Sentences with phrase «have an answer to that question because»

Most people don't have an answer to that question because they don't realistically have the ability to pay tens of thousands of dollars in legal fees.

I never have an answer to that question because (like my taste in music) I can never narrow myself down to ONE thing.

Not exact matches

It is imperative that you complete your Application prior to the Open Call because there are a lot of detailed questions on there that you may not have the answers to at the Open Call.

It's best to believe that your team alone does not have all the answers — because if you believe that, it usually means you're not asking all the right questions.»

Answering this question is important because different franchisors have different restrictions on selling to other franchisors, for instance, and some franchise businesses aren't even scalable in the first place.

That is a much more complicated topic, because it depends on the type of business you're in, and answering that question here would violate our goal to accomplish one thing on our should list.

I always laugh at that question, because there are only two answers, either you're going to have an IPO or someone is going to buy it.

That's because the majority of the increased budget has been earmarked for taxpayer assistance, including hiring up to 1,000 additional customer service representatives to cut down phone waits for answers to tax questions and reduce the number of «courtesy disconnects» by an overloaded IRS switchboard.

Yates replied that she could not answer that question because it would require her to reveal classified information.

I have been shocked at the inability of even large businesses to answer even basic questions about their business, because they don't have proper systems and processes.

On one hand, this is threatening, because users are getting highly visible, immediate answers for questions that previously might have led them to your site.

This column is for both, because it identifies what, for me, has been the single best question for the former to ask, and the latter to answer well.

If prospects find answers to their common questions via blog posts written by people at your company, they're much more likely to come into the sales process trusting what you have to say because you've helped them in the past — even before they were interested in purchasing anything from you.

There are other researchers who will be able to answer this question with more precision, but the bottom line is that we don't have good information about this question, because it isn't being tracked systematically.

The answer to that question is going to be different for every single person — because we all have different perspectives and different values.

Ideally, you won't have to face this question in a crisis — because you should know the answer.

Because I've already answered the user's question in the happy path, all I have to do is link to the right spot.

These are questions you have to answer one at a time because there are pros and cons to each type of course.

To answer your first question, Cy, I don't think foreign participation matters too much, partly because I don't think foreign firms will ever play a significant role in the Chinese economy except in a few consumer areas, but mostly because they have no systematic impact on the way growth is generated.

All example answers are taken from issued patents, but because the quality of issued patents is not always what one would hope for, these example answers have been modified and enhanced to better provide an illustrative response to the question presented.

Ahead of Mr. Zuckerberg's trip to Washington, Facebook has hired a team from the law firm WilmerHale as well as outside consultants to coach him on questions lawmakers may ask, and on how to pace his answers and react if interrupted, according to people close to the preparations, who would speak only anonymously because the sessions were private.

Without one, you'll find that either you spend the whole day answering questions about the story so that a journalist has enough details to write something interesting, or it just won't get picked up because it's too much like hard work for an already busy reporter.

An answer to both question could go like this: It is sometimes fair to tax one group higher than another because we have created an economy where there is an incredible potential for group A to accumulate drastically more amounts of economic wealth than group B, even though the labor of group B is more intrinsically valuable than group A. Given this inefficiency, it is just to redistribute asymmetrically because the initial distribution was flawed.

I didn't answer your question because it is a dishonest question» @Chad «you did nt answer it, becasue you know precisely the position it would put you in, namely having to acknowledge that society shouldnt allow any behavior.

Why does the same science that rejects or supposedly debunks religion because of the preposterous idea of an almighty, all - knowing, always present creator, yet licks their lips at the thought of an ultra intelligent extra terrestrial with the capability to answer question break the laws of nature, have mind reading capabilities, so on and so forth?

If your broader point is that, unless evolutionists can answer every singly question thrown to them, you will resort to magic and believe in creator god, well, have fun, because there will always be unanswered questions.

«@ myweightinwords: I consider it idle curiosity because I believe that when we die we get to open that door and have all the answers to the universal questions of creation, existence, and the afterlife.

# 2 said yes, because he'd be busting with curiosity to know the answers to all kinds of questions that have yet to be revealed.

I've already made it quite clear that I'm not going to answer your questions because you have not answered mine.

The document criticizes «doctrinal or disciplinary security,» «an obsession with the law,» «punctilious concern for... doctrine,» «dogmatism,» «hiding behind rules and regulations,» and «a rigid resistance to change,» while reprimanding those who «give excessive importance to certain rules,» overemphasize «ecclesial rules,» believe that «doctrine... is a closed system,» «feel superior to others because they observe certain rules,» have «an answer for every question,» wish to «exercise a strict supervision over others» lives,» «long for a monolithic body of doctrine guarded by all and leaving no room for nuance,» believe that «we give glory to God... simply by following certain ethical norms,» and «look down on others like heartless judges, lording it over them and always trying to teach them lessons.»

Maybe it's just because I'm dull (a thesis, admittedly, that has floated about this office on more than one occasion), but the questions whose answers you think should be «obvious» seem legitimate to....

Maybe it's just because I'm dull (a thesis, admittedly, that has floated about this office on more than one occasion), but the questions whose answers you think should be «obvious» seem legitimate to me.

I was very reluctant to do that because I felt that I really wasn't sure if I would get an answer, or that I wouldn't be ready for an answer, or that I wouldn't know for certain if I felt that I did get an answer that is was actually from God or whether I was just deceiving myself, so for a few years there I just put that off, however those questions and concerns kept boiling up within me, so at that point I couldn't take it anymore putting it off.

To answer your second question, I do believe that most Calvinists are true followers of Jesus, because I consider myself to have been a true follower of Jesus, even with Calvinist persuasionTo answer your second question, I do believe that most Calvinists are true followers of Jesus, because I consider myself to have been a true follower of Jesus, even with Calvinist persuasionto have been a true follower of Jesus, even with Calvinist persuasions.

Though to be honest, I don't know the answer to this specific question because I've never read up on it.

So I Listened to all of his sermons read all of his blogs and than decided to leave my number to see if he would really call as he says on his web site, With in 2 hours I recieved a call and DR. Collins never rushed me off the telephone answered all my questions, And After just that one call you can tell he loves and believes in what he does, He wont be for everyone, Because he does talk about damnation and what it takes to get to heaven, And its not from giving ministers our money > I watched the you tube videos of many and he is just for me, everyone has a choice but in listening to his sermons and reading his blogs and than the telephone call this guy is the real deal.

Contra Nathan L: David does not have to answer your hypothetical question, especially because it is blasphemous, really.

The issue of organs is very important because you still have not answered the big question, at what point is it wrong to kill the continuation of human life, which we both agree continues with the sper.m and egg and why is it at that point and not before?

Atheists often get a bad rap among Christians, but in my experience, many atheists are atheists simply because they have the courage to ask questions many Christians are afraid to ask, and when Christians hear these questions from atheists, the Christians either condemn the atheist for asking such questions, or gives some answer that is not really an answer at all.

Men are moving away from the forms and trappings of Judaism and Christianity not because they have stopped searching for transcendental answers to the fundamental questions of human life, but because that search has now intensified beyond measure.»

It is significant because this year the national dialog has turned to the question of how we should respond to our Muslim neighbors in light of those attacks, and I believe that the ways in which we answer that question will determine whether we allow September 11 to turn us into people of hate or people of peace.

I have struggled with how to answer this question for many years, because while we do not officially «attend church,» we feel that we are more involved with the Church than ever before, and are following Jesus in a more relational way than we ever did as regular church attenders or church leaders.

For these questions, I have the best answer, «there is no heaven, because nobody is seen going to heaven», have you?

The issue here is that «science» continues to «fill in'the gaps of our understanding, and just because it hasn't answered some of these questions... yet, in no way * presupposes * that they won't be answered in the future.

And they had to answer practical moral questions, because the people who were abandoning their old gods needed to know what the new God demanded.

Bultmann seized what he could use of these ideas: the anxiety produced by the existential question; the dread produced by the answer of death to all; the attempted flight into worldly business, social status and ephemera; the rare courage to begin an existence which would be authentic because open - eyed.

I know at this point its sort of kicking a dead horse, because I know we've both agreed that clearly we'll see what we want to see but your answer just begged the question, so this friend of yours is he a) a christian himself b) had he been praying for a job before c) why did your prayer take an entire week to be fulfilled d) is it a good job?

Some may and do, but I would say most come to also chat about religion and ask the questions that believers don't, that's usually when the name calling starts because believers get up in arms when they have trouble answering the tough questions and accuse any unbelievers of being nasty and mean and trying to get them to stop believing in god.

He responded by relating the parable of the Good Samaritan, one of my personal favorites... bear traps are hidden, and often unseen till bear or human are caught in them... the traps are deliberately placed, they don't just suddenly appear... the answer to the question was the man who had compassion on the man taken by robbers... he was a social and spiritual outcast who had compassion on someone who in normal circumstances would have hated his guts... because his doctrine and «lifestyle» were not acceptable to the religious establishment... I have had life experiences that bear this out, experiencing love and compassion from people whom today's religious establishment demonizes and looks down upon... any reading of the Good Samaritan story should be followed up by a reading of 1 Corinthians 13....

I certainly have answers to the questions you demand I answer, but I think you are just demanding answers to them because you can not provide coherent answers to the questions I ask.