Sentences with phrase «heard in open court»

All divorce petitions were still heard in open court, with the petitioner expected to give oral evidence to prove the adultery, cruelty or other facts alleged.

Though family proceedings are usually heard in private, there is the possibility that your case will be heard in open court, and the parties are able to speak to the press provided they do not breach certain reporting restrictions.

Just when most magistrates» legal advisers had cracked the question of what type of proceedings are child support proceedings in their court (they are not «family proceedings» because they are not listed in MCA 1980 s 65 (1) among those statutes which do give rise to «family proceedings»); just when the more alert had resolved that they are therefore civil proceedings, heard in open court and by the procedure set out in MCA 1980, s 53 and under the appropriate non-family procedural rules; along comes s 111A (5).

The decisions of Justice of the Peace Faulkner in 1980, and Justice of the Peace Deacon in 1989, were the catalysts that led to all bail hearings — no matter what the day — being heard in an open court.

The judge said the decision about whether to hold a judicial review should be heard in open court, after privately considering the merits of the application.

Details, mostly he said - she said stuff, remain sketchy since the case has yet to be heard in open court under oath.

He holds almost all of his hearings in open court and considers this the norm.

He held: «Principles of transparent and open justice require a court sitting in public itself first to determine by a hearing in open court the extent of the criminal conduct on which the offender has entered the plea and then, on the basis of its determination as to the conduct, the appropriate sentence... those who commit such serious crimes as corruption of senior government officials must not be viewed or treated in any different way to other criminals.»

Not exact matches

The two sides were set to face off in court on Tuesday, but late on Monday a federal judge in Riverside, California, agreed to the government's request to postpone the hearing after U.S. prosecutors said that a «third party» had presented a possible method for opening an encrypted iPhone.

Following pledges at Capitol Hill hearings and in advertisements that it would rebuild customer trust, the San Francisco - based lender moved to avoid facing many claims in open court.

«Given the important public policy issues at stake, we have also asked the court to hold its hearing in open rather than behind closed doors.

Nikolas Cruz appears in open court for the first time on Monday, Feb. 19, 2018, during a status hearing before Broward Circuit Judge Elizabeth Scherer.

Public labor members rallied Monday in Albany as the Supreme Court heard the opening arguments of Janus v. AFSCME, a case that challenges automatic union dues paid by public - sector workers.

Freeman says the law and court rulings specifically require government meetings to be in the presence of each other in an open setting so the public can not just hear them, but see them and see who may be «whispering in their ear.»

An unfathomable album which will be heard in the squash courts and open mic nights of deepest hell.

Some who trouble to read the opinions in this case will find it ironic — perhaps even bizarre — that on the very day we heard arguments in this case, the Court's session opened with an invocation for Divine protection.

An appellate court in Austin on Thursday, September 24, heard arguments from three open - enrollment charter schools on the constitutionality of Texas Education Code Section 12.115 (c - 1), an automatic revocation provision in Senate Bill 2 passed by the Legislature in 2013.

In another Albany chamber that same morning, a court prepared to hear the opening argument in a long - running education finance case, Maisto v. New York, that contends students from poorer communities are getting much less in per pupil spending — several thousands less — than their wealthier peerIn another Albany chamber that same morning, a court prepared to hear the opening argument in a long - running education finance case, Maisto v. New York, that contends students from poorer communities are getting much less in per pupil spending — several thousands less — than their wealthier peerin a long - running education finance case, Maisto v. New York, that contends students from poorer communities are getting much less in per pupil spending — several thousands less — than their wealthier peerin per pupil spending — several thousands less — than their wealthier peers.

The ruling from the appeals court and then confirmed by the State Supreme Court refusing to hear the appeal, meant there was never a «right» for the charter schools to open any kind of facility in another school district in the same cocourt and then confirmed by the State Supreme Court refusing to hear the appeal, meant there was never a «right» for the charter schools to open any kind of facility in another school district in the same coCourt refusing to hear the appeal, meant there was never a «right» for the charter schools to open any kind of facility in another school district in the same county.

Canada Police officer dies after shooting in Abbotsford, B.C., Canadian Press Cut down on court delays by supporting victims of crime: ombudsman, Canadian Press Inquiry into missing, murdered Indigenous women opens hearings in Edmonton, Canadian Press

Colonel George Taylor Denison took that honour when the first cases were heard Women's Court opened its doors in 1913.

All hearings are not open to the public and informal, which are quite different from litigation in the District Court.

As Charles Nesson eloquently puts it, tweeting and live - blogging can «facilitate [the] coveted ideal [of the open court principle] and allow the whispers, now made in the inner rooms of our public courthouses, to be proclaimed from the digital roof tops for all to hear.»

Accused of altering financial statements to ensure lucrative bonuses, they only stepped in court to hear opening statements in their trial on Monday.

In Smuk, McFarlane J.A. stated at paragraph three: When a witness, whether an accused or not, sits in court and hears the testimony of another witness on a subject matter as to which he later testifies, his evidence is open to the suggestion that it may have been made deliberately to conforIn Smuk, McFarlane J.A. stated at paragraph three: When a witness, whether an accused or not, sits in court and hears the testimony of another witness on a subject matter as to which he later testifies, his evidence is open to the suggestion that it may have been made deliberately to conforin court and hears the testimony of another witness on a subject matter as to which he later testifies, his evidence is open to the suggestion that it may have been made deliberately to conform.

When a witness sits in a Court and hears the testimony of another witness or other witnesses on a subject - matter as to which he later testifies, his evidence is open to the suggestion that it may have been made deliberately to conform, but that is a factor to be considered by the tribunal of fact and relates to the weight of the evidence.

«Supreme Court to hear case on separating church and state; Justices will consider whether to let city councils open their meetings with explicitly Christian prayers»: David G. Savage has this article today in The Los Angeles Times.

Justice Antonin Scalia opened the Supreme Court's new term Tuesday by questioning whether a man deported to Mexico after a drug conviction would be «abstaining from tequila» for fear of violating his U.S. parole terms.The remark came as justices heard an immigration case involving a Texas man, Reymundo Toledo - Flores, who was deported in April after being convicted of illegally entering the United States.

Whilst it was correct that there was no such evidence before the Commercial Court, in fact criminal proceedings had been opened in Ukraine by the time of the hearing, and shortly afterwards Khrapunov was put on an international wanted list and an Interpol red notice was issued for his arrest.

This experience of the good prospects for release was once confirmed by a Justice of the Peace in open court at a bail hearing Mr. Clark conducted.

In fact, Mother did not request to make either an opening or closing statement at the hearing and as the court is not required to allow her to do so, there was no error.

The appeals court found that the two statements were proper because, in the first instance, it rebutted the defense's opening statement that the jury would hear both sides and, in the second instance, it countered defense counsel's closing argument that «the evidence of innocence is compelling.»

And, interestingly, we never hear complaints or concerns about unelected federal prosecutors making policy judgments at sentencing (even though prosecutorial policy judgments are not made in open court nor subject to any kind of review).

Some of my cases going to a judgment in the last few years were: Click to open judgment in fresh window (Scottish Courts site) Insurance implications of playing «Happy Birthday» on the piano Damages for psychiatric illness caused by bereavement Judicial approval of the Hohfeldian analysis of rights Leading case on fair rent assessment Title raiders and retrospective rectification Leading case on competency of hearsay evidence Detention ordered by children's hearing: Articles 5 and 6 of ECHR No damage suffered by making a smaller profit than expected «In a well - regulated legal universe black holes should not exist» How much is half a home worth, with or without a mortgage «Reasonably obtained» held not to include unethically obtained Leading case on children's hearing system and ECHR Attempt to judicially review SNP; petitioners held not to exist Unlawful for council to charge for property enquiries Fair sharing (100 % to nil) of matrimonial properin the last few years were: Click to open judgment in fresh window (Scottish Courts site) Insurance implications of playing «Happy Birthday» on the piano Damages for psychiatric illness caused by bereavement Judicial approval of the Hohfeldian analysis of rights Leading case on fair rent assessment Title raiders and retrospective rectification Leading case on competency of hearsay evidence Detention ordered by children's hearing: Articles 5 and 6 of ECHR No damage suffered by making a smaller profit than expected «In a well - regulated legal universe black holes should not exist» How much is half a home worth, with or without a mortgage «Reasonably obtained» held not to include unethically obtained Leading case on children's hearing system and ECHR Attempt to judicially review SNP; petitioners held not to exist Unlawful for council to charge for property enquiries Fair sharing (100 % to nil) of matrimonial properin fresh window (Scottish Courts site) Insurance implications of playing «Happy Birthday» on the piano Damages for psychiatric illness caused by bereavement Judicial approval of the Hohfeldian analysis of rights Leading case on fair rent assessment Title raiders and retrospective rectification Leading case on competency of hearsay evidence Detention ordered by children's hearing: Articles 5 and 6 of ECHR No damage suffered by making a smaller profit than expected «In a well - regulated legal universe black holes should not exist» How much is half a home worth, with or without a mortgage «Reasonably obtained» held not to include unethically obtained Leading case on children's hearing system and ECHR Attempt to judicially review SNP; petitioners held not to exist Unlawful for council to charge for property enquiries Fair sharing (100 % to nil) of matrimonial properIn a well - regulated legal universe black holes should not exist» How much is half a home worth, with or without a mortgage «Reasonably obtained» held not to include unethically obtained Leading case on children's hearing system and ECHR Attempt to judicially review SNP; petitioners held not to exist Unlawful for council to charge for property enquiries Fair sharing (100 % to nil) of matrimonial property

In a unanimous decision, the court ruled that while there is «continuing confusion» among courts in Kentucky, criminal contempt hearings for jurors should be open to the publiIn a unanimous decision, the court ruled that while there is «continuing confusion» among courts in Kentucky, criminal contempt hearings for jurors should be open to the publiin Kentucky, criminal contempt hearings for jurors should be open to the public.

Courts are supposed to be open to the public — that includes bail hearings, trials and appeals, as well as records filed in cases.

Had the Supreme Court found in favour of Mrs Baker, the floodgates for tens of thousands of noise induced hearing loss claims would have opened.

Another key issue in the case was the open - court principle as the Ontario government argued it precludes an Ontario judge from conducting a hearing outside the province.

I hear from those in large law libraries that are somewhat open to the public, such as academic law libraries, that they get a number of pro se litigants — i.e. people who intend on representing themselves in court — trying to do legal research.

«I would conclude that the Ontario supervising judge while physically located outside the province has the jurisdiction and discretion to conduct the motion remotely and concurrently with his or her judicial supervisory counterparts,» wrote Juriansz, who emphasized the necessity of ensuring the open - courts principle but found technological alternatives could accommodate the requirement that the Ontario public be able to attend the hearing in an Ontario courtroom.

Counsel then argued whether this proposed disclosure should be more expansive in order to comply with the open court principle and they largely agreed on the extent to which the hearing should be held in camera.

The judge plays a critical role in family court and how open they are to hearing from someone who has generally not been involved in the case up to the point of their testimony.

In open court, anyone can hear what is going on with you and your family.

An oral presentation will be made by the evaluator in open court at a Settlement / Status Hearing, and a written report is then provided to the Court five days before trial if the case does not secourt at a Settlement / Status Hearing, and a written report is then provided to the Court five days before trial if the case does not seCourt five days before trial if the case does not settle.

An oral report of assessment is made in open court at a Settlement / Status Hearing and the parties may order a transcript of the oral report for use at trial.

Pursuant to Rule 1:2 - 1 all trials, hearings of motions and other applications, pretrial conferences, arraignments, sentencing conferences and appeals shall be conducted in open court, unless otherwise provided by rule or statute.

The case was heard in small claims court, being a venue open to the public.