Sentences with phrase «heard oral arguments»

Supreme Court heard oral arguments on September 7, 2016.
The Supreme Court this week heard oral arguments in the Hawkes vs. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers case, which questions whether the Army Corps...
On Jan. 15, the U.S. Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Koontz v. St. Johns River Water Management District.
The Supreme Court this week heard oral arguments in the Hawkes vs. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers case, which questions whether the Army Corps of Engineers» «jurisdictional determinations» (JDs)- an official decision as to whether or not a wetland is regulated by the Corps of Engineers - are «final agency actions» that are subject to judicial review.
Today, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Janus v. AFSCME, a historic case that will impact working people's freedom to join together fight for decent and equitable pay, affordable health care, quality schools, vibrant communities and a secure future for all of us.
On April 23, the Court also heard oral arguments in Pereira v. Sessions.
On Tuesday, March 27, the Court heard oral arguments in Hughes v. United States.
The Supreme Court of the United States heard oral arguments in both cases this morning.
Yesterday, the Supreme Court heard the oral arguments in the B.C. hearing fees case, now known as Trial Lawyers Association of British Columbia v. British Columbia (Attorney General), a case I have much blogged about as it made its way through the B.C. courts (where it was known Villardell v. Dunham, both on trial and on appeal).
After justices have heard oral arguments and reviewed attorneys» written materials, known as briefs, they issue written decisions or opinions.
February 26, 2014 was an important day for tech and other companies that have found, or might potentially find, themselves becoming the target of what are known as non-practicing entities (or «patent trolls»), as the Supreme Court heard oral arguments on two «fee shifting» cases, Octane Fitness v. Icon Health and Fitness, and Highmark v. Allcare Health Management Systems.
Thirty years ago today, the Nine Wise Souls heard oral arguments in the seminal case, the kingpin - opinion, the granddaddy precedent, in what I do.
On 7th February the US Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals heard oral arguments, via telephone, from both parties.
The supreme court heard oral arguments in the case on October 8 and is expected to rule by the end of the year.
In Canada, the Federal Court recently heard oral arguments in Amazon.com, Inc. v.
That was the issue yesterday as the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in the case of Chambers v. United States.
Shortly after the Supreme Court heard oral arguments yesterday in Ayotte v. Planned Parenthood, we recorded the Coast to Coast program, Supreme Court and the Abortion Issue.
On September 27, ten judges heard oral arguments in a consolidated case known as West Virginia, et al. v. EPA, which challenges the agency's power to require states to restructure their energy mixes and to reorganize their energy economies across electric plants, energy - intensive industries, and even households.
The U.S. Supreme Court heard oral arguments two weeks ago over the future of demand response (essentially smart grids) in wholesale energy markets.
On September 27, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia heard oral arguments in a major challenge to the Clean Power Plan, West Virginia v. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency — an enormously high - stakes legal battle, that could determine whether Obama's climate plan is ever put into effect.
On Tuesday a federal court in Washington D.C. heard oral arguments on a historic case — a legal challenge to the Environmental Protection Agency's science - based determination that heat - trapping greenhouse gas pollution is a threat to our health and well - being.
On Tuesday a federal court in Washington D.C. heard oral arguments on a legal challenge to the EPA finding that greenhouse gas pollution is a threat to our health and well - being.
Update: Non-economic Damages Case for Pet Death Last week, the Texas Supreme Court heard oral arguments in the case of Medlen v. Strickland.
On April 16, the New Hampshire Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Duncan v. State of New Hampshire, a lawsuit brought by the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) and Americans United -LSB-...]
On Thursday morning, the State Supreme Court heard oral arguments on the constitutionality of charter schools in Washington State.
Soon after the Court heard oral arguments, Justice Antonin Scalia died, and the case dead - locked on a 4 - to - 4 vote.
Soon after the Court heard oral arguments, Justice Antonin Scalia died, and the case dead - locked in a 4 - to - 4 vote.
On the day that the U.S. Supreme Court heard oral arguments in the Friedrichs v. California Teachers Association union membership case, U.S. Congressman Mark Pocan gave a shout - out on his Facebook page to Beloit Education Association President Tim Vedra and highlighted the important role that unions play in serving students:
Posted on September 10, 2015 · Last week, (Tuesday 9/1/15), the Texas Supreme Court heard oral arguments over whether the way the state funds public schools is constitutional.
The State Supreme Court heard oral arguments Wednesday morning in a challenge of the state's voucher law.
Yesterday, I was in the room as Hinds County Chancery Court Judge Dewayne Thomas heard oral arguments in the lawsuit filed by the Southern Poverty Law Center attempting to shut down Mississippi's public charter schools.
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court heard oral arguments this week on a school funding lawuit.
On Monday February 26, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments for Janus v. AFSCME, a case that will determine the future of public sector unions in America...
The Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court heard oral arguments in the case earlier this month.
On Wednesday, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Trinity Lutheran Church v. Comer and seemed troubled by a Missouri grant program that bars state money from going to religious schools for playground improvement.
Several Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court asked last week whether federal - court supervision of the Kansas City, Mo., school district has gone too far as the Court heard oral arguments in a major school - desegregation case.
On Wednesday, the Star Tribune's Beena Raghavendran reported that the Minnesota Court of Appeals heard oral arguments for a lawsuit in which a group of parents are challenging the constitutionality of Minnesota's teacher tenure, dismissal, and «last in, first out» laws.
On January 11, 2017 the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in the most important special education case in thirty - five years, Endrew F. v. Douglas County School District.
The U.S. Supreme Court just heard oral arguments in the case of Janus v. AFSCME, which could substantially limit public - sector union membership and financial support.
The members of the court, including Trump appointee Neil Gorsuch, heard oral arguments in Janus v. AFSCME in late February and appear poised to follow the administration's advice.
The Florida Supreme Court heard oral arguments June 7 in a case that could determine the future of school vouchers in the state and set the pace for school choice policies across the nation.
On Wednesday, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Trinity Lutheran Church v. Comer.
The Supreme Court heard oral arguments on Obama's immigration policy this week.
On February 9, the Massachusetts State Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Libertarian Political Association v Galvin, sj 2011 - 0348.
The court, which heard oral arguments Friday in the Washington County...
In a case that could upend New York's political landscape, a state Supreme Court justice heard oral arguments on Wednesday in a lawsuit seeking to eliminate the so - called «LLC loophole» in state election law, which has given developers and other deep - pocketed donors the ability give essentially unlimited campaign donations to state politicians.
In a case that could upend New York's political landscape, a state Supreme Court justice heard oral arguments in a lawsuit seeking to eliminate the so - called «LLC loophole» in state election law, which has given developers and other deep - pocketed donors the ability give essentially unlimited campaign donations to state politicians.
The seven - member Court of Appeals heard oral arguments yesterday in two cases where a midlevel appellate court unanimously concluded last year that state oil and gas law doesn't trump the authority of local governments to control land use.
A Westchester County Supreme Court judge heard oral arguments on the dispute and is expected to rule Wednesday, said Elliott's attorney, Marc Landis.
Judge Randolph Moss, U.S. District judge for the District of Columbia, heard oral arguments on Aug. 25 in the first hearing in the case brought by the National Association for Fixed Annuities.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z