Sentences with phrase «heard on this matter whether»

Everyone has a right to be heard on this matter whether you agree with the viewpoints they have or not.

Not exact matches

By press time, ETHNews had not heard back from Campbell on this matter, nor on the question of whether the requirement to report bitcoin holdings applies to every person submitting an SF86, or just to certain parties.

It is a particularly troubling matter when God goes silent on us, when we can't hear his voice at all, whether it's a tender whisper of encouragement, raucous laughter, or a thundering rebuke, it is then that we are most keenly aware of God.

No matter whether one finally jumps on the Hartshornian bandwagon or not, the most important duty is to hear him carefully and fairly.

The judge who will rule on the matter, state Supreme Court Judge Lisa Fisher — who was elected in a 2014 upset running as a Republican — noted at one point that there is «a thin line on whether the court can hear this case.»

Anybody who stands near enough to me that they can hear my voice will already know how much I love my Apple trackpad (no matter whether it is the one built - in to my Macbook Pro, or the external one I use when the machine is docked on my desk).

The remark was made in the case of Chai v Peng [2014] EWHC 750 (Fam), [2014] All ER (D) 243 (Mar) where a couple had managed to spend # 1.6 m in legal costs on preliminary hearings; namely whether the matter should be dealt with in this country or in Malaysia or, indeed, in Canada where there had also been some litigation.

This months» Your Thoughts hears from a variety of experts on the matter, to whether or not the government's plans are realistic, how it will affect those claiming and insurance companies themselves and the general consequences of these new plans.

In Smuk, McFarlane J.A. stated at paragraph three: When a witness, whether an accused or not, sits in court and hears the testimony of another witness on a subject matter as to which he later testifies, his evidence is open to the suggestion that it may have been made deliberately to conform.

(2) If, after a panel of the Hearings Tribunal begins holding a hearing respecting a matter and before it reaches a decision on all the issues before it, a member who is a representative of employers or employees dies or becomes incapacitated, another panel of the Tribunal shall decide whether,

While an oral hearing may be ordered to determine whether leave should be granted, in practice the matter is usually decided on the written record before the Supreme Court.

The former employee relied on the following grounds in his judicial review: bias of the adjudicator; fairness of the hearing; appropriateness of deciding the matter solely on the basis of abuse of process, and; whether the matter of genuineness of the emails was properly determined.

The Commission will review your complaint and determine if it can accept it; The Respondent, or other party, will be notified, receive a copy of the complaint and have a chance to respond; There will be a voluntary conciliation — the Commission assigns a conciliator to try help and resolve the differences between the parties; The Commission assigns an investigator to gather information related to the complaint, consult with the parties on the results of the investigation, and assess whether there is a reasonable basis to proceed with the complaint process; If there is a reasonable basis to proceed with the complaint, the Commission will ask the parties to reach a settlement; and If the investigation does not show a reasonable basis to proceed with the complaint process, then the complaint is dismissed; The Director of the Commission may discontinue a complaint if the Director believes that the complainant has refused to accept a fair / reasonable settlement offer — this can be appealed; and Last, the matter is referred to the Human Rights panel for a hearing.

And we might also note that leave applications under the Municipal Government Act before Justice Veldhuis seem to turn primarily on whether the applicant can demonstrate it has a reasonable prospect of success if the matter is heard on its merits.

Whether a matter is heard on the Commercial List is still in the discretion of the Commercial List judges, and it is required that the matter have some factual connection to Toronto.

This decision was appealed to the Ontario Court of Appeal, where, in a well written and reasoned decision, Justice Doherty, speaking for the panel, upheld Justice Morrocco's decision and remitted the matter to the preliminary hearing Judge to make the final determination on whether or not N. S. could testify behind the veil.