting highly visible, immediate
answers for
questions that previously might
have led them
to your site.
This column is for both,
because it identifies what, for me,
has been the single best
question for the former
to ask, and the latter
to answer well.
If prospects find
answers to their common
questions via blog posts written by people at your company, they're much more likely
to come into the sales process trusting what you
have to say
because you
've helped them in the past — even before they were interested in purchasing anything from you.
There are other researchers who will be able
to answer this
question with more precision, but the bottom line is that we don't
have good information about this
question,
because it isn't being tracked systematically.
The
answer to that
question is going
to be different for every single person —
because we all
have different perspectives and different values.
Ideally, you won't
have to face this
question in a crisis —
because you should know the
answer.
Because I
've already
answered the user's
question in the happy path, all I
have to do is link
to the right spot.
These are
questions you
have to answer one at a time
because there are pros and cons
to each type of course.
To answer your first
question, Cy, I don't think foreign participation matters too much, partly
because I don't think foreign firms will ever play a significant role in the Chinese economy except in a few consumer areas, but mostly
because they
have no systematic impact on the way growth is generated.
All example
answers are taken from issued patents, but
because the quality of issued patents is not always what one
would hope for, these example
answers have been modified and enhanced
to better provide an illustrative response
to the
question presented.
Ahead of Mr. Zuckerberg's trip
to Washington, Facebook
has hired a team from the law firm WilmerHale as well as outside consultants
to coach him on
questions lawmakers may ask, and on how
to pace his
answers and react if interrupted, according
to people close
to the preparations, who
would speak only anonymously
because the sessions were private.
Without one, you'll find that either you spend the whole day
answering questions about the story so that a journalist
has enough details
to write something interesting, or it just won't get picked up
because it's too much like hard work for an already busy reporter.
An
answer to both
question could go like this: It is sometimes fair
to tax one group higher than another
because we
have created an economy where there is an incredible potential for group A
to accumulate drastically more amounts of economic wealth than group B, even though the labor of group B is more intrinsically valuable than group A. Given this inefficiency, it is just
to redistribute asymmetrically
because the initial distribution was flawed.
I didn't
answer your
question because it is a dishonest
question» @Chad «you did nt
answer it, becasue you know precisely the position it
would put you in, namely
having to acknowledge that society shouldnt allow any behavior.
Why does the same science that rejects or supposedly debunks religion
because of the preposterous idea of an almighty, all - knowing, always present creator, yet licks their lips at the thought of an ultra intelligent extra terrestrial with the capability
to answer question break the laws of nature,
have mind reading capabilities, so on and so forth?
If your broader point is that, unless evolutionists can
answer every singly
question thrown
to them, you will resort
to magic and believe in creator god, well,
have fun,
because there will always be unanswered
questions.
«@ myweightinwords: I consider it idle curiosity
because I believe that when we die we get
to open that door and
have all the
answers to the universal
questions of creation, existence, and the afterlife.
# 2 said yes,
because he
'd be busting with curiosity
to know the
answers to all kinds of
questions that
have yet
to be revealed.
I
've already made it quite clear that I'm not going
to answer your
questions because you
have not
answered mine.
The document criticizes «doctrinal or disciplinary security,» «an obsession with the law,» «punctilious concern for... doctrine,» «dogmatism,» «hiding behind rules and regulations,» and «a rigid resistance
to change,» while reprimanding those who «give excessive importance
to certain rules,» overemphasize «ecclesial rules,» believe that «doctrine... is a closed system,» «feel superior
to others
because they observe certain rules,»
have «an
answer for every
question,» wish
to «exercise a strict supervision over others» lives,» «long for a monolithic body of doctrine guarded by all and leaving no room for nuance,» believe that «we give glory
to God... simply by following certain ethical norms,» and «look down on others like heartless judges, lording it over them and always trying
to teach them lessons.»
Maybe it's just
because I'm dull (a thesis, admittedly, that
has floated about this office on more than one occasion), but the
questions whose
answers you think should be «obvious» seem legitimate
to....
Maybe it's just
because I'm dull (a thesis, admittedly, that
has floated about this office on more than one occasion), but the
questions whose
answers you think should be «obvious» seem legitimate
to me.
I was very reluctant
to do that
because I felt that I really wasn't sure if I
would get an
answer, or that I wouldn't be ready for an
answer, or that I wouldn't know for certain if I felt that I did get an
answer that is was actually from God or whether I was just deceiving myself, so for a few years there I just put that off, however those
questions and concerns kept boiling up within me, so at that point I couldn't take it anymore putting it off.
To answer your second question, I do believe that most Calvinists are true followers of Jesus, because I consider myself to have been a true follower of Jesus, even with Calvinist persuasion
To answer your second
question, I do believe that most Calvinists are true followers of Jesus,
because I consider myself
to have been a true follower of Jesus, even with Calvinist persuasion
to have been a true follower of Jesus, even with Calvinist persuasions.
Though
to be honest, I don't know the
answer to this specific
question because I
've never read up on it.
So I Listened
to all of his sermons read all of his blogs and than decided
to leave my number
to see if he
would really call as he says on his web site, With in 2 hours I recieved a call and DR. Collins never rushed me off the telephone
answered all my
questions, And After just that one call you can tell he loves and believes in what he does, He wont be for everyone,
Because he does talk about damnation and what it takes
to get
to heaven, And its not from giving ministers our money > I watched the you tube videos of many and he is just for me, everyone
has a choice but in listening
to his sermons and reading his blogs and than the telephone call this guy is the real deal.
Contra Nathan L: David does not
have to answer your hypothetical
question, especially
because it is blasphemous, really.
The issue of organs is very important
because you still
have not
answered the big
question, at what point is it wrong
to kill the continuation of human life, which we both agree continues with the sper.m and egg and why is it at that point and not before?
Atheists often get a bad rap among Christians, but in my experience, many atheists are atheists simply
because they
have the courage
to ask
questions many Christians are afraid
to ask, and when Christians hear these
questions from atheists, the Christians either condemn the atheist for asking such
questions, or gives some
answer that is not really an
answer at all.
Men are moving away from the forms and trappings of Judaism and Christianity not
because they
have stopped searching for transcendental
answers to the fundamental
questions of human life, but
because that search
has now intensified beyond measure.»
It is significant
because this year the national dialog
has turned
to the
question of how we should respond
to our Muslim neighbors in light of those attacks, and I believe that the ways in which we
answer that
question will determine whether we allow September 11
to turn us into people of hate or people of peace.
I
have struggled with how
to answer this
question for many years,
because while we do not officially «attend church,» we feel that we are more involved with the Church than ever before, and are following Jesus in a more relational way than we ever did as regular church attenders or church leaders.
For these
questions, I
have the best
answer, «there is no heaven,
because nobody is seen going
to heaven»,
have you?
The issue here is that «science» continues
to «fill in'the gaps of our understanding, and just
because it hasn't
answered some of these
questions... yet, in no way * presupposes * that they won't be
answered in the future.
And they
had to answer practical moral
questions,
because the people who were abandoning their old gods needed
to know what the new God demanded.
Bultmann seized what he could use of these ideas: the anxiety produced by the existential
question; the dread produced by the
answer of death
to all; the attempted flight into worldly business, social status and ephemera; the rare courage
to begin an existence which
would be authentic
because open - eyed.
I know at this point its sort of kicking a dead horse,
because I know we
've both agreed that clearly we'll see what we want
to see but your
answer just begged the
question, so this friend of yours is he a) a christian himself b)
had he been praying for a job before c) why did your prayer take an entire week
to be fulfilled
d) is it a good job?
Some may and do, but I
would say most come
to also chat about religion and ask the
questions that believers don't, that's usually when the name calling starts
because believers get up in arms when they
have trouble
answering the tough
questions and accuse any unbelievers of being nasty and mean and trying
to get them
to stop believing in god.
He responded by relating the parable of the Good Samaritan, one of my personal favorites... bear traps are hidden, and often unseen till bear or human are caught in them... the traps are deliberately placed, they don't just suddenly appear... the
answer to the
question was the man who
had compassion on the man taken by robbers... he was a social and spiritual outcast who
had compassion on someone who in normal circumstances
would have hated his guts...
because his doctrine and «lifestyle» were not acceptable
to the religious establishment... I
have had life experiences that bear this out, experiencing love and compassion from people whom today's religious establishment demonizes and looks down upon... any reading of the Good Samaritan story should be followed up by a reading of 1 Corinthians 13....
I certainly
have answers to the
questions you demand I
answer, but I think you are just demanding
answers to them
because you can not provide coherent
answers to the
questions I ask.