Sentences with phrase «hear witnesses in the case»

Not exact matches

Murder defendant O.J. Simpson consults with friend Robert Kardashian and Alvin Michelson, the attorney representing Kardashian, during a hearing about Kardashian taking the witness stand in the O.J. Simpson murder case 03 May in Los Angeles.
BRASILIA (Reuters)- Brazil's top electoral court on Tuesday decided to hear new witnesses in an illegal campaign financing case that could remove President Michel Temer from office, delaying any verdict in the trial until at least May.
The witness, who was supposed to testify in a hearing before the sentencing in Terry's federal case, may be called the same day to testify in the ongoing trial of former Nassau County Executive Edward Mangano.
At the resumed hearing of the case, counsel to the Federal Government, Mr Rotimi Jacobs, SAN had told the Judge that the case was slated for commencement of trial and that he was fully ready with his witnesses that will testify in the case.
In his witness statement to a tribunal hearing, Mark Arthur, a British - Ghanaian who lost his job as result of the money laundering case, claimed that the Otumfuo invited him to his multimillion - pound sterling residence in Henley - on - Thames and handed him a bag containing almost # 200,000 as well as $ 200,000 with consecutive serial numberIn his witness statement to a tribunal hearing, Mark Arthur, a British - Ghanaian who lost his job as result of the money laundering case, claimed that the Otumfuo invited him to his multimillion - pound sterling residence in Henley - on - Thames and handed him a bag containing almost # 200,000 as well as $ 200,000 with consecutive serial numberin Henley - on - Thames and handed him a bag containing almost # 200,000 as well as $ 200,000 with consecutive serial numbers.
At a scheduled pre-trial hearing in the case on May 24, 2013, Chief Assistant District Attorney David Rossi told Carter he would not call witnesses because prosecutors did not plan to prosecute.
On October 26 when the case was supposed to be heard, prosecution filed four fresh charges and also asked for a secret trial to protect witnesses even though all the names of witnesses had been mentioned in the court processes.
At the resumed hearing of the case on Tuesday, the prosecutor, Mr Rotimi Oyedepo, concluded his examination in chief for the first prosecution witness Idowu Olusegun is a media consultant, under the name and style of Paste Posters Company Ltd..
At the resumed hearing of the case on Wednesday, the EFCC prosecutor, Mr Rotimi Oyedepo, sought the court's permission to continue with the examination - in - chief of the first prosecution witness.
He set up the hearing in a way that either side in the case may call expert witnesses if they wish.
As a licensed doctoral psychologist and authority on the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) and related federal disability laws, Howie has been an expert witness — testifying on behalf of parents, school districts, and state education departments — in many federal or state court cases, and innumerable due process hearings.
Regarding whether those ignorant in statistics can understand Hansen's latest papers, I'm a perfect test case: My knowledge of stats is low (if I had ever heard the term «sigma» before, I don't recall it), and only have a basic humanities major's ability to grasp scientific arguments (well, maybe a little better since I work with scientists as expert witnesses).
In contrast, a contested case hearing is the equivalent of a bench trial — briefing, witnesses, oral argument, etc..
Below Lawyer Monthly hears from Paul Rex at GBRW Expert Witness Limited, on the issues involved in filling the expert witness role in bankingWitness Limited, on the issues involved in filling the expert witness role in bankingwitness role in banking cases.
So, to keep my running list current, courts are not at all interested in hearing your clever rhetoric; your emotional exaggerations of how good, bad or ugly the other side's case is; or your disrespectful or uncivil language directed toward the court, opposing counsel, parties, witnesses or anyone else.
At this point, it is worth pointing out that: a) such a decision is considered to be «final» in Poland after six months (i.e. Mr Kussowski can not be investigated again for the same facts in Poland) unless new «essential evidence» against the suspect is uncovered (§ 12 - 13); b) the Polish authorities — apparently without requiring specific assistance in that regard — based their decision to drop the case, inter alia, on the fact that it had not been possible to hear witnesses residing in Gemany, including the victim.
In addition to providing an overview of new accident benefits arbitration process under the License Appeal Tribunal (LAT), which came into effect on April 1, 2016, Michelle will share valuable anecdotal discussion of what counsel have experienced so far on both sides, such as evidentiary and production issues at the case conference stage and before a hearing, what evidence adjudicators are looking for or emphasizing, the format of the hearing (written, oral, hybrid), witness issues, etc..
Notably, he has acted in a four - day unfair dismissal hearing where he cross-examined partners of an international law firm and witnesses abroad via video - link and has also acted as representation in an eight - day race discrimination case, obtaining a very favourable outcome for his client.
Archer was a case of alibi, the sort of case in which the accused probably has the very most to gain by hearing the other defence witnesses and then tailoring his evidence to fit in with theirs.
I have prepared numerous expert witness reports, and have served as the expert witness and / or corporate representative in depositions, hearings, and trials, in state and federal jurisdictions throughout the United States for product liability cases.
30 Although defence counsel may well run the risk of having evidence of an accused viewed as tainted when testifying after hearing other defence witnesses testify, I do not in this case find that Mr. Pasloski's evidence should be so characterized.
An oral hearing, depending on the procedures followed, can help your case in that (1) the questions asked at a hearing will often bring out evidence that was overlooked in written submissions, and (2) the decision - makers are better able to assess the credibility of witnesses in person.
A Law Society of Upper Canada hearing panel heard a colourful case yesterday in which a lawyer facing a misconduct hearing accused the LSUC's counsel of trying to bribe a witness.
A typical case: facts are in dispute, records are inconclusive or records do not exist and everything depends on the word of witnesses who will not even be heard until trial.
The Arizona Court of Appeals did accept jurisdiction, however, to clarify that some of the procedures followed by the court, in this case, were contrary to the statutes in place for the purpose of preventing any court in the future from delegating judicial decisions to expert witnesses or allowing interim transfers of custody without a hearing.
You have noted contacting several people who are potential witnesses in the case and who will be called as witnesses later on in an evidentiary hearing.
Prior to the case conference, the parties will be required to file a case conference summary outlining the documents to be used at the hearing, any production issues, the preference of type of hearing (written, electronic or in - person), a list of witnesses (including an explanation as to why more than two expert witnesses are required, if applicable) and the details of the most recent settlement offers.
Employee's attorney (Elliott Dennis) ably represented (his client) against a competent adversary in a medically complex and difficult case with many medical and lay witnesses... His case preparation, briefing and hearing presentations were exceptionally helpful to the panel in deciding the case.
«Imagine a court hearing where a witness enters the courtroom and one of the litigants in the case approaches the witness and says «This doesn't affect your testimony at all, but here's $ 800,000 for you if this case happens to go my way.»
We assist clients involved in Canadian anti-dumping proceedings in responding to all aspects of the case, including completion of questionnaire / RFI responses, assisting with normal value and export price calculations, attendance at SIMA verifications by Canada Border Services Agency officials, drafting of submissions, preparation of witness statements, and representation of clients at hearings before Canadian International Trade Tribunal.
«Justices to Hear Case Testing Rule on Witness»: Linda Greenhouse has this article today in The New York Times.
The main exceptions to this general rule is that arrest warrants may issue in a civil case (i) to compel the attendance of a witness who fails to make a timely response or appearance to a subpoena after being personally served in a timely manner with that subpoena, (ii) to compel someone to attend a quasi-criminal contempt of court hearing, and (iii) to arrest someone who have been held in contempt of court.
It may comprise: advice on complying with pre-action protocols; exploring the different avenues available for alternative dispute resolution (ADR); providing clients with a glossary of terms they will be come across in the court process; instruction sheets in plain English to explain aspects of procedure and the essential law to be applied (translated to be available in Welsh or foreign languages); how to provide disclosure; preparing court documents such as witness statements, case and costs summaries, chronologies and skeleton arguments; complying with the Rules in relation to service of documents, the preparation of statements of case, the appointment and instruction of expert witnesses; the importance of CPR Pt 36; or how to prepare for and what to expect at a financial dispute resolution (FDR) or a final hearing / trial.
And, it was undisputed, in each message the firm's GC was asked for advice on «the firm's ethical obligations» — principally, how the firm should respond to a notice from opposing counsel in the employment case that it intended to call one of the firm's attorneys as a fact witness at a forthcoming arbitration hearing.
Blouin, a provincial court judge in Toronto, cut the case short and acquitted the accused after hearing from the Crown's only witness, but before the defence was able to call its evidence, and before either side could make closing submissions.
While the case did not relate, actually, to enforcement of a judgment — but rather related to the issue of the compellability of a witness to give evidence against his own interests in a contempt hearing — the Court, in obiter, did make the following comment:
Pursuant to Swiss case law, the hearing of witnesses in the context of administrative proceedings is thus subsidiary to other investigative measures.
Here, Jack Lancer, an expert witness in ear, nose and throat surgery, talks to Lawyer Monthly about noise - induced hearing loss, the process of performing his medico - legal duties surrounding this condition, and the challenges he encounters in bringing these cases to a successful conclusion.
Conservative and Liberal members of the committee want a 5 - year extension of the provisions of the Act that allow preventive arrests and investigative hearings for material witnesses in terror cases.
Whether or not a delay in the substantive hearing resulted from unavailability of a tribunal or witnesses, time for negotiation, or the need for procedural hearings it was not satisfactory that such delay should require the applicant to revise and renew the case for eligibility under the livelihood condition or lose such eligibility.
By day six, a first appointment will be held in the FPC where standard directions will be made (including position statements and initial witness statements from each party and further CAFCASS analysis) and cases suitable for «early final hearings» identified.
«that, in case oath should be made that any witness, who had been examined by the coroner and was then absent, was detained by the means or procurement of the prisoner, and the opinion of the judges asked whether such examination might be read, we should answer, that, if their lordships were satisfied by the evidence they had heard that the witness was detained by means or procurement of the prisoner, then the examination might be read; but whether he was detained by means or procurement of the prisoner was matter of fact, of which we were not the judges, but their lordships.»
Providing evidence as a government witness in criminal cases before Grand Juries and at administrative hearings
• Knowledge of general clerical tasks including case file management, correspondence handling and notice issuing • Capable of operating court specific data entry software effectively • Familiar with mandatory reporting protocols of various actions like DWI and domestic violence cases • Skilled in obtaining history of convicts and witnesses to complete case file for the court hearing • Trained in processing and organizing legal documents prior to trials
Testified in court hearings and other formal proceedings and acted as a witness on cases that were civilly litigated.
At the revocation hearing, you should call witnesses and submit evidence that support your case that it is not in the best interests of your child for your ex to have custodial rights.
This gives the spouses much more latitude than they would have in court where the judge must apply the law to the facts of the case as he or she determines those facts after hearing the testimony of both spouses and all other witnesses and reviewing all relevant financial and child - related documents.)
When you set the case for hearing, you must notify the other party in writing of the date and time within two business days of obtaining the setting Prior to the final hearing, you should conduct discovery to obtain information about the other party's assets, arrange for witnesses to appear and prepare a final decree of divorce.
Mary Yarmirr was one of the main Indigenous witnesses in the hearing of the Croker Island case.
(b) A person shall automatically be disqualified as a member of a tribunal in any case in which the person is (1) related by blood or marriage to either complainant or respondent; (2) an employer, partner, employee, or in any way associated in business with either complainant or respondent; (3) a party to the hearing, or a party or a witness in any other pending case involving a party to this hearing; or (4) is objected to by a party as provided in Part Seven, Section 27 (f).
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z