As a scientist myself, I want to pass on a very important piece of information to everyone — do not believe what you read in the summaries or
headlines of scientific studies!
Not exact matches
The Guardian's report
of a recently published
scientific article was
headlined «Religious children are meaner than their secular counterparts,
study finds».
These recent
studies certainly won't generate the
headlines the initial Duke
study did, but residents in northeastern Pennsylvania now have additional
scientific evidence to answer their questions about the role
of oil and gas production plays in their area.
Everybody loves a good
headline about the proven health benefits
of dark chocolate or red wine, but
scientific studies extolling the virtues
of «sinful» substances are rarely so cut and dry.
What is lost in many
headlines is that
scientific studies usually express their results as a change in risk
of developing a disease, not a direct causation, and very few diseases are caused by one chemical or one food additive.
Ben Lillie and Virginia Hughes began a TEDxNewYork conversation about science and culture at Untitled Space in Tribeca by taking a look at why this kind
of headline whiplash happens in the press: because science journalism has been structured around reporting on single
studies as they are published in
scientific journals.
They were saying we need more
study, and sloppy
headline seeking journalism in the popular, not
scientific press trumpeted a bit
of sensationalist hyperbole.
In one
study, he and his colleagues packaged the basic science
of climate change into fake newspaper articles bearing two very different
headlines --»
Scientific Panel Recommends Anti-Pollution Solution to Global Warming» and «
Scientific Panel Recommends Nuclear Solution to Global Warming» — and then tested how citizens with different values responded.
So we get a sensational
headline or teaser and a short report highlighting the most extreme or sensational element
of the
scientific study — not necessarily the incremental gain made by the scientist, nor the unknowns remaining.