Sentences with phrase «hear each other speak»

I remember hearing others speak of his «sacrifice» in awed tones: «Just imagine!

How often we say when we meet a person about whom we have heard others speak: «You do not look in the least like the person I had expected to see.»)

In humans, the voice area is activated when we hear others speak, helping us recognize a speaker's identity and pick up on the emotional content in her voice.

It is so refreshing to hear others speak the anatomical truths.

I would think that it is better than meeting people when you both half toasted on alcohol and can't hear each other speak because of the loud music.

Thankyou for sharing, I too have moved family and home from a big city to a beach retreat and share my own story @ http://mybeachretreat.wordpress.com/ Its wonderful to hear others speak of their journeys, as none of them are easy and they make us be who we are as we search for what makes us happy in life.

Not exact matches

Watch the above video to hear Sculley speak about other adaptive innovators, including Alibaba founder Jack Ma.

Apparently, on occasion, Alexa can mistakenly hear the words, «Alexa, laugh» when other words are spoken near it.

When one person speaks, the other hears it in his or her own language.

The smartest people hear what others are saying and encourage them to speak what they are afraid to tell.

But I'm also hoping that it at least means my voice is being heard and maybe it encourages others to speak up.

Speaking at a hearing before the Senate Banking Committee, he said he does not see bitcoin and its competitors as a threat to financial stability, though he does have other concerns.

According to its website, over 140 languages and dialects can be heard in the city, with a third of its population speaking a language other than English or French at home.

It speaks directly to what your primary customer personas want to hear, answering their expectations for your product and service and differentiating your company clearly from others in your industry.

I don't hear any of these Christian candidates speaking out to solve that problem, or any other social problem either.

For on the one hand, without her he is not good — incapable of the wisdom that comes from speaking and hearing with an other who is a helper fit for him.

In my own case (and in no way am I saying that this is true for Julie or any other person who has been hushed up, tangled up or fucked up by an abusive system or a specific person), as I spoke my truth out loud to trusted friends and even a few strangers and unwitting passersby and heard their responses, I realized that I had formerly seen only part of the truth.

Others: Having been sexually abused by a man in our church myself at the age of 12, and having had to endure the consequences for the last 42 years, and having been the target of several righteous / religious attacks over the last few years, the abused have a right to speak and be heard even if it makes you uncomfortable.

Some scoff; others are willing to hear Paul speak again; a few convert.

But here difficulty again confronts the atheist or naturalist, for when he hears someone speak of God as the Beyond, he immediately conjures up in his mind an other - worldly Being, a Being beyond this world.

I never heard Richard speak of that skull or its terse motto, but he seemed more than others to live his life with its kind of awareness» and maybe, for that reason, as a happier man, with a more exquisitely lively sense of humor.

When you hear a Christian advocate personal purity, do you hear a judgment of yourself or others, or do you get angry because you don't want to live that way and then decide that the Christian's spoken point of view is a judgment?

In response, there was a later meeting with conservatives to hear, so to speak, the other side.

Since they had spent time with Jesus, following Him into Samaria (cf. John 4), and hearing Him speak positively about Samaritans (cf. Luke 10:29 - 37), they probably did not have the same aversion to Samaritans as did most other Jews.

It is refreshing in an age when Richard Rorty and his followers have told us that we can not speak this way to hear a philosopher doing so, but, at the same time, it is hard to know what to make of such talk in the light of Taylor's other claims.

Breathing helps me quiet the other voices so I can hear God speaking peace and assurance.

Speaking from the other side of the fence as a (former) seminary instructor, what you're saying is the exact same thing we hear from * every * student that didn't master one or both languages.

The others there heard a man speaking, but didn't see him.

I can't speak for other Christians, but I know that I have learned a valuable lesson about just repeating things you hear — even from respected preachers and teachers.

I'll add this thought: I think God's voice is more clearly heard when I stop speaking to others about their «sins».

These two are meant to be good for each other, the very crown of the goodness of creation, for they are the animal that has logos, capable of speaking and hearing, and therefore of teaching and learning the word of God.

The point at which communication frequently breaks down is not in the speaking or the listening, per se, but in failing to check frequently to see if one really hears and understands what the other means, feels, and intends.

The idea that in their sermons pastors have to speak to people in almost infantile terms about things that they can read in the daily newspaper is an insult to others who are there to hear something that they do not know.

Don't presume to speak for this man's father, Mr. Prothero... and be assured the Reverend IS about his father's business, which may sometimes include speaking difficult, politically incorrect truths that others may not enjoy hearing.

(1) Hallucinations — the person has issues with others whom he has / she has no business trying to change friends who (s) he insists are real, and to whom (s) he speaks daily, even though nobody can actually see or hear these friends.

Therefore they can also hear a word from God and speak to this divine other words of praise and thanksgiving, which give a voice to the goodness of creation.

I heard the other side of this at an academic conference recently where a book editor was speaking.

I, along with millions of others, am a devout Christian who heeds the words of Jesus when hearing of these self styled prophets and others who think that God speaks to them so that they can lead others.

In the same way also he would explain why I am saying this to you: he would speak of voice and hearing and air and a myriad other causes of that sort, and would altogether forget to mention the real cause, which is quite simply that, since the Athenians have thought it right to condemn me, I have thought it right and just to sit here and bow to their sentence.

He recalled how his fellow priests had in many cases become very casual, and how in Rome «I heard, among other clever and coarse anecdotes at mealtimes, members of the papal curia laugh and boast about how some said Mass and with reference to the bread and wine spoke these words: ««Panis es, panis manebis; vinum es, vinum manebis» — «Bread you are and bread you shall remain; wine you are, and wine you shall remain» — and with these words they elevated the host and the wine in the usual way.

Rather, the gift of tongues becomes a gift of speaking in other languages so that people from throughout the world could hear «the mighty works of God» (2:11) Even that miraculous event remains incomplete and misunderstood until it is interpreted by the apostolic preaching.

Sometimes because we fear being labeled as «feminist» if we speak up, other times because we simply do not see, hear or understand.

no, adolph hitler, i hear goebbels, spear, himmler, goering, kaltenbrunner, eichmann and a host of others speaking in these posts.Is this the legacy we have come to?

Second, and more crucially, that secular objection (as in the hippie saying I heard so often in my youth: «Don't lay your value trips on me, man») rests on the assumption that someone can authentically sexually donate himself to another without making a definitive commitment to the other person; that is, he can «hedge his bets,» so speak, without paying the consequences ¯ a foolish assumption given the rates of sexually transmitted diseases, the divorce rates, the numbers of children born out of wedlock, and so forth.

What about the other guy who says to the group he is speaking to whatever they want to hear?

however i will add that because the latin speaking world was controled by laws of language usage, i don; t know if you have ever studied latin but it has more laws then any other spoken tongue i have ever heard of.

Prior to going on an un educated rant you should do some research about the issue you speak about and not simply base your argument on things you have heard or read by others.

@Steve, «When the Holy Spirit grabs a hold of us, He wishes us to gather with other believers to hear the Word (God's promises) and to recieve His Supper (and the other things I spoke of).»

When the Holy Spirit grabs a hold of us, He wishes us to gather with other believers to hear the Word (God's promises) and to recieve His Supper (and the other things I spoke of).

But if we are missing out opportunities to hear from God or speak truth into other people's lives, then what's really the point of all this anyway?