Sentences with phrase «have less money so»

«Publishers have less money so they have less money (for) authors, they buy fewer books, and they offer lower advances.»

Not exact matches

And even the Federal Reserve's modest rate hikes have had an outsized impact on the bottom line of Bank of America, which pockets the extra interest it collects on loans while paying out much less on consumers» deposits (making money on the so - called spread).

Firstly, because it means higher interest rates — so when companies try to borrow money, that money will become more expensive and as a result they will have less room to give returns to investors.

It's unclear why the company would need to raise so much more money less than a year after a previous fundraising round, Recode reports.

So happy, they may even be willing to take a pay cut to work for a dog - friendly company: a survey conducted by Modern Dog magazine revealed that 65 % of readers would take a job for less money if it meant they could bring their dog to work.

You should keep in mind that angel investors tend to be individuals not corporations, so they tend to have less money to invest in you.

You want the best product you can get for the money you have to spend, so employ an approach that maintains the possibility of spending less than you had originally planned.

Your money has less time to grow in the market, so hitting a particular financial goal will require saving more or retiring later.

«It's the first generation that is making less money than their parents, so we've got to give them a super-convenient solution, but we can't compromise on the quality of the food.

According to the survey, 49 % of respondents said they have less money than they did before the crisis, so they can't save as much, while 27 % said they're worried about market volatility.

This could help the company do a better job of targeting ads so that advertisers would pay more and have less reason to spend their money on Facebook.

If the asset's price drops, you will be getting more shares of the asset for the same amount of money, and so if and when the price recovers, you will have spent less per share, on average, than if you had bought the shares at their peak pre-fall price.

For example, you might choose to pay off your student loans that have the highest interest rates first so that you can pay less money over time.

Work with them throughout the year so that they can provide advice and find deductions that you may have overlooked — which means you'll have less money to pay the IRS.

There will of course be inflation, so the money in the future will have less purchasing power than it does today, but it's still a whole lot more money than there was to begin with.

I'm in Australia, so perhaps I'm seeing different pricing options, but for me, all plans have far less storage and bandwidth and wp installs for your money.

One of the key ideas underlying a 401 (k) is that most people drop into a lower tax bracket when they retire and stop earning a salary, so that when they pull money from their 401 (k) they're paying less tax than they would have paid on that money while working.

The base - money (M2) multiplier, shown further below, has, at the same time, fallen to below half its pre-crisis level, from about 8 to 3.5 or so (not long ago it was less than 3).

So if we started to get inflation that's going to create a real problem for the central banks because they won't be able to emit in the quantities of currency they've been emitting because that will fuel inflation and inflation of course destroys capital, it destroys the savings, it destroys the purchasing power of wages and people actually have less money to spend, less purchasing power.

But even if so, a refresher is useful in order to help remind oneself about «how trading really works», and how long - term success is actually achieved (Hint: It has less to do with «signal generation» and much more to do with «money management and risk management»).

So long as you know how your money is being allocated and have a plan for what to do in different scenarios, you will go through life with much less financial stress.

It feels so good making so much money when other people have to work for so much less.

Yeah because the $ 35,000 a year or less that 90 % of preachers make for having to spiritually and emotionally guide people is so about just being in it for the money.

Having just left the employ of a company that seemed to promote only Catholics (one affiliated with Santorum no less), I have no great love for so long for seeing these people get any more money or power.

I had spent so much money buying books about fishing, attending fishing conferences, going to Africa to fish, and founding the World Fishing Training Center that although it was true that I had never caught any fish, this did not make me any less of an expert in fishing.

I might be ecelectic, but what makes me consistent is my belief is something that combines the belief of Scripture with that of Englightenment philosophy: nurturing life is goodness, simply, and helping others to see a model that thinking for ourselves can help heal the world of all past injustices - so that we all learn to WANT to be good... within reason and by our own choice...: you have a society like that, you'll have less injustices, less violence, less money - grubbing by people who hold themselves as representatives of «authority» -(which side are you on, by the way, if you see the world as so divided in such a bipolar reality...?)

Charities help reduce the need for government dependence, so less tax money has to be taken from the citizens.

Also, since the white defendents on average will have had more money than the black defendents, they will have been less likely on finances alone to be falsely imprisoned, or imprisoned at all, so it is hard to separate finances from race.

If you're new to this lifestyle though and you're not a total health freak just yet I'd start with something a little less expensive so that you can decide whether you really do love smoothies enough to spend so much money!

«The economy has made the customer a lot smarter; they have less money to spend, so they spend it more wisely,» Ibrahim says.

I know some people have goals this new year to eat more meals at home, to eat healthier, or to spend less money on takeout, so this is a perfect time to share this recipe — it can take care of all three of those!

I'm going to have to study the recipes a little though, so that switching around dishes would cost me less money.

I don't have a lot of money so it would either need to be borrowed or a less expensive hand held type.

Alkaline water has been suggested to help detoxify the body, alkalize pH levels and boost immunity - plus it cost less than the water service we had before so we can instead spend that money in fun activities for the team!

Yeah yeah yeah It's a priority to get a new striker in of course it is PROVIDING that he cost less that a fiver, is world class, French and is young enough to make a profit on when we resell him So not really a priority at all!!!!!! The priority here is the same as it's always been and that NOT spending any money (where is the BT sports money we have got?)

But if we're reportedly offering less than his # 25m release clause, then that would make him a lot better value for money, so who knows, might be a good deal after all.

Liverpool offered Barcelona more money for Alexis Sanchez than we did, but Alexis said he wanted to come to Arsenal so Barca had to accept our offer, even though it was for less money.

Correction The initial fee paid for Di Maria was 25 million Euros, Which at that time when the value of the Euro was half of the pound (I know this because i was in Portugal, when this news broke) equates to around 12.5 Million, Plus a further 11 Million Euros # 6.5 Million If he won a title in his first season which they did, So all in all 19 Million pounds (Wow what a tremendous amount of money to spend, Jesus Andy Caroll cost more than him in the same god damn season)... Falcao's had a release clause of 45 Million, One which they paid money to him and his agent in order to instill in his contract, This is a sour note for most Porto fans because, he jumped ship having signed a 5 year deal In July and he left in August for less money for his buy out clause.

It has become something of an overriding theme of the sport at the moment that a club's expenditure determines, more or less, a club's achievements, and so it's almost refreshing to see a club spend as much money as Newcastle have and fall flat on their faces.

Leicester won by spending very less so why can not we do that.Wemger has wasted money by spending on many # 17 - 25 million players.

But it has been one disappointment after another so far and the fact that it looks like being a club with much less money than us that is crowned champions this year makes it all the more frustrating.

@ jAmerican I agree with you totally that vidal will be with us next season and I also think that he will cost less than MS something wenger has looked at as we all know he loves to save money, so after cech and vidal im hoping for an attacker then on to lifting the cl, pl and fa trophy

just reading around and all if not most rags are saying our net spend is # 46 million how can they tell that when they do nt even know what our real budget is if it was # 100 million then we are in profit by quite a bit i do nt really know what they base there assumptions on this is where you could do with swiss ramble to dissect what really was spent from what i could see most of our 5 transfers were covered by out goings and c / l monies earned debuchy - vela deal, chambers - vermalen deal, ospina - cesc and miquel deals sanchez c / l monies and other monies recovered from wages and old installment based deals this is the same with welbeck i would imagine if not then poldolski will be sold in jan to cover this as i think he was going to be sold and this would have covered welbecks transfer more or less also and people do nt always realize that arsenal have money coming in from more than one source to cover transfers not just puma and emirates deals we have property arm of the club which makes money for transfers also outstanding debts we are owed of old transfers we receive each year on song cesc maybe van persie and all other structured deals in installment payments sales we just flogged miquel as an example and all the monies from released wages and youths sold its a bit to complex to just say we have a net spend of xyz when arsenal do nt even make the budget public so they have no starting point from which to go from i bet you we have broke even or even made a slight profit as we are self sustaining it would make sense that we can break even or at least make the net spend under # 10 million each year at least screw then all we are the arsenal we do thing our way

He clearly knew Wenger would never do either, so correctly and shrewdly, opted for a proper manager at a fast improving club, even for less money than we offered him to stay.

I hope I'm wrong but this could be the most damaging win when it comes to transfers... winning 1 game, after about 20 minutes of really good play, is of little consequence in the grand scheme of things... only those with the most selfish of intentions would suggest otherwise... the only reason we're even in this predicament, where were celebrating our first victory of 2018 against a bottom half squad who is managed by possibly the only individual more antiquated than our manager, is because of Wenger's ridiculous mishandling of his contract last year combined with his mishandling of the contracts of our top players this year; a fact that he himself admitted to... so before you get too excited about the possibilities of our current roster don't forget what has happened over the last several years and pray to the gods of football that real quality reinforcements like Auba are on the way, which could have happened years ago for less money and we might have been holding a trophy of some significance, or this brief respite will be followed by the usual mediocrity and stagnation

This is the same club that refused to sanction the transfer of any of their players in the other direction, so do they really think that a direct rival should just roll over for them because they have more money, if a lot less history and class?

Facts of the season so far, we have half the points of the league leaders, less points than this time last year, only two fit first team defenders, more money in the bank than ever before.how much proof do you need that wengers job is to make money for his boss and not win trophies.

I mean Christ Danny Welbeck was let go for just slightly less than lucas Perez and Wenger wasn't even in the country when he was bought in, what does that tell you about the club and its ambitions????? if you added up the money spent on oriental and Japanese players who we NEVER see play in an arsenal shirt over the last ten years, we could have brought in half the Barcelona side including Messi so you tell me what THATS all about??? its a disgrace, and Giroud acting like a football god because he scored and equalizer really just epitomises the whole messed up attitude and THAT starts with Wenger and his «its not my fault it was the ref» attitude its stinks

I hope liverpool who will have less rest and play two conscecutive away games rip this team to shreds so that the harsh reality can creep into the deluded ones amd silent stan starts losing money

3 is a silent pick em so money line the game with a dog of 3 pts or less, 85 % of teams that cover 3 points as dogs win the game outright so why give the books any more than you have to, make sure you take dogs in first half ONLY, i cant stress this enough, more times than not if a dog will cover the game, (big dogs +7 or higher) they will show up early and you do not want to get screwed in the 2nd half by blowing the cover, these are things the sports books never would tell you but surely will save you a lot of aggravation in the LONG RUN