Mental
health courts seek to address underlying problems that contribute to criminal behavior by linking criminal offenders who have mental illnesses to needed services and treatment.
Not exact matches
Two reproductive -
health organizations have filed lawsuits in federal
court seeking to block the Trump administration from shifting family planning policy to stress abstinence and limit counseling for adolescents.
The official
court filing states that the claims on certain patents «
seek a monopoly on the abstract ideas of collecting and monitoring sleep and other
health - related data,» and are therefore ineligible.
Update (July 23): GuideStone Financial, The Little Sisters of the Poor, and other religious nonprofits are filing an appeal to the US Supreme
Court,
seeking relief from the Obamacare mandate to provide birth control through their
health insurance plans.
«[Wheaton College] has failed to show that delaying a judgment in its favor to the conclusion of proceedings in the district
court would do the college any harm... The college has also failed to match the relief it
seeks to the illegalities it alleges... the government isn't using the college's
health plans, as we have explained at perhaps excessive length.»
Aja Teehan vs HSE is a High
Court challenge against the HSE and the Department of
Health seeking judicial review of the refusal to grant her a home birth.
Aja Teehan vs HSE is a High
Court challenge against the HSE and the Department of
Health seeking judicial review of the refusal to grant... Read More
Aboki said: «In view of the letter sent to this panel from the applicant's counsel, Chief Kanu Agabi,
seeking adjournment on account of ill
health and since this prayer is not opposed, the
court will grant it.
Some of the grounds the Federal Government is
seeking the revocation of Kanu's bail are that; the offence for which he is standing trial is not ordinarily bailable; that among other conditions for the bail of the 1st defendant is that he should not be seen in a crowd exceeding 10 people; that he should not grant any interviews, hold or attend any rallies; that he should file in
court medical updates of his
health status every month; that rather than observing all of the conditions listed above, the 1st defendant in flagrant disobedience to the
court order flouted all conditions of the bail.
Former National Youth organizer of the Peoples National Convention, (PNC) Abu Ramadan is set to return to the Supreme
Court to
seek clarity on its May 5 ruling on the deletion of names of persons who used National
Health Insurance Cards as proof of identity in the voters» register.
UC announced yesterday that it is the first research institution to
seek to «intervene,» or become a party in the case, in which the government is appealing a lower
court's ruling that National Institutes of
Health (NIH) funding to study human embryonic stem cells (hESCs) violates federal law.
The
court had instructed the jury,» [I] f the medical, hospital, rehabilitation, or physical therapy expenses were paid by a third party such as a medical insurance company or a
health maintenance organization, that party can
seek reimbursement from any amount paid from any judgment you may award.»
Filed emergency application
seeking temporary restraints / injunction in NY Supreme
Court against one of the largest integrated
health systems in the U.S. concerning breach of contract claims asserted by voluntary benefits broker, which resulted in near immediate settlement of claims favorable to client.
These include the extent to which natural justice and procedural fairness must be respected in a multi-stage disciplinary process, and whether employment law principles apply to relationships between
health authorities and physicians — the right of a physician to
seek reinstatement by
court order when privileges are improperly terminated.
Her family
sought an injunction in the High
Court and also appealed her mental
health status to the Upper Tribunal.
(3) before making an adoption order the
court must be satisfied that there is no practical way of the authorities (including the
Health Service) providing the requisite assistance and support and Judges must explore rigorously whether a Local Authority is
seeking a Placement Order because resource issues make it unwilling to provide the necessary support.
The
Court concluded that the plaintiffs» privacy should be maintained because a denial of their anonymity in the action would result in disclosure of the very information they
seek to protect and thereby exacerbate the damage and / or risk of harm already caused by
Health Canada's November 2013 mailing.
A paramedical technician and her labour union, the
Health Sciences Association of Alberta (the «Union»),
sought a
court declaration that the College acted ultra vires its authority when it required paramedical technicians to complete the form.
Proper forum: Although the College argued that the technician had to
seek review from the
Health Disciplines Board under the HDA, the
court concluded that the
Health Disciplines Board had no authority over the College, and no jurisdiction to become involved in a registration dispute between the College and its members [83].
The B.C. Supreme
Court recently upheld the power of an inquiry committee under B.C.'s Health Professions Act to issue a non-disciplinary letter of direction (or expectation)-- one that a respondent could not seek review by a court — und
Court recently upheld the power of an inquiry committee under B.C.'s
Health Professions Act to issue a non-disciplinary letter of direction (or expectation)-- one that a respondent could not
seek review by a
court — und
court — under...
The HPRB as a party on judicial review: On judicial review, the registrant and the complainant were not in attendance, but the Review Board
sought to be heard on the
Court's role in a judicial review in cases under
Health Professions Act.
The B.C. Supreme
Court recently upheld the power of an inquiry committee under B.C.'s Health Professions Act to issue a non-disciplinary letter of direction (or expectation)-- one that a respondent could not seek review by a court — under HPA section 33 (6
Court recently upheld the power of an inquiry committee under B.C.'s
Health Professions Act to issue a non-disciplinary letter of direction (or expectation)-- one that a respondent could not
seek review by a
court — under HPA section 33 (6
court — under HPA section 33 (6)(b).
Comment: Some commenters argued that a rule that required a
court order for every instance that law enforcement
sought protected
health information would impose substantial financial and administrative burdens on federal and state law enforcement and
courts.
Covered entities may also disclose protected
health information in response to a subpoena, discovery request, or other lawful process without a
court order, but only if the covered entity receives satisfactory assurances that the party
seeking disclosure has made reasonable efforts to ensure that the individual has been notified of the request or that reasonable efforts have been made by the party
seeking the information to secure a qualified protective order.
Thus, in the final rule we provide that a covered entity may disclose protected
health information in response to a subpoena, discovery request or other lawful process that is not accompanied by a
court order if it receives satisfactory assurance from the party
seeking the request that the requesting party has made a good faith attempt to provide written notice to the individual that includes sufficient information about the litigation or proceeding to permit the individual to raise an objection to the
court or administrative tribunal and that the time for the individual to raise objections has elapsed (and that none were filed or all have been resolved).
In determining the amount and duration of maintenance the
court shall consider: (A) the income and property of the respective parties including marital property distributed pursuant to subdivision five of this part; (B) the duration of the marriage and the age and
health of both parties; (C) the present and future earning capacity of both parties; (D) the ability of the party
seeking maintenance to become self - supporting and, if applicable, the period of time and training necessary therefor; (E) reduced or lost lifetime earning capacity of the party
seeking maintenance as a result of having foregone or delayed education, training, employment, or career opportunities during the marriage; (F) the presence of children of the marriage in the respective homes of the parties; (G) the tax consequences to each party; (H) contributions and services of the party
seeking maintenance as a spouse, parent, wage earner and homemaker, and to the career or career potential of the other party; (I) the wasteful dissipation of marital property by either spouse; (J) any transfer or encumbrance made in contemplation of a matrimonial action without fair consideration; and (K) any other factor which the
court shall expressly find to be just and proper.
(B) The party
seeking the protected
health information has requested a qualified protective order from such
court or administrative tribunal.
Required by law includes, but is not limited to,
court orders and
court - ordered warrants; subpoenas or summons issued by a
court, grand jury, a governmental or tribal inspector general, or an administrative body authorized to require the production of information; a civil or an authorized investigative demand; Medicare conditions of participation with respect to
health care providers participating in the program; and statutes or regulations that require the production of information, including statutes or regulations that require such information if payment is
sought under a government program providing public benefits.
Similarly, in Canadian Doctors for Refugee Care v Canada (Attorney General), 2014 FC 651, the Federal
Court found that the government's cuts to Interim Federal
Health funding for refugee claimants and other persons
seeking protection from Canada amounted to cruel and unusual treatment under s. 12 of the Charter, and was not justified by s. 1.
In addition to a finding that parenting time would endanger the child's physical
health or significantly impair the child's emotional development, in any order imposing or continuing a parenting time restriction, the
court shall enumerate the specific factual findings supporting the restriction and may enumerate the conditions that the restricted party could fulfill in order to
seek modification in the parenting plan.
While a child has a right to privacy in
court, it appears that information on every aspect of his private life will soon be available to, and
sought by, all public authority and
health workers, as from next year they will have free access to the ContactPoint database.
According to the
Court, unnecessary
health regulations that have the purpose or effect of presenting a substantial obstacle to a woman
seeking an abortion impose an undue burden.
«If you find yourself working with an older solo or small firm lawyer, or up against one in
court who you think might be suffering from a mental
health issue, why not reach out and suggest tactfully that they
seek help from a bar counseling program.
In this case, the requester
sought access to ``... all records regarding two aboriginal children refusing chemotherapy at McMaster Children's Hospital and the resulting Ontario
court family division case between Hamilton
Health Sciences and Brant Child and Family Services including but not limited to records regarding the Nov. 14, 2014 decision and April 24, 2015 clarification.»
«Due to the particular demographics of the target population (described above), the most common concerns presented are related to aging... [T] he majority of calls have been from judges and
court staff
seeking advice about how best to approach a bench officer exhibiting signs of declining mental acuity due to age, depression, or other
health problems.»
If, at any time, you feel an individual is threatening your life,
health or well - being, you have the right to
seek a restraining order from the
court to keep him away from you.
In June, the United States Supreme
Court clearly ruled in Whole Woman's
Health v Hellerstedt that the same medically unnecessary restrictions in Texas created an undue burden, which violated the constitutional rights of a patient
seeking safe and legal abortion.
Tallahassee, FL — Today on behalf of four women's
health care centers and two individual physicians, the Center for Reproductive Rights and Planned Parenthood Federation of America asked a federal
court to strike down a new law that will endanger the
health and lives of young women
seeking abortions in Florida.
In the Collaborative Divorce process, the focus is on the future of the individuals and their children, without undue focus on the past, resulting in a process that keeps private information out of the
Court system,
seeks to preserve the mental
health of the children, and allows the parties to better control their own destinies through a respectful team approach.
This course is recommended for
health care professionals, especially addiction counselors, psychologists, mental
health counselors, social workers, and nurses who
seek knowledge about the workings of specialty
courts for people with co-occurring disorders.
An alienated parent must
seek professional advice (mental
health and legal) to determine if their case is suited to a
court - ordered resolution, and how to properly strategize the repair of the damaged parent - child relationship.
Professional Endorsement provides to peers, employers, referrals, consumers and
court services
seeking expert witnesses necessary information regarding a professional's education and skills related to the social and emotional development and mental
health of infants, young children and their families.
These restrictions
seek to address such issues as: · spouse abuse · child abuse · alcohol abuse and substance abuse · harmful exposure to the other parent's paramour or significant other · no smoking due to a child's asthma · mental
health counseling and medication compliance · anger management · parent skills education · safe child transfer or transition between parents · advance notice of relocation · proper use of an infant or child car seat · interference with visitation and appropriate make - up visitation Sometimes
courts find it necessary to order supervised visitation, including through
court - related supervised visitation programs.