When is the last time you have
heard the gospel presented as «Believe and be saved?»
Not exact matches
The convictionâ $» endemic among churchfolkâ $» persists that, if problems of misapprehension and misrepresentation are overcome and the
gospel can be
heard in its own integrity, the
gospel will be found attractive by people, become popular, and, even, be a success of some sortâ $ ¦ This idea is both curious and ironical because it is bluntly contradicted in Scripture and in the experience of the continuing biblical witness in history from the event of Pentecost unto the
present momentâ $ (William Stringfellow, quoted in A Keeper of the Word, p. 348).
But in the
present time, altogether too many of us may know or think we know the original quite well, but yet do not know the language into which we are to translate; hence the
gospel as preached is preached to ears that do not and can not
hear, because they are ears that are attuned to a quite different set of conditions, patterns of thought, and ways of conceiving the universe.
The Gospels have in their way met this problem, not only by placing the kerygma on Jesus» lips, but also by
presenting individual units from the tradition in such a way that the whole
gospel becomes visible: At the call of Levi, we
hear (Mark 2.17): «I came not to call the righteous, but sinners»; at the healing of the deaf - mute, we
hear (Mark 7.37): «He has done all things well; he even makes the deaf
hear and the dumb speak.»
21 And you, that were sometime alienated and enemies in [your] mind by wicked works, yet now hath he reconciled 22 In the body of his flesh through death, to
present you holy and unblameable and unreproveable in his sight: 23 If ye continue in the faith grounded and settled, and [be] not moved away from the hope of the
gospel, which ye have
heard, [and] which was preached to every creature which is under heaven; whereof I Paul am made a minister;
I can't tell you how many times I have
heard on the radio, or have read in books, or have listened to people share their testimony, and the way they
present the
Gospel is completely unscriptural!
An excellent illustration is to be found in I Corinthians 11 where Paul's text is the tradition («The Lord Jesus, on the night in which he was betrayed, took bread...»).14 His text, translated and proclaimed for the Corinthian situation, stands now as our text for proclamation to the situation of the
present hearers, a situation that will, in dialogue with the text, create a new speaking and
hearing of the
Gospel.
Sharing the
gospel means at least two things: the essence of the
gospel must be
presented in such a way that it may be seen and
heard for what it truly is; it must also be
presented in such a way that it may be either accepted or rejected.
Meanwhile these same laymen continue to
hear and assent without much protest to the
gospel as they
hear it preached; for when
presented in broad enough generalizations, it sounds familiar, true, and virtuous.
When a Crusade Evangelist gets all the glamor, glitz, and glory of
presenting the «
Gospel» to millions of people, and the people
hear a message about being born again, and then those who respond attend a church without all the glamor, glitz, and glory, and they
hear a message about discipleship, following Jesus, danger, famine, persecution, and suffering, they rightfully feel that somebody is not being honest.
I can testify that Christ indeed is a very
present help in a time of trouble and the
gospel message is
heard and understood most clearly in a time of suffering.
Nonetheless, such a perspective still
presents an obligation to search to identify where the
gospel is being preached and
heard and the sacraments administered and to express our unity visibly.