It was a good post, but I felt I needed to take the other side of the argument, because I have
heard this argument too much recently.
Not exact matches
The eight - justice court is
hearing arguments Monday in two cases that deal with the same basic issue of whether race played
too large a role in the drawing of electoral districts, to the detriment of African - Americans.
I've
heard the
arguments of some preachers
too: that some debt is a sin but other sources of debt are not, or, as you say, «
too much» debt is a sin.
Honestly, as a «former» mega-church attender, I
heard the grape juice
argument too many times to count.
The most common complaint I
hear about this diet is that «it costs
too much to eat healthy»... well, I have an
argument to that!
I have
heard the jaundice
argument, and I have read it be refuted
too.
As a student midwife in AZ, I have
heard the same
argument about not being educated from the medical camp
too.
Zemsky told the Assembly members that it's
too early to judge Start - Up NY, and he continued that
argument outside the
hearing, saying, «take a deep breath,» and give the program «some more time» as he spoke with reporters.
Without
hearing their
arguments, it is
too early to set the field.
Other
arguments I've
heard is to prevent a
too large number of candidates to take part, but a requirement of presenting at a minimum number of signatures should sufficiently prevent that.
They,
too, were coming to talk about immigration, and after
hearing about the earlier confrontation, the lawmakers were bracing for another
argument.
The real problem remains however as to how exactly the
arguments can be got across to the public when the media, and particularly the tabloids, are determined not to give a fair
hearing to potential strikers, but will seize the opportunity to demonise the unions (and the Labour Party
too) as wreckers or worse.
Zemsky told the Assembly members that it's
too early to judge Start UP, and he continued that
argument outside the
hearing, speaking with reporters, saying - «take a deep breath», and give the program «some more time».
Then, of course, there is the Japanese paradox - also known as «they eat rice all the time and live a long time so I should be able to eat pizza and Doritos and live to be 100
too» (exaggeration but I've
heard some
arguments very close to that)
I've
heard some very good film critics make this
argument before,
too.
But the commonly
heard argument that the declining economic prospects of men are the culprit in this story about unwed births is
too simple.
Several Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court asked last week whether federal - court supervision of the Kansas City, Mo., school district has gone
too far as the Court
heard oral
arguments in a major school - desegregation case.
She also
hears arguments asserting that the adolescent has only the «vaguest notion» of what could happen to him if he does not receive blood, with the reasoning being that the information would be
too distressing for an already seriously ill boy.
SFReader, I
hear the
argument that «everybody's going to pirate anyway so why bother with DRM» from pirates way
too often.
I
hear you on the «it's
too late to buy one of the existing devices»
argument.
How many times must we
hear the
argument that electric shock collars have saved the lives of dogs considered to be
too unruly or
too untrustworthy to co-exist in human society?
We've all
heard the
arguments: «Switch is
too weak to run AAA third party games.»
[Response: Amazingly enough, one
hears this
argument all the time (though I've never seen it actually written down, presumably because it would be
too easy a target).
It's circular reasoning, and it's the same
argument that we
heard all last fall as part of the fact - free DOE FERC proposal, which boils down to this: our assets can't compete in the marketplace because they're
too expensive, so you (meaning, the ratepayer) should pay us more money to stay online.
The Judge
hearing the case concluded that the restrictive covenant in question was «manifestly
too wide» and that the
arguments advanced by A via its lawyers were simply «wrong».
A circuit judge
hearing might possibly be the answer to a party's
argument that the case is
too complex to be dealt with by a district judge in the small claims track and should be allocated upwards (see CPR 26.1).
Now I've
heard the
arguments from other agents for not taking the troubled or «cheap» listings: It will cost me money to work in a lower price point; I'm
too busy to dedicate time to small deals; I can't afford to spend the marketing dollars for a home that won't earn me a decent commission.