Sentences with phrase «hear the evidence of»

But he said the jury will hear evidence of a police interview with his client in which officers elicited potentially damaging admissions — which, Gonzalez said, were factually inaccurate.

In the United States, the Louisiana state Supreme Court ruled last year that state law does not require a priest to notify authorities after hearing evidence of child abuse from a child making a confession.

Yvette Cooper's home affairs select committee has heard evidence of increased hate crime attacks since the Brexit vote

Counsel to the first accused, Mr Alayo Abayomi urged the court to proceed on hearing the evidence of fact since his client pleaded guilty.

Because you heard no evidence of a corrupt bargain that Joe Percoco agreed to make,» Percoco's lawyer, Barry Bohrer, told the jury last week.

His fate now rests with the state Democratic Party's 92 - member executive committee, which will meet on Thursday to hear evidence of the challenge and decide whether to throw out the primary results - an unlikely prospect, Democrats say, without precedent in South Carolina politics.

I saw and heard evidence of that during this trip.

This is still an adversarial process, where the third party arbitrator hears the evidence of both sides and renders a decision.

The judge had ruled the jury should not hear evidence of this incident at the trial.

Even without notice, under s. 727 (3), the court may still impose an increased penalty after hearing evidence of the prior criminal record:

We do that so they don't hear the evidence of the previous witness.

Justice Knazan heard evidence of all the reasons why a person may want to communicate on a hashtag discussion without focusing on a particular person.

Appellate Court rejected that finding based on the lower court refusing to hear evidence of father's physical abuse.

Not exact matches

«A leading expert on making decisions and influencing others presents a career's worth of evidence on why the views you don't want to consider are often the ones you need to hear most,» is Grant's quick description of this book, out March 20.

During his confirmation hearing Sessions defended the case, citing evidence of absentee - ballot tampering.

Rep. Carolyn Maloney (D - N.Y.) said at a hearing last month that she had found evidence of misconduct dating back to 2007.

«This case has already been dismissed with prejudice by the court that heard it, which ruled in Yelp's favor and also found the claims not to be supported by credible evidence,» Vince Sollitto, Yelp's vice president of communications said.

You may well hear people point out that there's no evidence that splitting the roles of CEO and chair is beneficial, in the sense of increasing long - term shareholder value (or in terms of any other outcomes, for that matter).

In the same hearing, Comey and National Security Agency Director Mike Rogers added their organizations to the list of many other American and international intelligence agencies over the past week that have said there's no evidence to back the president's wiretapping allegation against former President Barack Obama.

It's probably not going to be possible to have a jury of people that have never heard of the bands, that have never heard the music, but the real question is, even with that understanding, can they only focus on the evidence that's being presented by the parties at trial and only use that evidence and nothing from their own life experience outside of the courtroom to make that decision?

Committee members displayed visible outrage during the session, accusing Facebook of concealing the truth or at very least concealing evidence from it at a prior hearing that took place in Washington in February — when the company sent its UK head of policy, Simon Milner, and its head of global policy management, Monika Bickert, to field questions.

«I think, given the extraordinary evidence we've heard so far today, it is absolutely astonishing that Mark Zuckerberg is not prepared to submit himself to questioning in front of a parliamentary or congressional hearing, given these are questions of fundamental importance and concern to his users, as well as to this inquiry,» Damian Collins, the member of parliament heading the UK committee, said earlier on Tuesday.

But people hear buybacks and think of Cisco in the 90s and other easily available examples as evidence of their inefficiency.

It has also said it's keen to press him on some of his previous answers, as a result of evidence it has heard since — including detailed testimony from CA whistleblower Chris Wylie late last month.

We expect that to happen again — particularly because the jury was prohibited from knowing about these court rulings in favor of Gawker, prohibited from seeing critical evidence gathered by the FBI and prohibited from hearing from the most important witness, Bubba Clem.

That aligns with anecdotal evidence gathered by Association staff members, who often have heard ESOP executives speak of involving employee owners in understanding the business and in managing expenses.

Delegates heard from Tracey Forrest, director at WISE, that advancements in energy recovery through rigorous evidence - based science are critical if the full potential of waste as a resource in a sustainable energy future is to be realised.

All of these «facts» completely lack any shred of real evidence beyond propagandistic U.S. hear - say reports.

Included in the hearings» evidence is an exasperated e-mail sent by Treasury Secretary Hank Paulson's chief of staff, Jim Wilkinson, on Sept. 9, 2008: «I just can't stomach us bailing out lehman.

Internet sales accounted for less than 3 percent of total sales, though the association has heard anecdotal evidence that such purchases are increasing.

On the word of the Seattle Times» without evidence, without witnesses, without a hearing» Brock Adams has been driven from public life, his reputation demolished, he and his life work made infamous.

I most commonly hear the thought that atheists are angry at God, had unanswered prayers, lost their way, need a support structure for their faith, etc. but I never hear anyone address the root of the cause for most atheists: there is no empirical, indisputable evidence for any god — and that matters.

So, in the absence of testimony, evidence, hearings, and similar niceties, the Seattle Times really had no choice but to go ahead and destroy Brock Adams on its own.

Many years ago, I heard someone speaking about how Jesus» life and death absorbed the «shock» of sin and death within creation and how we as His body have been called to a similar mission — the verses which speak of us «carrying in our selves» the marks that we belong to Him, sharing in some small way in His sufferings as we share in His life — it's all part of a realm where the sweet savor of the fragrance of Him is allowed to be evidenced in this broken world.

It's always funny hearing atheists continue to whine that there is no evidence of God or how in order to believe, they MUST get it or else.

He was giving evidence at the Scottish Child Abuse Inquiry which began the second phase of its hearings in Edinburgh on Tuesday.

Yes I know this will happen because I have been through these arguments time and time again and when I pull out my Bible that people claim to have read and match it to the scientific evidence that points very clearly to the validity and truth of the Bible they shut up and don't want to hear it.

ABSOLUTELY NO historical evidence such a person existed, even and especially among contemporary spiritual writers who you'd think would have at least heard of the rabble - rousing Nazarene.

The beauty of freedom of speech is that everyone can have their voices heard, no matter how idiotic it might be, as evidenced by your own post.

There is no evidence of a God and many of us have seen belief in God sometimes lead to bad things — probably because people assign power to God and then speak on his behalf (they «hear» what he says).

Since no one has ever been able to produce such evidence of any of the thousands of gods, I would like to hear what you have.

So basically, you heard a story you liked and decided to believe that story, regardless of the fact that no evidence actually supports that story.

Usually when I have talked with or heard some things from Calvinist regarding some of the «scriptural evidence» I think... really... never ever heard it translated / described that way.

I keep hearing about mountains of supporting evidence on file somewhere.

Amid all the noise that permeates our homes, giving evidence to the presence of life therein, the beautiful noise we should most long to hear, regardless of our age, is the sound of families singing the gospel together.

Have you not heard that absence of evidence is not evidence of absensce.

That order was contested at a hearing on May 13, 2014 [court transcripts available], and that restraining was dismissed and vacated for lacking evidence and not meeting the legal burden of proof [Hennepin County Case # 27 - CO-13-8209, filed May 16, 2014].

As a Christian, I have never heard of scientific evidence for the resurrection.

Racial discrimination can never be wholly acceptable to a people who have heard from their youth that God has «made of one blood all nations of men for to dwell on all the face of the earth...» (Acts 17:26) There is no evidence or even likelihood that this testimony would have been preserved apart from the action of the organized body of believers.

We have all heard of the big bang which has no evidence living cells could come from that.