Sentences with phrase «head injuries in crashes»

http://www.grayandwhitelaw.com/ Many victims of auto accidents do nt realize that they may have suffered a head injury in a crash.

Not exact matches

For example, if you are in a car crash and lose your sight in one eye due to a head injury, an AD&D policy would pay out a portion of your policy's face amount to help you pay for medical expenses or simply to help you get back on your feet.

That makes it important to get your kids to wear bicycle helmets every time they ride, especially since head injuries are the most common cause of death and serious injury in bicycle crashes.

If you are in a crash and baby is facing front, their head can flop forward to such a degree that gruesome injuries like internal decapitation can occur.

In reality, the bar or tray may actually cause harm to a baby in a crash because trays rarely contain enough padding to prevent head or chest injuries when the baby strikes the tray with great forcIn reality, the bar or tray may actually cause harm to a baby in a crash because trays rarely contain enough padding to prevent head or chest injuries when the baby strikes the tray with great forcin a crash because trays rarely contain enough padding to prevent head or chest injuries when the baby strikes the tray with great force.

It ranked in the top 5 for crash testing compared to other top brands, and for head injuries, tested higher than federal safety standards.

Called Next Generation (Next Gen), the car seats offer 360 Degree Protection with Head Safety Technology - designed to reduce the risk of head injury and provides protection from all sides in the event of a vehicle crHead Safety Technology - designed to reduce the risk of head injury and provides protection from all sides in the event of a vehicle crhead injury and provides protection from all sides in the event of a vehicle crash.

Be sure to use the top tether: It will limit the motion of the car seat and your child's head in a crash and reduce the risk of injury.

Head injuries are the leading cause of death and permanent disability in bicycle crashes, accounting for more than 60 percent of bike - related deaths.

(FROM DAILY VOICE) A chain - reaction head - on crash involving four vehicles resulted in several injuries Sundayafternoon in Montebello.It occurred around 1:50 p.m., on Haverstraw Road (Route 202) west of Mayer Drive, said Ramapo police.

Published in the journal, Accident Analysis & Prevention, the findings are based on computer - simulated reconstructions of actual bike crashes in which the riders» wore no helmet and sustained head injuries.

Head restraints extended to the highest position go 25 mm over the downward movement limit, which can cause them to unexpectedly move down in the event of a crash and increase the risk of injury.

But the defects raise another question, in my mind, at least: Are airbags as safe as we assume, for preventing death and injury in head - on car crashes?

Measures taken from the head, neck, and chest indicate low risk of injuries to these body regions in a crash of this severity.

In addition, to guard against whiplash injuries following a collision from the rear, the front seats are fitted with crash - activated head restraints as standard.

Conequence: IN THE EVENT OF A CRASH, THE SEATBACK AND HEAD RESTRAINT MAY MOVE REARWARD, INCREASING THE RISK OF INJURY.

(Following discussions with the automaker about the head injury criterion in the first crash test, the second offset test was conducted.

Measures taken from the dummy indicate a low risk of any significant injuries in a crash of this severity, including head injury risk from the head contacting steering wheel rim.

The frontal and side curtain airbags worked reasonably well together to protect the head from injury in the crash test (second test shown).

Measures taken from the head, chest, and left leg indicate low risk of injuries to these body regions in a crash of this severity.

In 1999, IIHS researchers analyzed more than 5,000 insurance claims and determined that drivers with head restraints with good geometric ratings were 24 percent less likely than drivers with poor - rated head restraints to sustain neck injuries in rear - end crasheIn 1999, IIHS researchers analyzed more than 5,000 insurance claims and determined that drivers with head restraints with good geometric ratings were 24 percent less likely than drivers with poor - rated head restraints to sustain neck injuries in rear - end crashein rear - end crashes.

We didn't record high injury forces on any of the dummies in the back seats, but in a crash at a different speed or configuration the heads of back - seat passengers would be at risk without side airbags,» Lund notes.

This isn't the first time the Institute has tested a BMW with head protection airbags (see «Airbags for heads reduce injuries in side impact crashes,» Dec. 27, 1997).

Measures taken from the head, chest, and legs indicate low risk of injuries to these body regions in a crash of this severity.

IIHS rates vehicles good, acceptable, marginal or poor based on performance in high - speed front and side crash tests, a roof strength test for rollover protection, plus evaluations of seats / head restraints for protection against neck injuries in rear impacts.

A 2008 Institute analysis of insurance claims found that, all other factors being the same, drivers of vehicles with seat / head restraint combinations rated good in Institute evaluations were 15 percent less likely to sustain neck injuries in rear - end crashes than drivers of vehicles with poor head restraints (see «Neck injury risk is lower if seats and head restraints are rated good,» March 15, 2008).

«Massive head injuries would have been likely for a driver and possible for a passenger in a similar real - world crash.

Untethered restraints can allow a child's upper body to move too far forward in a crash, risking facial and head injuries.

Almost 10,000 occupant deaths occur each year in side impact crashes, and head injuries cause more than half of these deaths.

Fords are only models to earn top rating; most seat / head restraints provide inadequate protection against neck injuries in rear crashes

Driver — Measures taken from the dummy indicate that head injuries would be possible in a crash of this severity.

Conequence: If the head restraint posts are not fully engaging in the seat back, the head restraint may loosen or dislodge, increasing the risk of injury in a crash.

Police crash data from 25 states between 2009 and 2015 for vehicle models where the systems were sold as optional reduced rates of single - vehicle, sideswipe and head - on crashes by 11 percent, and injuries in such crashes by 21 percent.

Without airbag protection, people in real - world small overlap frontal crashes can sustain head injuries from direct contact with the A-pillar, dashboard or window sill or by hitting trees, poles or other objects.

IIHS rates vehicles in a moderate overlap front crash, small overlap front crash, side impact and rollover test, and evaluates seat / head restraints for protection against neck injuries in rear impact collisions.

Yugos have performed poorly in the government's crash tests; 1986 and 1987 models offered insufficient protection against head injuries.

A 2008 Institute analysis of insurance claims found that, all other factors being the same, drivers of vehicles with seat / head restraint combinations rated good in Institute evaluations were 15 percent less likely to sustain neck injuries in rear - end crashes than drivers of vehicles with poor head restraints.

The third test measures how well vehicle seats and head restraints protect people against neck injury in low - speed rear crashes.

The buckles are bigger and the belts heavier than usual, but Ford reckons they reduce chest, head and neck injuries in the event of a crash.

The hazards: if the head restraint posts are not fully engaging in the seat back, the head restraint may loosen or dislodge, increasing the risk of injury in a crash.

Measures taken from the head, neck, chest, and left leg indicate low risk of injuries to these body regions in a crash of this severity.

In each test, measures taken from the head, neck, chest, and one leg indicate low risk of injuries to these body regions in a crash of this severitIn each test, measures taken from the head, neck, chest, and one leg indicate low risk of injuries to these body regions in a crash of this severitin a crash of this severity.

Without airbag protection, people in real - world small overlap frontal crashes can sustain head injuries from direct contact with the windshield pillar, dashboard or window sill or by hitting trees, poles or other objects.

IIHS rates vehicles good, acceptable, marginal or poor based on performance in a moderate overlap frontal crash, small overlap frontal crash, side impact and rollover, plus evaluations of seat / head restraints for protection against neck injuries in rear impacts.

Driver — Measures taken from the dummy indicate that serious head injuries would be possible in a crash of this severity.

The ratings are based on how well they protect passengers in front and side crash tests, in rollovers via a roof strength test, and in simulated rear impacts to evaluate seat and head restraints for protection against neck injuries.

IIHS rates vehicles good, acceptable, marginal or poor based on performance in a moderate overlap frontal crash, small overlap frontal crash, side impact and rollover, as well as evaluations of seat / head restraints for protection against neck injuries in rear impacts.

Real crashes of this type, said the IIHS, result in head injuries from contact with outboard structures or intruding objects such as trees or poles.

The earlier model also came up short for roof strength, which is important for protecting occupants in a rollover crash, and for head restraints, which help prevent neck injuries in a rear crash.

Measures taken from the head, neck, and right leg indicate low risk of injuries to these body regions in a crash of this severity.