New York State has already shown that it is prepared to prioritize human
health over fossil fuel extraction with its refusal in 2014 to permit high - volume fracking.
Not exact matches
A vast number of scientists, engineers, and visionary businessmen are boldly designing a future that is based on low - impact energy pathways and living within safe planetary boundaries; a future in which substantial
health gains can be achieved by eliminating
fossil -
fuel pollution; and a future in which we strive to hand
over a liveable planet to posterity.
Our mobility, our
health and lifestyles, our diet and its variety, our education system, particularly at the higher level, and our high culture would be quite impossible without
fossil fuels, which have provided
over 90 % of the energy consumed on the earth since 1800.
Considering that
fossil fuels played a major part in our economic success and improved
health and living standards
over the past century, such a plus factor would be enormous.
By contrast, despite spending
over $ 2 trillion in 5 decades, aid programs have much less to show in terms of poverty reduction — or its ancillary benefits, e.g., reductions in hunger, disease, better
health care and education, and greater adaptive capacity to deal with climate change and natural disasters — than does
fossil fuel - powered economic development.
Moreover, facing the problem squarely and honestly runs contrary to a shared value system — one that discounts the need for government regulation, favors industry growth and profit
over public
health and safety, and places a high priority on maximizing domestic
fossil fuel extraction.
A 2014 IMF report (covering
over 150 countries) provides estimates for taxes on
fossil fuel products to reflect pollution and other environmental impacts associated with energy use, while underscoring the large environmental,
health, and fiscal benefits from tax reform and the critical role of finance ministries in administration and ensuring efficient use of revenues.