Sentences with phrase «have much money coming»

After all, you will most likely not have much money coming in each month once you leave the work force.

I don't have much money coming in so I'm still having to — you know, I don't have a huge amount of money to be putting on debt service and paying down student loans and everything.

Not exact matches

I believe that every human alive has a purpose — a calling — that goes much deeper than simply enjoying a career or the money that comes with it.

When it comes to streaming, Nelly's representatives or the people in charge of the streaming services would need to be ones to publicly reveal how much money he's getting, and they're not very forthcoming on that front.

«If the president wants to come up to me and tell me to my face that it was a terrible tragedy and how it should never have happened and maintain telling us how nothing is going to be done about it, I'm going to happily ask him how much money he received from the National Rifle Association,» Gonzalez said.

People who paid much more than they expected to change their mailing addresses have some money coming back.

Much of the money Rainmaker makes now comes from producing two Barbie movies a year for Mattel, a long fall from the days this same studio was inducted into the Smithsonian Institution, having been nominated by Bill Gates himself.

Founded in July, Version One has already raised $ 15 million in capital to make investments — much of that money came from local Vancouver tech entrepreneurs who wanted to give back to their community.

Whether or not you have to file comes down to your filing status, your age, and how much money you made.

It is possible to get through this experience and come out the other side much stronger for it, St. Claire insists: «This is a rite of passage that will launch you into the League of Business Badassery in which, once you are out of the money hellhole, you will be unstoppable,» thanks to having confronted your fears and stuck to your dreams.

Entrepreneurs can become so focused on the money that's either coming in fast or not as much as they had hoped.

«For the investors who don't have as much money, they'll probably come and look at Calgary as an alternative,» says local real estate agent Kirby Cox.

He noted that much of the pro-legalization money in California has come from entrepreneurs seeking to capitalize on what is projected to be a $ 6.5 billion market for marijuana by 2020.

Part of your risk tolerance comes from your time horizon: If you need the money in two to three years, you shouldn't take on as much risk as you would if you didn't need the money for 40 years.

When it comes to your money and your home, you can never have too much information.

«As much as Google appears to loathe playing the patent game, spending money to prevent litigation rather than innovating, it may have come to realize that it has no other alternative,» Greene wrote.

Before you go about applying, however, you should come up with a plan for limiting the amount of time you have to use it so you don't sink too much money into the interest.

Have as much money as possible coming in from passive income.

I liken this to a scuba diver who goes down and he has about an hour's worth of air, and then he's got ta come back up again and either get another tank or refill his tank, so you're limited on how much air you can have if you're scuba diving, but in business, unless you have a scuba diving type business, you don't wan na have to keep having to refill your tank, and so that's the issue that I see faces a lot of entrepreneurs and startups, is the amount of time and energy it takes to raise money for your business.

If you're a new investor, the question of whether you should buy index funds or ETFs ultimately comes down to your risk tolerance and how much money you have to invest.

«In most cases they're coming from much more expensive markets, and in some cases are just trying to get money out of the country to a safe haven,» he said, adding that China's stepped - up restrictions on the outflow of capital has probably had a bigger impact.

What they're saying and what they argue is that the issue is that the demographics which are changing dramatically... You know the baby boomers aren't buying as much, the Millennial's don't have as much money, at least in the United States, but around the world even in China where we've had a dramatic reduction in the growth in population, we don't have the youth that's coming on in relationship with the accumulation of wealth that the previous generations have had.

Prices will be found at which the remaining active funds will be willing to transact — those prices will simply be much lower, to ensure adequate protection for the funds, given that they haven't done the work necessary to be comfortable with the purchases, or alternatively, given that they need to pay for that work, and that the money has to come from somewhere.

«If the president wants to come up to me and tell me to my face that it was a terrible tragedy and how it should never have happened and maintain telling us how nothing is going to be done about it,» Emma Gonzalez said, «I'm going to happily ask him how much money he received from the National Rifle Association.»

As I've come to discover, investing is about much more than money.

 The Harper government's decision last year to write off every penny of the auto aid and thus build it all into last year's deficit calculation (which I questioned at the time as curious and even misleading) has already been proven wrong. Since the money was already «written off» by Ottawa as a loss (on grounds that they had little confidence it would be repaid — contradicting their own assurances at the same time that it was an «investment,» not a bail - out), any repayment will come as a gain that can be recorded in the budget on the revenue side. Jim Flaherty has learned from past Finance Ministers (especially Paul Martin) that it's always politically better to make the budget situation look worse than it is (even when the bottom has fallen out of the balance), thus positioning yourself to triumphantly announce «surprising good news» (due, no doubt, to «careful fiscal management») down the road. The auto package could thus generate as much as $ 10 billion in «surprising good news» for Ottawa in the years to come (depending on the ultimate worth of the public equity share).

He'd have just 90 days to come up with the $ 300,000, and he'd have to come up with the rest of the money for the much larger tax bill by the next April 15.

Actually few months before what is happening now in my country I saw big flood flooding over the city but not in to my place of my living... although people were some screaming and some as riding it smiling but all were being washed away... then have asked a freind about it who said it might mean no much money or business will be coming to me which I doubted if it meant that, but today I know what it was about...!

But, when it comes to building an effective church, in the long run it appears that too much money has the reverse effect.

Last night at a work party this exact comment came up about how when they visited the Vatican they were disgusted by by how much money they have and why they don't sell it and feed the poor.

Do you have any idea how much money we spend on keeping track of people in this country who like sharia law??? WHY are we allowing more to come here, and up the costs and risks even more?

And, as though this foreigner had not already done so much more than enough, the story continues that «on the morrow when he departed, he took out some money and gave it to the host and said to him, «Take care of him and whatever more you spend, when I come again, I will repay!»»

Speaking of Obama's donations... Obama doesn't make that much money, the most money he has came from his book that he wrote.

Her extreme and backwards views will come out, question is when and how much money has she waisted running once it comes out.

Money matters, but not as much as we've come to think.

It also saddens me that we spend so much money on weapons of war, knowing that as soon as we make a better one, the others will only come up with even better ones causing us to have to spend more and more, that could be better used on more productive causes.

I was going to come up with something exciting and wonderful but I'm still in the midst of trying to save money / use up everything I already have, so you do still get a recipe — it just doesn't really have all that much to do with paninis.

If Sanchez and Ozil bounce at seasons end, Arsenal have to come off much money to find SUITABLE replacements if they continue to bark about trophies.

Arsenal don't have the power with neither Jack, nor Mesut and thus so need to cough up the money or the players won't sign, because a footballers career is short and as much as you love your club, when the offer comes you have to make the best decision for yourself.

Realistically, having that much money and coming from where he did, well, he needed time to adjust.

look criticise wenger for his failures, demand a change i get all of that, but do nt disrespect and insult a man who has done so much more for the club than this joke of a man named Konstantin and do nt come with the argument that the fans spent money on the club while Wenger earned money..

I was never try to insinuate that it's year 2000 in terms of spending and all that.Look at all the clubs you mentioned.They were Man Utd, Chelsea, Man wateva, PSG and Real Madrid.Arsenal has nothing on them when it comes to money for transfers.The majority of these clubs also chalk a lot of success or have very wealthy owners who own a higher percentage of shares which adds to the money already available for transfers.If they want to spend extravagantly let them do but not Arsenal.We must not compare ourselves to them in terms of spending.Lemar is a good player and I like him very much but he's just not worth # 80.

Our player of the season so far?Certainly the most consistent.JACK AND OZIL CONTRACTS - just get them signed up for F *** S SAKE.Jack doesn't want to go anywhere and Ozil will have his choice of big clubs to choose from if allowed to be able to go on a free.How about giving out a statement of our ambitions (yeah right) and show were prepared to pay whatever it takes (up to the point of being ridiculous) to SIGN the best and KEEP the best» These two are the best we have so get them sorted early to send out a message of how serious we intend to be.AUBAMEYANG - So what if he has a contract.So did Sanchez.Offer the right money to Dortmund and the player and he will be ours.What is there to question over this deal?He is a proven goalscorer.We have just lost one.Get the deal done.GIROUD - Get rid of him to Dortmund if they want him either by selling or if it sweetens the deal just loan him till the end of the season.He was a back up when Sanchez was here and will be on the mix of back ups if Auba signs.He has a World Cup squad to fight for just to be considered so needs to be playing every week.We do not need him if Auba signs and would demand better than him if the deal fails to happen.Just get rid.JONNY EVANS - I'm not sure.Agree Kos needs nursing through games and we do not have consistent performers to come in if he is injured or rested mainly due to both Chambers and Holdimg not progressing through as much as we first thought and hoped for.Gooners have always been patient and supportive of the youngsters as they have come through but question marks to the whole coaching staff as to why these two seem to have stalled as much as they have done.Steve Bould - What do you do?You should be ashamed.

They have a shelf life of 8/10 years at the very top if they are lucky so who can begrudge them the opportunity to make hay whilst the sun is shining... am not saying Sanchez is not money driven but the way the guy plays i can mortgage my life he actually enjoys the game, enjoys wining first and foremost then money comes 2nd... like the author of the article rightly pointed out, he was in Messi's shadow at Barca and could not express himself fully, now he is at a club where he is the main man and given a free role and license to express himself and i very much doubt if he will want to go to a club like Madrid (as been rumoured in the dailies today) to relieve the bad experience he suffered at Barca because let us face facts, he is never going to displace CR7 as the main man, so even if Madrid sells Benzema or Bale to make room for him he will be back to the same position he was at Barca, this time he will be playing 2nd fiddle to CR7 so my guess is all the Madrid talks is been fed the press by his agents to drive a hard bargain when contract extension talks resumes.....

because he has come out and publicly admitted that there was no massive resources available like he has now, but now he has them as he said the club is now in a much stronger position he will no doubt put the right money out for the right player.

Unlike many I'm not scared at all if he leaves.You know why?Because I've seen better players leave the club and seen where we ended up.He's very good and world class but not as good as many think.Forget stats for a moment and look at his quality.I also hope the mistake of keeping Mr. Hold up at the club would not be made.Here at Arsenal we compromise a lot and we always ignore the cracks until it's too late.Wait till Lacazette goes for a three or four month injury.Then we'll know we never learn.I hope Bellerin doesn't make this mistake of leaving Arsenal.He has so so much to learn.His game still lacks that something.He needs to know how to maximise his potentials and be consistent.That will only come with more playing time and patience.Arsene should not even think of letting him go as we will have to spend money on a RB and besides we need him.

In effect much of the money at the club comes from the fans and with some of the highest ticket prices in Europe, the fans have the right to have the highest expectations.

Wenger manage to please them by spending few money and still making the club have profit.Imagine all those clubs outside the top 4 crying for the CL place as there is so much money involved, that why Wenger is untouchable by the board.He is over achieving compare to what he spend and he does not spend in order to win but to compete.Don t come with your crap talk about Ozil and Sanchez, their buy did not solve nothing of the serious needs of the team, it was Hollywood signing just to woaw around people and supporters.

I only go to the games a few times during the season since I don't live in England, for those who do, we need to defy those damn stewards and raise the temperature at the games, that's the only practical solution I can come up with, we are not the ones who buy the players and all the noise we have made on social media and elsewhere keeps falling on deaf ears, they will not listen to our calls for players, let's go to the games and turn the library upside down as much as we can, we can not give those players a moments rest, we, the fans pay them [gate takings and TV subscriptions], you can't take my money and not give 100 %, Wenger can pamper them, we would not, they don't read much that is being said on social media but they can't ignore our chants at the stadium.

The days of players of such limited ability paid millions of pounds of OUR (by this I mean supporters) money are coming to an end.For this Wenger has himself to blame as his tired broken down ways have been found out.Yes of course we want our players to be loyal but the players who we have called out over the years SÁNCHEZ RVP THE BLOKE WHOOSE DAD WASHED ELEPHANTS NASRI were all Wenger signings and showed as much loyalty and gratitude to him as much as the Club.Sign the right players and put them in a winning team is the first step.Win trophies and Pay them well and then you will see Loyalty.