Sentences with phrase «hear about climate science»

Everything we hear about climate science is headed in the wrong direction.

given that 99 % of the criticisms we hear about climate science are bogus or based on deep confusions about what modeling is for

It's useful to think of this as an example of Bayesian priors in action — given that 99 % of the criticisms we hear about climate science are bogus or based on deep confusions about what modeling is for, scepticism is an appropriate first response, but because we are actually scientists, not shills, we are happy to correct real errors — sometimes they will matter, and sometimes they won't.

Not exact matches

WASHINGTON, D.C. — President - elect Donald Trump's choice to lead the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency expressed doubt about the science behind global climate change during a contentious Senate confirmation hearing on Wednesday, but added he would be obliged for now to uphold the EPA's finding carbon dioxide poses a public danger.

While the record was expected, the joint announcement by NASA and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration came in the midst of Senate confirmation hearings for President - elect Trump's cabinet nominees, several of whom have expressed doubts about established climate science, as has Trump himself.

Participants will have the opportunity to hear from leading experts from the University of Minnesota on their climate science research, engage with hands - on activities, and learn about how Climate Generation curriculum supports language arts, social studies, and science standards, including the Next Generation Science Staclimate science research, engage with hands - on activities, and learn about how Climate Generation curriculum supports language arts, social studies, and science standards, including the Next Generation Science Stascience research, engage with hands - on activities, and learn about how Climate Generation curriculum supports language arts, social studies, and science standards, including the Next Generation Science StaClimate Generation curriculum supports language arts, social studies, and science standards, including the Next Generation Science Stascience standards, including the Next Generation Science StaScience Standards.

And before I start hearing again about how stupid my questions are and how little I understand about climate science, this is in fact a concern expressed by many of the climate scientists I've been reading and listening to.

I am sure that people paid as environmentalist journalists don't necessarily like to hear such things, because of their pockets, but it is true that the climate science should be getting roughly 10 times less attention in the media than what it is getting now if the rules about the complexity and space in the media were consistently followed.

IMO when someone hears or reads something about climate science they should be careful about taking things at face value, consider that climate change science does have major regulatory / economic / environmental repercussions, realize that the source may be motivated by these potential repercussions, and look at the past behavior of the source (have they usually said accurate statements?).

A Dot Earth reader, J. Connors, reacted to my piece on the post-election prospect for hostile hearings on climate science by posting a spot - on comment about the real threat to such science in the new political climate:

We first heard about The Science Museum's new climate change gallery back in March this year when we read an exasperating report in The Times saying the museum was «revising the contents of its new climate science galScience Museum's new climate change gallery back in March this year when we read an exasperating report in The Times saying the museum was «revising the contents of its new climate science galscience gallery to

In this it shares a lot of characteristics with some of the engineering and social sciences for example (as an aside I get a wry smile when I hear people say climate science is unique because we only have one experiment, and think about the way social scientists leap on those rare longitudinal studies to help them understand things like learning and criminal behaviour).

When I hear someone say, What was the big deal about I lost trust in climate science because of Climategate, anyhow, I instantly assume that it's a believer in AGW

«I was invited about a year or so ago to New York to speak to the staff of the New York Attorney General's office mostly about the work we did in Merchants of Doubt... And I also participated a few weeks ago in a meeting in Boston with some colleagues from the Union of Concerned Scientists, which also involved the staff of attorneys general offices from a number of states who came to listen to again factual presentations about climate science, history of climate disinformation,» she told Rep. Paul Tonko, D - N.Y., at the hearing.

It is, to be legalistic about it, witness - tampering, and a sadly appropriate start to a hearing that at least partly addressed the climate of intimidation in global - warming science.

Sen. Frank R. Lautenberg, 1/23/24 — 6/3/13, R.I.P. I had the opportunity to answer questions from Senator Lautenberg about Bush administration political interference with climate science communication at a Senate hearing on Climate Change Research and Scientific Integrity iclimate science communication at a Senate hearing on Climate Change Research and Scientific Integrity iClimate Change Research and Scientific Integrity in 2007.

If you've been following climate science, you know what I mean: the sense that we're hurtling toward catastrophe but nobody wants to hear about it or do anything to avert it.»

My point is that you've been hearing about global warming, climate change, climate disruption (or whatever you prefer to call it) that «the science is settled» for years.

Talk to many of our Climate Reality Leaders and you'll hear a story about the moment climate science went from a dry subject in textbooks to the feeling of floodwaters soaking through jeans or the sight of wildfires leaping from house toClimate Reality Leaders and you'll hear a story about the moment climate science went from a dry subject in textbooks to the feeling of floodwaters soaking through jeans or the sight of wildfires leaping from house toclimate science went from a dry subject in textbooks to the feeling of floodwaters soaking through jeans or the sight of wildfires leaping from house to house.

From Curry's place: Mapleleaf «Dr. Curry, I'm sure that you agree (correct me if you don't) that the science behind the theory of anthropogenic induced climate change is a long one, and very well established (I can hear the cries of indignance from those in denial about AGW / ACC already), and borne out by multiple, independent data sets and consilience.

Of all the politicians in yesterday's hearing who are known climate change deniers, West Virginia Rep. David McKinley gets the tin foil hat award for his completely false assertions about climate change science.

The Forum for Climate Engineering Assessment drafted and organized the following letter regarding a November 8, 2017 U.S. House of Representatives Science, Space, and Technology Committee hearing about geoengineering research.

However, we keep hearing from them via the media, who provide them with a platform to sprout their disinformation, as if they have anything useful to say about climate science.

The Pope's gatekeepers and advisers can take much of the credit for making sure he did not hear about the actual climate science empirical evidence.

We never hear about this at Real Climate or Skeptical Science because they have no clue how it could have happened.

(Skeptical Science) When these politicians are asked about the basis for their positions on climate change, they almost always respond by saying such things as they «have heard that there is a disagreement among scientists» or similar responses that strongly suggest they have informed an opinion on climate change science without any understanding of the depth of the scientific evidence on which the scientific consensus view 0f climate change has beenScience) When these politicians are asked about the basis for their positions on climate change, they almost always respond by saying such things as they «have heard that there is a disagreement among scientists» or similar responses that strongly suggest they have informed an opinion on climate change science without any understanding of the depth of the scientific evidence on which the scientific consensus view 0f climate change has beenscience without any understanding of the depth of the scientific evidence on which the scientific consensus view 0f climate change has been based.

With a decision that could have far - reaching implications, a federal judge in California has ordered the first ever U.S. court hearing on climate science for a «public nuisance» lawsuit, meaning that major oil and gas companies for the first time may have to go on the record regarding what they knew about the planetary impacts of their products — and when.

When we hear «it's been cooling since 1998» for the umpteenth time, we want to look instead at the recent developments in climate science about oceans, available, for example, at Tenney's blog cited below, which actually refine what we know rather than going around the merry - go - round.

We often hear the claim that the science of climate change is settled, that there is general agreement that humans have been causing most of the recent warming trend, and that it will all end in global disaster unless we «do something about it».

At this public hearing, I will not only be sharing my ideas and urging the EPA to follow through on their plan, but will also be voicing the concerns of 1.8 million youth across America who have been educated about climate science and solutions by ACE.

Also on Capitol Hill during this «mother of all climate weeks»: the House Science and Technology Committee will also hold a hearing on Wednesday about measuring greenhouse gas emissions, while the Senate will hear from State Department climate change envoy Todd Stern on new global climate change agreements.

The only time I heard about it was on the NRDC site but only a paragraph in a summary of climate change science papers, but not really anywhere else.

A very, very small number of vocal climate scientists and a somewhat larger group of what I would call advocates and bureaucrats really determine what you hear in the media about AGW science.

Ahead of a Congressional hearing held by House Science Committee Chairman Lamar Smith (R - TX), members of Congress, law experts, and environmental groups gathered at the Capitol to highlight all that Exxon knew and buried about climate change, and to push back on the Chairman's overreaching subpoenas.

Ahead of a Congressional hearing held by House Science Committee Chairman Lamar Smith (R - TX), members of Congress, law experts, and environmental groups gathered at the Capitol to highlight all that Exxon knew and buried about climate change, and to push back on the Chairman's overreaching...