Sentences with phrase «have custody of the children because»

Provides for cash assistance if the court has placed a child with a nonparent relative, the child's parents are deceased and the child is living with a such relative, or if a non-parent relative has custody of the child because the child is abandoned.

Not exact matches

lmao sure tell that the the hormone driven teens of the world... you can only have woopie if your going to marry, marriage will go through the roof... but so will divorce and lawyers will love that mentality because child custody battles make them loads of money and let's not forget the physcologist / phychiatrists that will make big money having to help all these emotionally damaged adults that were dragged through custody battles due to the fact their genetic donors procreated when it was the best time for them.

In an exceptional case, Illinois child protection authorities have taken a 6 - year - old boy from the custody of a Champaign mother because she was still breastfeeding him, allegedly against his wishes.

This is still considered joint physical custody because the parent who has the children on the weekend is spending pretty much equal time with them as the parent who has them from after school on Monday until beginning of school on Friday since the weekend parent is with them all day Saturday and Sunday, as well as rest of the day Friday.

However, this exclusion may have lead to underestimating the number of fathers that had talked with their children's doctor because fathers with sole custody often have increased child - caretaking responsibilities.

Kiarre Harris, whose children were removed from her custody by a Family Court judge, has filed civil rights complaints with both the U.S. Department of Justice and the U.S. Department of Education, alleging that both the school district and Erie County Child Protective Services discriminated against her because she is black.

In the meantime, the biggest question is who is to get custody of Ruth (Elle Fanning, Daddy Day Care), the young daughter the couple had because they thought bringing another child into the world would help.

Because of the second tiebreaker rule (residence), the parent who has legal custody of a child is generally the parent who gets to claim the child in cases of divorced or separated parents.

Because the State of California has a strong interest in the welfare of children, parents can not agree in advance that a child custody or visitation order may not be modified.

Citing Indiana Code Section 31 -17-2-15, it ruled that because the parents could communicate without being hostile, it would be in the best interests of the children to award joint legal custody, as well as overnight stays on Sundays, and additionally reduced his support payments from about $ 250 a week to $ 150 a week, based on the increased amount of time he was spending with the children and the fact that the mother's pay had increased and the cost of child care had gone down.

Second, he argued that «because he and Wife do not communicate well, joint custody would be healthiest, as it keeps the child from developing a negative perception of the non-custodial parent.»

The imposition of the mandatory minimum sentence at issue in this case would have disproportionately negative consequences for women because of the nature of their involvement with the drug trade, this impact of incarceration on child custody and motherhood, and the likelihood that BC women will be jailed far from their home communities.

Because it is a child's right to have a relationship with both of their parents, a Judge will usually order that the spouse who does not have custody of the children will be able to visit the children.

West Coast LEAF will argue that the mandatory jail sentence at issue in this case has a disproportionate impact on women because of their role as primary caregivers and the potential for loss of child custody, and the likelihood that women will be jailed far from their home communities because of the lack of adequate facilities for incarcerated women in BC, among other issues.

The Japanese courts purported to acknowledge that he had custody of the child, which he had been awarded in Wisconsin, where the child was born and lived, but then decided that the child should stay in Japan with her Japanese mother because by that time the delays had been such that she had already been in Japan for a significant period of time.

Because you are married, you both have joint custody of the children; therefore, she can not legally claim to have custody of the kids.

This is because, by the nature of child custody disputes themselves, it has been demonstrated that there is a certain degree of animosity and even hostility between the parties to the case.

The Hague Convention you identify is generally enforced in the domestic courts of the country where the child is physically located that has child custody jurisdiction or via a «Central Authority» as defined by a signatory to the Convention, although it is a bit more complex than that because the Hague Convention has one set of rules for «emergencies» and another for ordinary cases.

Does Article 20 TFEU preclude a third country national from being refused a residence permit because of lack of means of subsistence in a family situation in which his spouse has custody of a child who is a citizen of the Union and the third country national is not the child's parent, does not have custody of the child, and does not live with his spouse or with the child?

Wendy Perry is a leading parent and child advocate for families involved in post-divorce conflict surrounding child custody, and Rod McCall is a parent - child advocate and speaker, having lost his son to a murder - suicide by the mother because of this devastating family pathology surrounding divorce and child custody.

Judge Nancy Gordon gave custody of the children to Ms. Giordano's abusive husband who now resides in Chicago in part because «the course of [Ms. Giordano's] disease is unknown, and «children who have a parent with cancer need more contact with the non-ill parent.»

In an extremely sad case, and yet another shining example of why collaborative law is such a promising tool for resolving family law conflicts, Alaina Giordano has lost custody of her two children because of a terminal breast cancer diagnosis.

He filed for temporary sole custody of the children, alleging that he feared for their safety because of incidents involving harassment by S.L. and that she also had extramarital affairs and abused alcohol and drugs.

For example, one parent may use custody as a cynical bargaining chip, such as a father in a divorce who has no realistic chance of winning custody (and even no real interest in having the children live with him) threatening to sue for custody because he knows it may prompt the mother to negotiate away some of her financial rights.

Even if a morality clause is not present in the decree, the other parent could still challenge custody by arguing the arrangement is not in the child's best interests because the boyfriend, for example, abuses drugs or alcohol or has been convicted of a sexual offense.

The court has discretion in determining if the circumstances have substantially changed, but New York courts have denied requests to change custody when they were based solely on the wishes of the child or because a parent remarried.

Because domestic violence can seriously affect a child's safety and welfare, a judge has the power to award full temporary custody to you based on the existence of the abuse.

When actress Choi Jin - sil, who had sole custody of her two children after divorce, committed suicide in October 2008, there was heated discussion over who should be awarded custody of the children because the actress» mother did not want the father to raise the children, and many pointed out that the system needs to be overhauled.

In this respect, a guardianship order overrules the custody provisions of a family court order, because the guardian has the right to act on behalf of the child, while the parent's rights to do so are legally on hold.

Beyond 100 miles, however, the proposed relocation can have an impact on child and spousal support, legal and physical custody and property distribution because the courts recognize that the relocation fundamentally changes the relationship between the child and the noncustodial parent, particularly the costs of visitation.

Virginia courts have jurisdiction over custody cases if the child lives in the state and at least one parent lives or works in the state, or if the child resided in Virginia within the last 6 months and was only removed from the state because a custodial parent moved out of the state.

adoption service (s)(in intercountry adoption) The six major services provided by adoption service providers: (1) Identifying a child for adoption and arranging an adoption; (2) Securing the necessary consent to termination of parental rights and to adoption; (3) Performing a background study on a child or a home study on a prospective adoptive parent (s), and reporting on such a study; (4) Making nonjudicial determinations of the best interests of a child and the appropriateness of an adoptive placement for the child; (5) Monitoring a case after a child has been placed with prospective adoptive parent (s) until final adoption; or (6) When necessary because of a disruption before final adoption, assuming custody and providing (including facilitating the provision of) child care or any other social service pending an alternative placement.

Just because the child lives in North Carolina and you have a valid child custody order in place does not mean you are out of the woods just yet.

Because the state has custody of foster children, the court makes all major decisions regarding their lives while they're in foster care.

Because the percentage of custodial time would be a factor in calculating child support, parents might become more vigorous in custody litigation because of the potential economic Because the percentage of custodial time would be a factor in calculating child support, parents might become more vigorous in custody litigation because of the potential economic because of the potential economic impact.

This can be somewhat confusing, because people will often get divorced before other issues, such as child custody and support, property division, and spousal support have been disposed of.

An attorney can tell you if your reason for changing custody is something that will stand up in court, such as that you've had to take your ex back to court repeatedly because he's broken the custody terms of the decree, or that circumstances in your ex's home have changed dramatically and now pose a threat to your child's well - being.

The impacts of this have been felt far and wide, because child custody battles are often by their very nature, combative affairs, and these can be very stressful times for both the parents and the children.

This has led to big changes in the overall climate of child custody in Texas, because now everything is very much geared up to avoid having to go to court in order to decide on child custody matters, and instead a more collegiate approach is the norm, where all parties are encouraged to get around the table and mutually agree on what visitations would work best for the child.

Courts in Mississippi do not like to disrupt children's lives because of divorce, so whatever custody arrangement the court awards during the temporary hearing is likely to carry over into the final decree, especially if it's working well and has become the norm.

Because Missouri law has a strong presumption in favor of allowing both parents to continue contact with the child, it is wise to suggest visitation for the other parent if you are seeking full custody.

The woman who is not disturbed «enough» to lose custody of her children in the courtroom will not have money denied to her because she engages in this behavior; nor will she go to jail.

There is not even a suggestion that if, as a demographic group, children of divorce are having more problems — assuming they are — it's more likely to be because of the rise in popularity of the ridiculous, schizophrenic, and unstable co-parenting ideology, which in turn is increasing the absence of mothers from their children's lives, as well as increasing stressful, wasteful, and expensive years of «burgeoning custody litigation,» including the endless talkety talk - talk meddling with families by those who make their money doing «therapeutic jurisprudence.»

Instead, Jones has been making headlines because of a custody battle with his ex-wife, Kelly Nichols, who is the mother of his three children.

Fathers have, because of the new legislation, obtained a stronger position in child custody cases than their efforts in the caretaking of children should fairly allow.»

When I have won changes of custody because of false allegations or child alienation, the child has violated the order (run away to the favored parent's house) and / or the favored parent has run away with the child.

«The district court concluded for purposes of the statutory modification requirement, that MA - E's «emotional development is impaired in the environment of [Adler's] sole legal and physical custody because [Adler] will not permit the child to have a normal relationship with [Espinosa], and [Adler] will cause [MA - E] distress by systematically undermining [Espinosa's] involvement with the child.»

(c) subject to any order of a court for the time being in force, a person who has parental responsibility for a child because of the operation of this Act or another Australian law and is responsible for the day ‑ to ‑ day or long ‑ term care, welfare and development of the child should be regarded as having rights of custody in respect of the child; and

«Dr. Lawlor testified at trial that it would be in the best interest of the children for the trial court to award sole custody to Daniel because Sandy was engaging in a pattern of behavior known as parental alienation syndrome.»

(a) each of the parents of a child should be regarded as having rights of custody in respect of the child unless the parent has no parental responsibility for the child because of any order of a court for the time being in force; and