Not exact matches
This week, UnitedHealth Group, the country's biggest
health insurer, said it would
review and, if necessary, adjust «facility
claims for the most severe and costly ED visits for patients enrolled in the company's commercial and Medicare Advantage plans,» the trade publication Modern Healthcare reported today.
Ranking at No. 855 on the Inc. 5000, this
health company offers peer
review programs to more than 60 workers» compensation and managed - care organizations to assist in the
claims management process.
These grand
claims and promises are, alas, not met and thus are clearly overstated given that the authors find such meager evidence of
health benefits of religion in the more than 1,200 studies and 400 research
reviews they examine.
In 2009, the European Food Safety Authority
reviewed the science and found no justification for
claims about the
health risks from BCM7.
After going through a public comment period, the petition is now under
review as a qualified
health claim.
Consumers» responses to
health claims in the context of other on - pack nutrition information: a systematic
review.
Food regulatory agencies should
review fast - food websites to ensure compliance with the qualifying criteria for nutrition content and
health claim regulations.
Personally, I find it rather ironic that you're lecturing the blog author on the rigor of language, when, faced with the need to support the
claims made by a documentary that has faced absolutely no real standards of intellectual rigor or merit (the kind of evidence you apparently find convincing), you have so far managed to produce a study with a sample size too small to conclude anything, a
review paper that basically summarized well known connections between vaginal and amniotic flora and poor outcomes in labor and birth before attempting to rescue what would have been just another OB
review article with a few attention grabbing sentences about long term
health implications, and a
review article published in a trash journal.
Many of the headline
health claims being made can't be substantiated, the sources they cite are not in line with
health policy, graphs set out to mislead, and these adverts may also fail to meet the Government's own requirement for
claims to be supported by peer —
reviewed work.
A
review of breastmilk substitute advertising to
health professionals», which analysed some of the
claims made in advertising to healthcare professionals.
Your article «Low doses of common chemical have science in a quandary» (News, Dec. 26)
claims that exposure to low doses of Bisphenol - A (BPA) may lead to «possible widespread
health risks,» and mentions a recent scientific
review by the National Toxicology Program (NTP) as the evidence for this
claim.
A nine - member
review panel of
health experts, established by the cosmetics industry with the FDA's support, disputed GIB's
claim in a report last year.
The paper
reviewed the history of insurance
claims, electronic
health records, and disease registries used for pharmacovigilance and drug safety.
A scientist at
Health Canada has sued his boss, the Ottawa Citizen reports,
claiming that his effort to modify the label of testosterone drugs led her to call him mentally unstable and give him poor performance
reviews.
«Most consumers take mobile
health app
claims at face value, and think that because they're available through a trusted retailer like the iTunes Store, they must have been
reviewed by the FDA, which isn't usually the case,» Cortez says.
The proposal would require FDA
reviews of e-cigarette products and force makers to stop
claiming health benefits until the science is in.
The companies provided a scientific basis for their proposed
health claim,
reviewed the safety of the foods containing these fatty acids, and described the nature of the
health claim they wanted to make.
The European Food Safety Agency, which is
reviewing thousands of companies»
health claims, has so far thrown out the vast majority of them, which could force companies to remove the
claims from their labels and ads.
Public
Health England (PHE), a governmental body the equivalent of our Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), recently released an evidence review claiming that e-cigarettes are 95 percent less harmful to health than combustible cigar
Health England (PHE), a governmental body the equivalent of our Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), recently released an evidence
review claiming that e-cigarettes are 95 percent less harmful to
health than combustible cigar
health than combustible cigarettes.
Four U.S. representatives — prompted by an aggressive ad campaign by People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, which
claimed that baby rhesus macaques at the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child
Health and Human Development lab of Stephen Suomi were being ripped from their mothers at birth and being mentally traumatized — called on NIH to conduct a bioethical
review of the lab.
I was able to read and
review The Sirtfood Diet, a plan that
claims to help you lose 7 pounds in 7 days, all with the power of what they call «Sirtfoods» which are essentially antioxidants, polyphenols, and other
health supportive compounds.
Eggs are not considered
health promoting nutritionally speaking.http: / / www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18400699 Eggs have been linked with heart failurehttp: / / www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18954578 As well as type 2 diabetes.http: / / www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2628696/?tool=pubmed Furthermore, in the Canadian Journal of Cardiology, David Spence, David Jenkins (the inventor of the glycemic index) and Jean Davignon (director of atherosclerosis research group) posted a
review on eggs
claiming that the egg industry has been downplaying the
health risks of eggs through misleading advertisements.
Trying the latest and coolest «fad» diet that received rave
reviews for achieving (insert your favorite
health claim) Lose Weight!
With all of these
health - enhancing
claims, the only seemingly negative
reviews from those who have tried oil pulling are the taste, texture, and amount of time before results appear.
Although as a general rule, dietary supplement labeling and marketing are not allowed to make disease prevention or treatment
claims, the U.S. FDA has for some foods and dietary supplements
reviewed the science, concluded that there is significant scientific agreement, and published specifically worded allowed
health claims.
In July 2012,
Health Canada accepted the application after reviewing the clinical trials and peer - reviewed papers as summarized by Dr.Ames and approved the health claim which states that «eating barley helps to reduce cholesterol a risk factor for heart disease.&
Health Canada accepted the application after
reviewing the clinical trials and peer -
reviewed papers as summarized by Dr.Ames and approved the
health claim which states that «eating barley helps to reduce cholesterol a risk factor for heart disease.&
health claim which states that «eating barley helps to reduce cholesterol a risk factor for heart disease.»
Further,
reviews of the
health effects of grain lectins do not support the wild
claims found on the internet or sensational mass market «
health» books.
When the dead need to talk, Alex Craft is always ready to listen... As a Grave Witch, Alex solves murders by raising the dead The Scientific
Review of Mental
Health Practice Objective Investigations of Controversial and Unorthodox
Claims in Clinical Psychology, Psychiatry, and
Also, have your
health insurance company
review the
claim against your policy.
The FPLA contains additional regulations designed to prevent unfair or deceptive packaging and labeling, and to help make it possible for consumers to make value comparisons between products The FDA also
reviews specific
claims on pet food, such as «maintains urinary tract
health,» «low magnesium,» and «hairball control.»
Tags: Dr. Carol McConnell, medical record
review, Nationwide Insurance, pet
health insurance, pet insurance, pet insurance
claims, pet insurance underwriting, pet medical history, pre-existing conditions pet insurance, Scott Liles, Veterinary Pet Insurance, VPI
Put another way, this means the FDA has not
reviewed or verified the
health claims on any veterinary diet.
Minneapolis, MN About Blog HealthNewsReview.org systematically
review health news to help journalists and the public improve their critical thinking about
claims of
health care interventions.
On closer examination, very few products actually make a specific
health claim because, if so, the FDA would be asking to
review the evidence for the
claim.
Despite these
claims by the wind industry as of late 2012 there were over a dozen peer -
reviewed published papers linking wind turbine noise with
health impacts.
Similarly, did morale plunge at BP — and mental
health claims rise — after the Gulf of Mexico oil spill, or at Exxon Mobil after the company was regularly cited for funding organizations whose raison d'être was to discredit state - of - the - art, peer -
reviewed climate science?
This
claim for judicial
review was brought against the Secretary of State for
Health, acting by the Medicines and
Health Care Products Regulatory Agency (the MHRA).
This has been a key focus for the government in recent months, and also follows a recent Department of
Health consultation into fixed costs in medical negligence
claims up to # 25,000, as well as a
review by Lord Justice Jackson of caps for all civil litigation with a value up to # 250,000.
This webinar provided an introduction to the Stark law, the Anti-Kickback Statute, the False
Claims Act, and other
health care fraud and abuse laws;
reviewed common compliance issues that arise under these laws; and discussed the range of penalties for noncompliance with such laws.
Since joining FLR, Andrea has worked on numerous pleadings and memoranda involving motions to dismiss, to compel discovery, and for summary judgment on issues such as contracts (including personal services contracts), a wide variety of tort - based
claims, punitive damages, privilege and sovereign immunity, insurance coverage, family law, Florida Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act,
Health Care Quality Improvement Act immunity and peer
review, and estates and trusts.
Andrew has particular expertise in
claims for judicial
review and statutory appeals in the fields of human rights, local government law, education law,
health and community care law, environmental and planning law and regulatory law.
This includes both public law and private law
claims, and relates to, amongst other things: challenges by way of judicial
review to hospital closures and reconfigurations, availability of specific treatments and drugs, contractual and structural issues in the NHS (especially GPs and dentists), mental
health law, medical product liability, cases involving ethical questions such as consent to treatment, and cases relating to confidentiality and patient information.
The other examples provided by commenters, such as arranging, conducting, or assistance with primary and appellate level
review of enrollee coverage appeals, also fall within the scope of adjudication of
health benefits
claims.
Charles acts in judicial
review claims and advisory work both for and against public bodies in areas such as immigration, prisons, hospitals, mental
health and community care, and was on the Attorney General's A Panel for 5 years before taking silk.
Because employees of the plan sponsor often perform
health care operations and payment (e.g. plan administration) functions, such as
claims payment, quality
review, and auditing, they may have legitimate need for such information.
The «minimum necessary» policy in the final rule has essentially three components: first, it does not pertain to certain uses and disclosures including treatment - related exchange of information among
health care providers; second, for disclosures that are made on a routine basis, such as insurance
claims, a covered entity is required to have policies and procedures governing such exchanges (but the rule does not require a case - by - case determination in such cases); and third, providers must have a process for
reviewing non-routine requests on a case - by - case basis to assure that only the minimum necessary information is disclosed.
Main findings from the
review of caselaw on WSIB adjudication (see also Chart) point to the regular disregard of the treating
health professional's medical opinion about whether return to work is safe; the reversal of benefits promised to the most vulnerable injured workers (those with permanent disabilities approaching «lock - in» of benefits); wrongful denial of compensation based on «little or no evidence» of pre-existing conditions; and undue targeting of workers with psychological injuries for denial of
claims and for surveillance.
In community care he has fought judicial
review claims regarding residential care and funding, age assessment, and cases raising issues as to mental
health and capacity.
His particular expertise covers
health, safety and environmental (including nuisance, noise abatement, pollution, permit appeals and environmental warranty and civil
claims), judicial
review, corporate defence (including bribery and corruption, investigations and corporate manslaughter), inquest law, food hygiene and safety, transport law, including public inquiries in front of traffic commissioners, product safety, liability and recall, and he is a solicitor - advocate.
(A) A function or activity involving the use or disclosure of individually identifiable
health information, including
claims processing or administration, data analysis, processing or administration, utilization
review, quality assurance, billing, benefit management, practice management, and repricing; or