Sentences with phrase «head protection ratings»

These vehicles are rated separately, except that the structural ratings and rear passenger injury and head protection ratings for both vehicles are based on both tests.

The injury ratings for the driver and the head protection ratings for both the driver and passenger are based on both tests.

Also, the rear passenger injury and head protection ratings are based on the two tests with side airbags.

Injury and head protection ratings are based on only the latest test, but structural ratings are based on all three tests.

The injury and head protection ratings for the driver are based on just the second test; measures for the driver in the first test were not used because the seating procedure was not comparable to other tested vehicles.

Injury and head protection ratings for the rear seat passenger are based on both tests.

These vehicles are rated separately, except that the structure ratings for both vehicles are based on both tests, as are rear passenger dummy injury and head protection ratings, because no changes were made affecting structure or rear seat occupants.

The injury ratings for the rear passenger and the head protection ratings for both the driver and passenger are based on both tests.

These cars are rated separately, except that the structure ratings for both vehicles are based on both tests, as are rear dummy injury and head protection ratings, because no changes were made to the rear occupant compartment.

Driver dummy injury and head protection ratings for the 2009 model are assigned by the Institute as part of side crash test verification.

These vehicles are rated separately, except that the structural ratings for both vehicles are based on both tests, as are rear dummy injury and head protection ratings, because no changes were made to the rear occupant compartment.

Not exact matches

Karen Mills, former head of the U.S. Small Business Administration and the keynote speaker at the event said, «Small business owners are seeing the number of alternative sources for financing their companies grow at an unprecedented rate, and while this is a good thing in terms of increasing access to capital, borrower protections have not caught up.

Overall, the Riddell 360 provided the most protection against closed head injury and the Adams a2000 the least, despite rating the best against concussion.

The independent Insurance Institute for Highway Safety gave the A6 its highest rating of «Good» in the moderate - overlap frontal - offset, side - impact and roof - strength tests, while the A6's seat and head restraint design was also rated «Good» for whiplash protection in rear impacts.

Its seat / head restraint design was rated «Good» for whiplash protection in rear impacts.

Its seat / head restraint design also rates «Good» for whiplash protection in rear impacts.

The F - 150's seat / head restraint design was also rated «Good» for whiplash protection in rear impacts.

Its seat / head restraint design was also rated «Good» for whiplash protection in rear impacts.

The IIHS rated the Sentra an» «acceptable»» for frontal off - set crash test, a» «poor»» for side impact, and a» «poor»» for rear crash protection and head restraint.

It also earned a top rating for its seats / head restraint design for whiplash protection in rear impacts.

In contrast, the Grand Caravan with its optional side airbags is rated good for head protection.

Ratings reflect injury measures recorded on two instrumented SID - IIs dummies, assessment of head protection, and the vehicle's structural performance during the impact.

The Hyundai Santa Fe, which also has standard side airbags with head protection, earned an acceptable rating.

Winners of the gold award have earned good ratings in the Institute's frontal offset and side impact tests, and their seat / head restraints are rated good for protection against neck injuries in rear impacts.

The Versa's seat / head restraint design was rated «Good» for whiplash protection in rear impacts.

The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety awarded the Corolla its top rating of Good in the moderate - overlap front - impact, side - impact, roof strength and head restraint (whiplash protection) tests.

In the side pole impact of the XF, chest protection was rated as weak and the car's seat and head restraint provided marginal whiplash protection.

The extended cab, or SuperCab, earns good ratings in the moderate overlap front, side, roof strength and head restraint evaluations but just a marginal rating for occupant protection in a small overlap front crash.

The F - 150 crew cab, which Ford calls the SuperCrew, earns good ratings for occupant protection in all five IIHS crashworthiness evaluations — small overlap front, moderate overlap front, side, roof strength and head restraint evaluations.

Vehicles that earn a good or acceptable rating for small overlap protection and good ratings in the moderate overlap front, side, roof strength and head restraint evaluations qualify for Top Safety Pick.

IIHS rates vehicles good, acceptable, marginal or poor based on performance in high - speed front and side crash tests, a roof strength test for rollover protection, plus evaluations of seats / head restraints for protection against neck injuries in rear impacts.

The seat / head restraints in the Optima are the only ones the Institute tested this time around that earn the top rating of good for occupant protection in rear crashes.

In the frontal offset crash test where it scored 14.93 out of maximum 16 points, head and neck protection of front seat occupants was rated as good and protection of their legs and chest area was termed as acceptable.

Ratings reflect injury measures recorded on 2 instrumented SID - IIs dummies representing a 5th percentile woman, assessment of head protection countermeasures, and the vehicle's structural performance during the impact.

To qualify as a 2016 Safety Pick +, a vehicle is required to earn good ratings in the five crashworthiness tests, which are the small overlap front, moderate overlap front, side, roof strength, and head restraints, as well as receive an advanced or superior rating for front crash protection.

Strengths of this model include luxury options, excellent powertrain warranty, available Uconnect technology, tow ratings up to 30,000 pounds, Best - in - class features across multiple categories, and impressive powertrain offerings, 6 Speakers, Black Side Windows Trim And Black Front Windshield Trim, Clearcoat Paint, Full - Size Spare Tire Stored Underbody W / Crankdown, Variable Intermittent Wipers, Fully Galvanized Steel Panels, Black Front Bumper W / 2 Tow Hooks, Fully Automatic Aero - Composite Halogen Headlamps W / Delay - Off, Wheels: 18 X 8.0 Steel, Deep Tinted Glass, Steel Spare Wheel, Front Bumper Sight Shields, Interior Trim - Inc: Deluxe Sound Insulation, Metal - Look Instrument Panel Insert, Chrome And Metal - Look Interior Accents, Manual Adjustable Front Head Restraints And Manual Adjustable Rear Head Restraints, Systems Monitor, Cruise Control W / Steering Wheel Controls, Manual Tilt Steering Column, 40/20/40 Split Bench Seat, 4 - Way Passenger Seat - Inc: Manual Recline And Fore / Aft Movement, Power Door Locks W / Autolock Feature, Manual Air Conditioning, Full Cloth Headliner, Engine: 5.7 L V8 Hemi Vvt, Part - Time Four - Wheel Drive, Auto Locking Hubs, 730Cca Maintenance - Free Battery W / Run Down Protection, Single Stainless Steel Exhaust, Front Anti-Roll Bar, Multi-Link Front Suspension W / Coil Springs, 4390 # Maximum Payload, 50 State Emissions, Gvwr: 11, 300 Lbs, Transmission: 6 - Speed Automatic 66Rfe, Mechanical Limited Slip Differential, Class V Towing W / Harness, Hitch And Trailer Sway Control, Leaf Rear Suspension W / Leaf Springs, Manual Transfer Case, 3.73 Rear Axle Ratio, Hd Shock Absorbers, Electronically Controlled Throttle, 32 Gal.

Fords are only models to earn top rating; most seat / head restraints provide inadequate protection against neck injuries in rear crashes

«Like the previous generation of the Edge, the 2015 model earns good ratings for occupant protection in the moderate overlap front, side, roof strength and head restraint evaluations.»

Ram., the SRT ® Hellcat design, HEMI, High Altitude, Imported From Detroit, the Jeep ® grille design, the Jeep ® Vehicle Profile design, Journey, Journey Crew, LaneSense, Laramie, Laramie Longhorn, Laredo, Latitude, Liberty, Liberty Jet, Mega Cab, the Mopar Owner Connect design, Mopar Vehicle Protection, My Sky, the On The Job design, Oscar Mike, Outdoorsman, Overland, Overland Summit, Pacifica, ParkSense, ParkView, Patriot, Pentastar, Power Wagon, Quad Cab, Quadra - Drive, Quadra - Lift, Quadra - Trac, Quadra - Trac I, Quadra - Trac II, R / T, Ram 1500 Express, RamBox, Ram Jam, the Ram's Head logo, Ram ProMaster, Ram ProMaster City, Ram Work Grade, Renegade, Rock - Trac, Rubicon, Sahara, the Scat Pack design, Selec - Speed, Selec - Terrain, Selec - Trac, Selec - Track, Sentry Key, Snow Chief, SRT8, Stow»n Go, Stow N Place, Super Bee, SXT, Tech Authority, Tigershark, TorqueFlite, Town & Country, Town & Country Limited Platinum, Tradesman, Trailhawk, Trail Rated, Tru - Lok, Uconnect, Viper, Wrangler, Wrangler Freedom Edition and Yellow Jacket are registered trademarks and the 1941 Seventy Five Years Jeep ® Vehicle Profile design, Active Drive I, Active - Level, Air - Catcher, Air - Grabber, Challenger SRT ® Hellcat, the e & leaf design, Freedom Drive I, the HFE design, Keyless Enter â $ ˜ n Go, KeySense, Scat Pack, SRT ® Hellcat and Stow â $ ˜ n Vac are trademarks of FCA US LLC.

In a second test of a 2009 model with new assembly procedures in place, the side curtain airbag deployed fully, and the head protection for both dummies was rated Good.

What's more, the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety recognized the model with its highest rating of «Good» in the roof - strength, side - impact and moderate - overlap frontal - offset crash evaluations while the model's seat / head restraint design was recognized with a «Good» rating for whiplash protection in the event of rear impacts.

In the full - width rigid barrier test, protection of the head, neck and chest of the rear passenger dummy was rated as poor and no points were scored for this dummy.

In the full - width rigid barrier test, readings of chest compression in the rear passenger dummy indicated poor protection for this part of the body and protection of the head was rated as marginal, based on measured decelerations.

In the side barrier test, the side curtain airbag did not deploy as intended and, while dummy readings were good, the score for the head was penalised and protection for this part of the body was rated as adequate.

These penalties, together with marginal dummy readings, resulted in a poor rating of the head protection and an adequate rating for the neck.

Neck tensile forces were also very high and protection of both the head and the neck was rated as poor.

However, in the side barrier test, the head of the 10 year dummy contacted the metal frame of the folding roof and protection was rated as poor, based on the resulting high decelerations.

Protection of the head and the chest was rated as adequate and dummy readings indicated good protection of all other bodProtection of the head and the chest was rated as adequate and dummy readings indicated good protection of all other bodprotection of all other body regions.

In the side impact, protection for the head was rated as marginal.

The Grand Cherokee's seat / head restraint design was rated «Good» for whiplash protection in rear impacts.