Sentences with phrase «healthy birth rate»

But, in practice, it requires a healthy birth rate.

Not exact matches

My healthy baby died because the midwife at the birth center did not pick up the falling heart rate and by the time I was blue - lighted to a hospital, it was too late to resuscitate my boy.

Anemia is uncommon in the breastfed baby due to the following reasons: 1) a healthy, full - term infant has ample iron stores at birth to last him at least for the first six months of life, 2) although the amount of iron in breastmilk is small, it is readily absorbed at a rate of 49 % compared to 4 % of the iron in formula.

For healthy nulliparous women with a low risk pregnancy, the risk of an adverse perinatal outcome seems to be higher for planned births at home, and the intrapartum transfer rate is high in all settings other than an obstetric unit

Lower intervention rates are an important aspect of healthy birth.

Can you crunch the Oregon homebirth death rate with the Everest climb attempt death rate (I think that it's 1/61 for younger climbers, 1/20 for older climbers but we are still talking about people who are otherwise totally fit and healthy, a bit like home birth mothers).

By the second week after birth, babies are generally back at or above birth weight and have begun a healthy rate of growth.

Breastfeeding is an unequalled way of providing ideal food for the healthy growth and development of infants1, providing protection from morbidity and mortality due to infectious diseases2 and chronic diseases later in life.3 Exclusive breastfeeding is recommended, starting within one hour of birth and for the first 6 months of life, with continued breastfeeding to 2 years of age and beyond.4 However, rates of initiation, exclusive breastfeeding and breastfeeding duration have fallen since the widespread introduction and promotion of breast - milk substitutes.5 Successful breastfeeding depends on a number of factors, including a re-normalisation of breastfeeding as the infant feeding method of choice through antenatal counselling and education and breastfeeding support to prevent and resolve breastfeeding difficulties.

Since 1984, the Surgeon General's office has issued serial publications8, 9 that have focused on increasing the rates of breastfeeding initiation and duration for both healthy and vulnerable populations, eg, low birth weight (LBW; < 2500 g) infants; and low income, minority, and employed women.

All sorts of hilarious errors — using one type of data (ICD10 code data from «white healthy women» and essentially comparing the best possible data from one set of hospital data related to low - risk births to the worst possible single set of data related to high - risk at - home births)-- if you use the writer's same data source for hospital births but include all comers in 2007 - 2010 (not just low - risk healthy white women), the infant death rate is actually 6.14 per 1000, which is «300 % higher death rate than at - home births!»

Add a birth doula to your support team and satisfaction rates soar, Cesarean and epidural rates plummet, babies and parents are even happier and healthier!

322 Additional subsequent large population case - control trials consistently have found vaccines to be protective against SIDS323, — , 325; however, confounding factors (social, maternal, birth, and infant medical history) might account for this protective effect.326 It also has been theorized that the decreased SIDS rate immediately after vaccination was attributable to infants being healthier at time of immunization, or «the healthy vaccinee effect.»

(Statistics bear out the 15 % Guideline in the arena of birth... the C - section rate in a healthy society is generally less than 12 %.

I could list several recent large prospective studies (this one out of Canada, this one out of the Netherlands, and this one out of the United Kingdom) all comparing where and with whom healthy women gave birth, which found similar rates of baby loss — around 2 per 1,000 — no matter the place or attendant.

But a study in two African countries found a slower rate of dilation for many women who went on to have healthy, vaginal births, researchers report online January 16 in PLOS Medicine.

The first major trial assessing the effect on fertility of lifestyle adjustment in obese women was published earlier this year and found that a weight - loss intervention preceding fertility treatment did not result in higher rates of healthy singleton birth within 24 months.

The analysis calculated rates of vaginal birth of a healthy singleton at term in natural and assisted reproduction conception comparing women in the intervention (lifestyle modification) group and those in the control (prompt treatment) group according to six different subgroups: these subgroups were defined by age (over or under 36 years), cycle regularity (ovulatory or anovulatory) and body weight (above or below a BMI of 35 kg / m2).

Results showed that the lifestyle intervention had no significant effect on healthy live birth rate and overall live birth rate in any of the six subgroups having fertility treatment.

It found that there was no statistically significant difference in the probability of a woman giving birth to a healthy baby (or twins)-- the cumulative delivery rate (CDR)-- after the legislation came in to force.

In a study presented today at the Society for Maternal - Fetal Medicine's (SMFM) annual meeting, The Pregnancy Meeting ™, researchers unveiled findings that suggest that induction of labor at 39 weeks of gestation among healthy, first - time mothers reduces the rate of cesarean birth as compared to expectant management among the same population.

What is NOT in dispute is healthy, live birth rates.

Not to mention an increase in the rate of C - sections, which means baby doesn't get the first inoculation of bacteria in the birth canal needed to build a healthy microbiome and immune system; a lack of breast feeding that colonizes a baby's gut flora; and unknown implications of so many vaccines in the first year of a baby's life.

This greatly reduces the birth rate, and it allows the cats to live out their lives in healthy, managed colonies.

The federal Healthy Start initiative, funded by the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) addresses racial and ethnic disparities in birth outcomes by supporting projects in communities that experience high infant mortality rates.

«Examples include the NC Healthy Start Foundation, which supports better birth outcomes and saves the state money through lower healthcare costs, and pre-k programs, which help narrow reading and math achievement gaps and increase the state's graduation rate.»

The point of comprehensive sexuality education is not to reduce teen birth rates; rather, she said, «it's so young people can have the resources and education they need to make healthy choices about their bodies and their lives.»

Domestic violence among the low income couples who would be targeted for the healthy marriage initiative is very rare.In fact, only 2 percent experience domestic violence.Critics of the healthy marriage initiative often cite statistics showing that a high percent of middle - aged welfare mothers have suffered domestic violence at some point in the past.These figures are irrelevant for two reasons.First, the healthy marriage initiative will focus on younger women around the time of a child's birth, not older mothers with a long history of welfare dependence.The domestic violence rates are very different for these two groups.Second, the fact a woman has experienced domestic violence in the past does not mean she is experiencing violence in a current relationship, or that most prior relationships have involved violence.

Using data collected to evaluate the Hawaii Healthy Start Program (same as Healthy Families America), the study estimated over two 3 - year intervals (during program implementation and over long - term follow - up) whether home visitation beginning after the birth of a child was associated with changes in (1) average rates of mothers» IPV victimization and perpetration and (2) rates of specific IPV types (physical assault, verbal abuse, sexual assault, and injury).