Sentences with phrase «have different opinion as»

Although other courts may agree that fundamental rights are implicated, they have a different opinion as to the status of minors.

Its cool to have a different opinion as long as you do nt try to negate others opinions due to yours.

but if you expect people to respect you, then shouldnt you respect others who have a different opinion as well??? the truth is, not everyone thinks gay marriage is right.

Interestingly, responding to those counter arguments helps me better articulate my point and really only reinforces my original statement It's fun to have a discussion with someone who has a different opinion as long as we actually listen to each other and refrain from personal insults (had some of those, too).

It makes sense that this question would come up a lot in dog conversations and different people have different opinions as to which is the better choice.

Each of you has a different opinion as to what a code is or a statue or a law.

Before Brown, the file went through the hands of various judges «who each had different opinions as to the merits of the case,» he says.

He just has a different opinion as to who they'll blame for their hardships.

However, when you dig deeper into these articles, it can be overwhelming and somewhat disappointing, as every «expert» has a different opinion as to how to best define your personal brand.

Please, remember that people have different opinions as to what constitutes e.g. permissive parenting or authoritative parenting.

Not exact matches

As governor of the nation, Trump would need to surround himself with politically experienced people and be willing to work with both Democrats and Republicans who hold different opinions and values than he does in order to get things done.

It also focuses on the friction between FBI agents on site, who had different opinions on problem solving, as well as Koresh's leadership.

Whether it is noise, work ethic, cleanliness, or appropriateness, every generation and person in the space can and times will have a different opinion of what is annoying and should be considered as acceptable.

By asking enough economists or investment managers you will find as many different opinions on the subject as would care to, no doubt many of them conflicting.

Atheists: I know many there are many people that practice religion just by fanaticism, I've seen many people in my opinion stupid (excuse the word) praying to saints hopping to solve their problems by repeating pre-made sentences over and over, but there are others different, I don't think Religion and Science need to be opposites, I believe in God, I'm Catholic and I have many reasons to believe in him, I don't think however that we should pray instead of looking for the cause and applying a solution, Atheists think they are smart because they focus on Science and technology instead of putting their faith in a God, I don't think God will solve our problems, i think he gave us the means to solve them by ourselves that's were God is, also I think that God created everything but not as a Magical thing but stablishing certain rules like Physics and Quimics etc. he's not an idiot and he knew how to make it so everything was on balance, he's the Scientist of Scientist the Mathematic of Mathematics, the Physician of Physicians, from the tiny little fact that a mosquito, an insect species needs to feed from blood from a completely different species, who created the mosquitos that way?

«As I understand the various opinions today: One Justice holds that two - parent notification is unconstitutional (at least in the present circumstances) without judicial bypass, but constitutional with bypass; four Justices would hold that two - parent notification is constitutional with or without bypass; four Justices would hold that two - parent notification is unconstitutional with or without bypass, though the four apply two different standards; six Justices hold that one - parent notification with bypass is constitutional, though for two different sets of reasons; and three Justices would hold that one - parent notification with bypass is unconstitutional.»

I'm curious as to how AHA escapes their own assertion of bias since they have a specific opinion on religions as well and on what topics they feel an evangelical research firm should poll, but those are different blog posts for another day.

Without her I might have had opinions not widely different from those I have had; but I view the chances as slight that I would have been able to formulate them nearly so well and adequately as I have done.

Hence he can, for example, be of the opinion that the Church could give up the indissolubility of sacramental marriage just as well as the ecclesial form of contracting a marriage, or that she could change the very principles of sexual morality because formerly she took a different authoritative, though not definitive, view of their application, which will perhaps have to be revised.

But to defend their and your First Amendment rights you have to support all of right to be different from each other, a government that does not impede reglious opinion or set one as the «national religion».

Most truly spiritual people would thank him for sharing, and not give him labels such as «obnoxious» — because you are doing the things you claim to hate — labeling to manipulate opinion and silence opposing viewpoints that are different from your own.

while breifly going thru this artical it was makeing my stomach turn, this is just what the devil wants is for doubt and confusion, christianity is growing stronger than ever, souls are being saved and lives are changing every day, and do nt for one minute think any different, or try tp put christians down, why would we loose faith, god answers our prayers everyday, think what you want and do what you do, but do nt try to put things in other people's opinion or minds, jesus died for our sins, so that we can have better lives and be forgiven for our sins here on earth and move on to a beter place, becouse souls do nt die «read the bible, if you do nt understand it, find a church that can help you learn a better way of life, I pray for everyone out there that does nt know jesus christ as ther savior to accept what he has to offer to you «love forgiveness and ever lasting life «Christians» stay strong and [ass the word of god on and share all your tedtimonies in life» god bless everyone»»

America was founded on Christian beliefs, and even atheists should honor and respect these beliefs (RE: Ancient Laws (Jefferson)-RRB- even though they do not believe in God... and just as we are told to respect them they should also respect us; sounds like they like being bullies; it should be understood that all can have their own opinion, but we should not condemn each other for different opinions.

Further, people with such different attitudes as those I have mentioned are united in a common inability to listen with complete objectivity to what the texts teach us about the faith and hope of primitive Christianity, without mixing their own opinions and the views that are so dear to them with their interpretation of the texts.

As I currently understand, you would want to understand «opinion», «defamation», and these three concepts: «a true statement» vs a «false statement», a public person (there appear to be different types), and acting with «malice».

As I've said before, someone having a different opinion than you does not make them ignorant or unlearned.

Finally, without the Christ given Teaching Authority of the Magisterium, You and I at best would have no certainty about these truths, as is evidenced by 10's of thousands of protestant denominations, all with different opinions of the same truth, and at worst we would know nothing about them at all!!»

The new NIV argues that these two terms should be taken together to refer to active and passive partners in male anal sex; the 1980s NIV translated the word as «male prostitutes»; and other Bibles and scholars have all sorts of different opinions.

Speaking of loyalty in professional football, many people have different opinions about it but I am not here to lecture anyone on loyalty or disloyalty... I am pretty sure that many of us will agree that Arsene Wenger is one of the most loyal managers in the world as he is loyal to a fault, in fact, many believe that his loyalty has caused more harm than good to the club....

Regardless of peoles opinions on Vardy and his suitability with us he has scored more goals that our so called striker It will be interesting to see what happens over the Euro's as France are a very strong team and if Giroud is leading the line and they do well, it could prompt other sied to look at him in a different light Wenger as usual will sit on his hands until the last days of the window now he has brought on one player Forgey Mihkatarin we wont be getting himdespite the fact he likes us Wenger WONT like his price tag

nice to see you crawl out of your hole just in time to offer your 2 cents worth once again... unlike yourself I started following this team long before Wenger arrived on the scene and will continue to do so long after he's gone... in his earlier years I admired the cerebral elements he brought to the EPL, which at that point was more brutish than beautiful, and I respected the seemingly tireless efforts of Arsene, Dein & staff to uncover and develop talent without sacrificing the product on the field... likewise I appreciated that such a youthful manager wasn't afraid to bring strong personalities and / or world - class players into the fold without being fearful of how said players would potentially undermine and / or dilute his authority... unfortunately this all changed about 10 years ago and culminated in the removal of all our greatest players, both young and old, without any real replacements coming in... from Henry to RVP to Fabergas and Nasri, it was easy to see that this club was no longer interested in competing at the highest levels... instead of being honest, minus the ridiculous claims regarding the new stadium, Wenger chose to side with management and in doing so became the «front man» for this corporation pretending to be a world - class soccer club... without the «front man» this organization would have been exposed numerous years earlier, so his presence was imperative if the facade was to continue... it's for this reason and more that I despise what this once great man and Kroenke has done to my beloved club... the gutless, shameful and manipulative way they have treated the fans, like myself, is largely indefensible and this is why I felt it necessary to start offering my opinion in a public format... trust me, I resisted the temptation for many years but as long as the same shit continues to exist I will voice my opinions and if you don't like it maybe you should look for a different team to pretend to follow

Wenger need really only two players in my opinion, and they would be either Kondogbia or Schneirdelin, in the CDM role NOT be cause Le Coq is in any way inferior but only to back him up or cover if injured, rotation is a good thing as it gives us options against different clubs.

We may all have different opinions on what success for Arsenal actually is, but it would be great to really know wengers goals, what he deems as personal success, then we know what to expect, easier to judge him.

It seems Wenger has different opinion, Carzola + Ramsey are starting as double pivots versus Everton.

Football is a matter of opinions in some ways, even though it is on paper a simple game that is about getting a round bag full of wind into an oversized net, and this is highlighted perfectly by the very different sections of Arsenal fans that have become known as the WOB and the AKBs.

conversation has come up as per usual... And I mean everyone is entitled to their own opinions, but... for me there doesn't seem to be a difference in opinions, the same bog standard 4 -2-3-1 (put me to f@cking sleep formation) is the basis to which we turn to time and time again, the only difference is the personnel... and the assumption that they bring tactically a different aspect to the team..

you are such a tw, t every post you bitch and moan like a little girl and constantly calling out anyone who dosent follow your trail of thought,, its old and boring,, we come on here to discuss football not all are going to agree but wanting to attack other peoples views is pathetic... ny gunner sumo big gun may not think the same as you but you shouldnt come on here looking to abuse them,,, and having different opinions dosnt make you an idiot or a fool but then that door swings both ways....

I know many people will have different reasons or opinions as to why we lost yesterday but am not here to form the «know it all» and claim to know the actual cause of the loss.

As fans we all have different opinions and very often it's not Wengers.

Stan is a sports investment businessman and no doubt a very good one who has profited, in my opinion hill - wood who sold the fans down the river is to blame for selling his shares (along with the rest of the board then - it was only Bracewell - Smith who admitted she sold to the wrong person) wenger as an employee of Arsenal fc has done everything what the club needs ie finish forth, however I do honestly believe with a different more tactically astute manager we would be in a better place now and maybe even won the league last season

We all have different opinions, however I don't see how subs take balls as by making one he has nothing to lose.

Graham I don't know you and in bloggers world we can only form an opinion on someone based on how they portray their comments, but I see you as a blogger that has made his mind up so long ago and has drawn a line under it, and that there is no room for change of opinion or a more considered viewpoint anymore looking at issues from different angles.

I'm sure we both want the same end result for the club, we just have very different opinions as to how it can be achieved.

Anyway this is just a blog of passionate Arsenal supporters with different points of view and as I have said frequently some of you meet up quite regularly for games and one can express oneself and have a debate with one another and agree or disagree there can be no misunderstanding, whilst with different styles and level of writing, various statements, opinions, or facts can be unintentionally misunderstood

In my opinion, Douglas Costa would be an excellent signing, as he provides something different to what we already have, and I believe that this is important.

The good news about fighting with your parents is that in many families the arguing will lessen as parents get more comfortable with the idea that their teen has a right to certain opinions and an identity that may be different from theirs.

Just as parents have different opinions regarding night feeding for their babies, child experts also have various recommendations.

And though in March Hurtado voted in favor of having Bettin serve as assistant executive director and naming him as Bott's successor, he appeared to have a different opinion on Tuesday.

As a mom who wore my baby — both because I believed in the concept of bonding and because it was one of the only ways my baby would reliably settle — and also as a parenting blogger (www.bostonmamas.com) who truly seeks to see, understand, and ultimately respect different parenting approaches and opinions, when I first saw this ad my gut reaction was that it was an intentionally inciting campaign to cause buzz (in the way of «any press is good press»As a mom who wore my baby — both because I believed in the concept of bonding and because it was one of the only ways my baby would reliably settle — and also as a parenting blogger (www.bostonmamas.com) who truly seeks to see, understand, and ultimately respect different parenting approaches and opinions, when I first saw this ad my gut reaction was that it was an intentionally inciting campaign to cause buzz (in the way of «any press is good press»as a parenting blogger (www.bostonmamas.com) who truly seeks to see, understand, and ultimately respect different parenting approaches and opinions, when I first saw this ad my gut reaction was that it was an intentionally inciting campaign to cause buzz (in the way of «any press is good press»).

Just as we all have differing political opinions we also have different opinions of what food to eat.