Sentences with phrase «health requirements when»

Offers cheap premiums but will raise premiums, sometimes significantly, if you don't meet specific health requirements when it's time to renew.

Not exact matches

Under the FDA's Food Safety Modernization Act, the agency does have the authority to order the recall of certain food products when the FDA determines that there is a reasonable probability that the article of food is adulterated or in violation of certain allergen labeling requirements and that the use of or exposure to such article will cause serious adverse health consequences or death to humans or animals.

Nestlé has formed the Infant & Pediatric Nutrition Association of the Philippines with formula companies Abbott Laboratories, Fonterra Brands, Mead Johnson Nutrition and Wyeth to lobby against the existing marketing requirements — yet Nestlé and other companies cite anti-trust regulations when called on to mutually agree to stop violations of the international minimum standards adopted by the World Health Assembly.

Yet when Donald Trump nixed a rule that required exactly that — a requirement that mental health data be part of a national database to screen gun buyers — John Faso said absolutely nothing.

When you combine that massive hole with a good requirement: the requirement to cover any existing condition, you get... a lot of people not buying health insurance until they get sick.

Consumers across the country will start seeing these numbers on menu boards when labeling requirements roll out nationwide as part of the new health care reform law.

When the project began, most of the participants signed on in response to the National Institutes of Health (NIH) requirement that all training grant recipients receive training in the responsible conduct of research.

Zinc is essential for survival, and zinc deficiency has serious consequences for health, particularly during childhood when zinc requirements are increased.

When we don't nourish them with the specific nutritional requirements that make health possible, it can start with you feeling tired and lethargic.

I find no evidence that exceeding your daily minimum protein requirements is dangerous to your health, so when in doubt, err on the side of eating more, not less.

When you gather facts from more accurate resources, it is clear to see that eating a plant - based diet to meet our dietary requirements for protein is much better for the overall health of our citizens and the health of our planet.

This daily diet when checked on Cronometer.com meets all of the Vitamin / Mineral as well as Fat / Protein / Carb requirements for optimal health.

The DOT Order directs the Department to consider EJ objectives when administering the requirements of NEPA; Title VI and related statutes; the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970, as amended (URA); Congressional authorized planning requirements; other laws, regulations, and executive orders, that address or affect infrastructure planning and decisionmaking; social, economic or environmental matters; public health; and public involvement.

The DOT EJ Order directs the Department to consider EJ objectives when administering the requirements of NEPA; Title VI and related statutes; the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970, as amended; planning statutes in Title 23, U.S. Code and Title 49, U.S. Code; and other statutes, regulations, and Executive Orders that address or affect transportation infrastructure planning and decision - making; social, economic or environmental matters; public health; or public involvement.

Health insurance issuers will be required to disclose to the student when the policy being issued does not meet the minimum annual limits requirements.

When you meet the other health requirements, your lower non-smoker premiums will begin on your next premium due date.

The fact is, when it comes to purchasing travel health insurance (or using existing coverage through a credit card or work plan), the onus is largely on consumers to make sure they meet the requirements of policies.

Dogs with health issues have different requirements when it come to holding it in.

As always when it comes to the health of your dog, consult with your veterinarian about your particular dog's nutrition and exercise requirements, or before you make changes to them.

When prospective adopters contact Stephanie at Forgotten Felines for a cat, she impresses the requirements for food, shelter and health care.

Quality supplements are often recommended for dogs and cats and when added to pet food may help maintain optimal health and meet nutritional requirements.

This helps the food to meet minimum requirements as cheaply as possible but it leaves your dog open to potential health issues when he can't use these low quality proteins.

When opting to rescue, please research the prospective rescue organization thoroughly to make sure they are not for profit, stand by a strict spay / neuter requirement, and do not place dogs site unseen from another geography or without a full evaluation of temperament and health.

As explained above, the regulations provide exceptions to age, health, and vaccination requirements for dogs imported for veterinary treatment only when veterinary treatment for that dog can not be obtained in the country of export.

When a dog has meet all of the CHIC health testing requirements for their breed, they receive a CHIC number to indicate that they have met the minimum testing requirements as set forth by their breed club.

When it comes to working with a reputable breeder, what should you look for in terms of their contracts and health testing requirements?

Choosing the Best Dog Breeds For The Elderly When choosing the best dog breeds for the elderly, compare the potential senior owner's residence, health status and physical strength with the pet's physical traits, personality and routine care requirements.

You'll need to take grooming requirements, activity level, size and common health ailments in mind when choosing a good house dog for your family.

In terms of health considerations when looking to adopt a kitten, consider its worming, vaccination and desexing history or future requirements.

When choosing cat treats, consumers are looking for quality products, but also goods that will satisfy finicky felines and meet the specific dietary requirements to improve the health of these animals.

ILFI has drafted sample specifications for project teams to reference when including the Materials Petal and Health & Happiness Petal requirements in their Construction Documents.

The U.S. Supreme Court has emphatically reaffirmed the requirement that collective bargaining agreements must be interpreted according to «ordinary principles of contract law» when deciding whether retired employees are entitled to health care benefits, according to a post by Foster Swift Collins & Smith PC.

We hope that, after the repeal, the competent authorities such as the Ministry of Health, the National Health Insurance Fund, and other administrative / regulatory bodies will refrain from setting unreasonable and unjustified requirements for pharmacies when it comes to dispensing medicines that are subject to reimbursement.

The fundamental principles are famously (although not for the first time — see R v Brent London BC ex parte Gunning [1985] 84 LGR 168) set out by Lord Woolf MR (as he then was) in R v North and East Devon Health Authority, ex parte Coughlan [2001] QB 213, [2000] 3 All ER 850, at [108] as follows: whether or not consultation is a legal requirement, if it is embarked upon it must be carried out properly; to be proper, consultation must be undertaken at a time when proposals are still at a formative stage; it must include sufficient reasons for particular proposals to allow those consulted to give intelligent consideration and an intelligent response; adequate time must be given for this purpose; and the product of consultation must be conscientiously taken into account when the ultimate decision is taken.

b) Due to June 5, 2017 amendments, when it comes to compassionate care leave, critical illness of child leave and long - term illness and injury leave, the requirement that an employee provide to the employer a medical certificate «issued by a physician» was struck out because it recognizes that «other health professionals are providing services to Albertans, critical services, and in some areas of the province nurse practitioners and other health professionals as well.»

2012 was, however, a year when courts emphasized in various contexts the need for regulators to be increasingly sophisticated, by dealing with less obvious but nonetheless binding external requirements, such as Charter rights and human rights, as well as with «internal» procedural fairness rights, and a possible need for health regulators in BC, at least, to deal with single - instances of «negligent» conduct as an aspect of competence.

The requirement would not have applied to permissible uses or disclosures under proposed § 164.510, including uses and disclosures in emergency circumstances under proposed § 164.510 (k); when the health care services provided were emergency services; or to required disclosures to the Secretary under proposed § 164.522.

Even when a state has a law limiting disclosure of health information, the law typically exempts many types of disclosure from the authorization requirement.

This is likely to be the case when the federal entity or federally regulated or funded entity provides health services; the requirements of part C may apply to such an entity as a «health care provider.»

By contrast, the Privacy Rule describes the requirements that govern the circumstances under which protected health information must be used or disclosed with and without patient involvement and when a patient may have access to his or her protected health information.

The commenters identified particular factors that could lead to confusion, including that (1) the phrase «criminal, civil, or administrative proceeding» appeared in the definitions of both law enforcement Start Printed Page 82673and oversight; (2) the examples of oversight agencies listed in the preamble included a number of organizations that also conduct law enforcement activities; (3) the NPRM addressed the issue of disclosures to investigate health care fraud in the law enforcement section (§ 164.510 (f)(5)-RRB-, yet health care fraud investigations are central to the mission of some health care oversight agencies; (4) the NPRM established more stringent rules for disclosure of protected health information pursuant to an administrative subpoena issued for law enforcement than for disclosure pursuant to an oversight agency's administrative subpoena; and (5) the preamble, but not the NPRM regulation text, indicated that agencies conducting both oversight and law enforcement activities would be subject to the oversight requirements when conducting oversight activities.

The health care component must meet the requirements of this rule that apply to a particular type of covered entity when it is functioning as that entity; e.g., when a health care component is operating as a health care provider it must meet the requirements of this rule applicable to a health care provider.

Response: We modify the proposed requirement that the business associate must return or destroy all protected health information received from the covered entity when the business associate contract is terminated.

Even if there is no mandated requirement to restrict disclosures of health information, providers may agree to requests for restrictions of disclosures when a patient expresses particular sensitivity and concern for the disclosure of health information.

Additionally, the commenter asked whether the privacy notice would need to contain these uses and disclosures and recommended that a general statement that these federal agencies would disclose protected health information when required by law be considered sufficient to meet the privacy notice requirements.

We do not include this element in the core requirements because we understand there may be times when the individual does not want the covered entity maintaining the protected health information to know the purpose for the use or disclosure.

Response: Section 164.512 (a) below permits covered entities to disclose protected health information when such disclosures are required by other laws as long as they follow the requirements of those laws.

A covered entity is not in violation of the requirements of this rule when a member of its workforce or a business associate of the covered entity discloses protected health information to: (i) A health oversight agency or public health authority authorized by law to investigate or otherwise oversee the relevant conduct or conditions of the covered entity; (ii) an appropriate health care accreditation organization; or (iii) an attorney, for the purpose of determining his or her legal options with respect to whistleblowing.

Fourth, in § 160.203, several criteria relating to the statutory grounds for exception determinations have been further spelled out: (1) The words «related to the provision of or payment for health care» have been added to the exception for fraud and abuse; (2) the words «to the extent expressly authorized by statute or regulation» have been added to the exception for state regulation of health plans; (3) the words «of serving a compelling need related to public health, safety, or welfare, and, where a standard, requirement, or implementation specification under part 164 of this subchapter is at issue, where the Secretary determines that the intrusion into privacy is warranted when balanced against the need to be served» have been added to the general exception «for other purposes»; and (4) the statutory provision regarding controlled substances has been elaborated on as follows: «Has as its principal purpose the regulation of the manufacture, registration, distribution, dispensing, or other control of any controlled substance, as defined at 21 U.S.C. 802, or which is deemed a controlled substance by state law.»

Specifically, this overlap occurred because: (1) The NPRM preamble, but not the NPRM regulation text, indicated that agencies conducting both oversight and law enforcement activities would be subject to the oversight requirements when conducting oversight activities; and (2) the NPRM addressed some disclosures for investigations of health care fraud in the law enforcement paragraph (proposed § 164.510 (f)(5)(i)-RRB-, while health care fraud investigations are central to the purpose of health care oversight agencies (covered under proposed § 164.510 (c)-RRB-.