It wasn't until I asked him if he'd
heard of free speech that the tone changed.
Not exact matches
So many people who advocate or speak publicly for political or personal reasons aren't acknowledged as much when it comes to religion when someone is wanting to speak out about there faith a light bulb goes off and says we don't want to
hear, or talk, or, air any thing that has to do with the mentioning
of God but because
of the high profile story and because this is the President
of the United States it's ok hats off to them for not being ashamed to speak about there faith I agree with Richard some people just because they profess there faith doesn't mean there trying to push there beliefs on anyone people
of faith have a right to
free speech also.
If I am to have a right to
free speech, for example, then I must be empowered to speak and be
heard, which means using the power
of the state to give me the resources I need and to suppress anything that might disempower me.
and be
heard while quashing any remonstrations and denying the
free speech of opposing viewpoints.
After
hearing the President's
speech and seeing the headlines
of the Washington Post on yesterday, «You Are Not alone», he placed on his website a dedication to the victims and a
free download
of the song to anyone.
We have rights to
free speech just as you do and I, for one, am SICK TO DEATH
of hearing just your side
of things!
I had not realized until
hearing a recent NPR story how many ways there are to understand the concept
of «
free speech».
Something about the campus environment predisposes students to react to seemingly negligible events (an email about Halloween costumes, rumors
of exclusion from a frat party, one person
hearing racial slurs from a passing driver) with shocking levels
of anxiety, including a particular distress about
free and therefore potentially offensive
speech.
On the evaluation front... don't know if you have them in your neck
of the woods, but around here Area Education Agencies do
free of charge evaluations for
speech and
hearing issues and also provide assistance on sliding scale basis.
«They say they support
free speech, yet they attempted to disrupt a
hearing and prevent members
of the Elections Committee from taking testimony on the City's taxpayer - funded election system.
Green Party leaders congratulated voters in Kent, Ohio, for passing Issue 43, which called for a constitutional amendment to end corporate personhood and abolish the legal definition
of money as
free speech, as well as establishment
of an annual «Democracy Day» public
hearing for residents to testify on the effect
of big contributions from corporations and the wealthy on elections.
Regardless
of the outcome
of the
hearing, Paladino has already filed a federal lawsuit against the board, charging that his constitutional rights to
free speech have been violated.
Once everyday ordinary New Yorkers start
hearing and learning about her malicious attacks on religious
free speech, religious business owners and her treatment
of constituencies that are represented by council members that she wants to punish they will be inclined to be turned off by her.
A spokesman, Scott Reif, said the groups that advocated public financing «say they support
free speech, yet they attempted to disrupt a
hearing and prevent members
of the Elections Committee from taking testimony.»
The Supreme Court announced today that it will
hear a case brought by ten teachers who say that California's requirement that they pay the equivalent
of union dues violates their
free speech rights.
The U.S. Supreme Court declined last week to
hear two appeals involving the
free -
speech rights
of educators involving school matters.
Screening is a
free check
of a child's
hearing and vision, height and weight, immunizations, motor skills,
speech and language skills, and general development.
The last I
heard, the first ammendment gives us all the right
of free speech (you have it too).
Far too often, I
hear voices calling for genocide against members
of certain faiths and regions
of the planet without the corresponding denunciations to be satisfied that
speech can be as
free as it ought to be.
It's not a right to
free speech that's at issue here, it's a case
of ensuring that both sides are
heard by a decision maker.