Sentences with phrase «hearing on climate science»

Citing a flurry of inaccuracies and misleading statements at a recent hearing on climate science, Vice Ranking Member on the House Committee on Science, Space, and Technology Rep. Don Beyer (D - VA) this week submitted a collection of scientific rebuttals to false or misleading statements made in that hearing.

At Tuesday's House Energy & Commerce Committee hearing on Climate Science and EPA's Greenhouse Gas Regulation, Dr. Christopher Field of the Carnegie Institution for Science, presented a scary assessment of global warming's impact on U.S. grain yields.

With a decision that could have far - reaching implications, a federal judge in California has ordered the first ever U.S. court hearing on climate science for a «public nuisance» lawsuit, meaning that major oil and gas companies for the first time may have to go on the record regarding what they knew about the planetary impacts of their products — and when.

This morning I listened to the recent hearing on climate science for the house of representatives committee on science, space, and technology.

And the environment committee, which plays a central role in writing climate and energy legislation, hasn't held a hearing on climate science since early 2009.

A Dot Earth reader, J. Connors, reacted to my piece on the post-election prospect for hostile hearings on climate science by posting a spot - on comment about the real threat to such science in the new political climate:

The House Science Committee held Congress» first hearings on climate science in 1976, and it resulted in passage of bipartisan legislation to establish a National Climate Program Office.

It's worth noting here that congressional hearings on climate science have been confined to examining cases where adjustments to the surface temperature measurements increase global warming trends.

Not exact matches

They toured IRRI's research facilities and heard updates on the science and partnership between the two organizations, including the latest on climate change - ready rice varieties.

The letter comes on the eve of a House hearing on the legality of the subpoenas issued by the House Committee on Science, Space and Technology to Schneiderman's office over the investigation over whether major energy companies downplayed the risks of climate change.

On his way to the first of six meetings on Capitol Hill as part of his inaugural participation in Climate Science Day events that bring scientists to Congress each year to offer lawmakers and their staff assistance and scientific resources relating to climate science, Kennedy ran into a crowd waiting to watch Day Two of federal Judge Neil Gorsuch's Supreme Court confirmation hearingOn his way to the first of six meetings on Capitol Hill as part of his inaugural participation in Climate Science Day events that bring scientists to Congress each year to offer lawmakers and their staff assistance and scientific resources relating to climate science, Kennedy ran into a crowd waiting to watch Day Two of federal Judge Neil Gorsuch's Supreme Court confirmation hearingon Capitol Hill as part of his inaugural participation in Climate Science Day events that bring scientists to Congress each year to offer lawmakers and their staff assistance and scientific resources relating to climate science, Kennedy ran into a crowd waiting to watch Day Two of federal Judge Neil Gorsuch's Supreme Court confirmation heClimate Science Day events that bring scientists to Congress each year to offer lawmakers and their staff assistance and scientific resources relating to climate science, Kennedy ran into a crowd waiting to watch Day Two of federal Judge Neil Gorsuch's Supreme Court confirmation heScience Day events that bring scientists to Congress each year to offer lawmakers and their staff assistance and scientific resources relating to climate science, Kennedy ran into a crowd waiting to watch Day Two of federal Judge Neil Gorsuch's Supreme Court confirmation heclimate science, Kennedy ran into a crowd waiting to watch Day Two of federal Judge Neil Gorsuch's Supreme Court confirmation hescience, Kennedy ran into a crowd waiting to watch Day Two of federal Judge Neil Gorsuch's Supreme Court confirmation hearings.

Hundreds of global warming skeptics are in Washington to hear attacks on mainstream climate science and responses to it, like renewable energy programs and federal initiatives to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.

WASHINGTON, D.C. — President - elect Donald Trump's choice to lead the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency expressed doubt about the science behind global climate change during a contentious Senate confirmation hearing on Wednesday, but added he would be obliged for now to uphold the EPA's finding carbon dioxide poses a public danger.

«I am going to protect all of the science, whether it's related to the climate or other aspects of what we're going to be doing,» Perry told a Senate committee during a 19 January hearing on his nomination.

«I've heard some folks try to dodge the evidence by saying they're not scientists; that we don't have enough information to act,» he continued, in a comment clearly aimed at Republican politicians who have used that line in an effort to avoid taking a position on the reliability of climate science.

Richard Lindzen testifies at a House Science Committee hearing on global climate change on Nov 17, 2010.

Participants will have the opportunity to hear from leading experts from the University of Minnesota on their climate science research, engage with hands - on activities, and learn about how Climate Generation curriculum supports language arts, social studies, and science standards, including the Next Generation Science Staclimate science research, engage with hands - on activities, and learn about how Climate Generation curriculum supports language arts, social studies, and science standards, including the Next Generation Science Stascience research, engage with hands - on activities, and learn about how Climate Generation curriculum supports language arts, social studies, and science standards, including the Next Generation Science StaClimate Generation curriculum supports language arts, social studies, and science standards, including the Next Generation Science Stascience standards, including the Next Generation Science StaScience Standards.

I once heard John Holdren (President Obama's science advisor) speak on the issue of uncertainty in climate predictions.

A federal judge in San Francisco has ordered parties in a landmark global warming lawsuit to hold what could be the first - ever U.S. court hearing on the science of climate change....

Found at Tenney Naumer's blog if you want more info: http://climatechangepsychology.blogspot.com/2011/03/congressional-hearing-climate-change.html «Congressional hearing: «Climate Change: Examining the Processes Used to Create Science and Policy,» on March 31, 2011, to have real time commentary by leading climate scientists in order to correct misleading and inaccurate testimony — available to journalists — additionally, a teleconference follows hearing (with Kevin Trenberth, Andrew Dessler, and Gary Yohe)climate-change.html «Congressional hearing: «Climate Change: Examining the Processes Used to Create Science and Policy,» on March 31, 2011, to have real time commentary by leading climate scientists in order to correct misleading and inaccurate testimony — available to journalists — additionally, a teleconference follows hearing (with Kevin Trenberth, Andrew Dessler, and Gary Yohe)Climate Change: Examining the Processes Used to Create Science and Policy,» on March 31, 2011, to have real time commentary by leading climate scientists in order to correct misleading and inaccurate testimony — available to journalists — additionally, a teleconference follows hearing (with Kevin Trenberth, Andrew Dessler, and Gary Yohe)climate scientists in order to correct misleading and inaccurate testimony — available to journalists — additionally, a teleconference follows hearing (with Kevin Trenberth, Andrew Dessler, and Gary Yohe)»

But somehow or other, the subcommittee on energy and the environment of the House Committee on Science and Technology today pulled off a (relatively) civil hearing on basic questions related to climate science and policy oScience and Technology today pulled off a (relatively) civil hearing on basic questions related to climate science and policy oscience and policy options.

It's useful to think of this as an example of Bayesian priors in action — given that 99 % of the criticisms we hear about climate science are bogus or based on deep confusions about what modeling is for, scepticism is an appropriate first response, but because we are actually scientists, not shills, we are happy to correct real errors — sometimes they will matter, and sometimes they won't.

But I don't hear the pro-AGW camp telling him he's not qualified to talk on climate science.

James Hansen of NASA testifying this year at a House Oversight and Government Reform Committee hearing on political interference with government climate science.

I would rather spend my time on site that are hearing from voices on many spectrums: mainstream papers that have top - notch science coverage and a climate focus, or open - minded debates between environmentalists on both sides of the political arena.

given that 99 % of the criticisms we hear about climate science are bogus or based on deep confusions about what modeling is for

Most of the arguments I hear from science illiterate politicians are based on an assumption that climate is a closed static system.

In this it shares a lot of characteristics with some of the engineering and social sciences for example (as an aside I get a wry smile when I hear people say climate science is unique because we only have one experiment, and think about the way social scientists leap on those rare longitudinal studies to help them understand things like learning and criminal behaviour).

What is certain enough in climate science that you feel you would not waste congressional hearing time on?

On Thursday, May 20th, the Select Committee on Energy Independence and Global Warming will hold a hearing to examine the intersection between climate science and the political procesOn Thursday, May 20th, the Select Committee on Energy Independence and Global Warming will hold a hearing to examine the intersection between climate science and the political proceson Energy Independence and Global Warming will hold a hearing to examine the intersection between climate science and the political process.

Gleick's testimony was provided to the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation hearing on Climate Change Research and Science Integrity Wednesday.

DeSmog reported that the House Committee on Science, Space and Technology hearings «have officially turned into theater to stage climate science denial,» noting that Michael Mann was the only witness on the committee to represent the 97 % consensus view that humans cause climate Science, Space and Technology hearings «have officially turned into theater to stage climate science denial,» noting that Michael Mann was the only witness on the committee to represent the 97 % consensus view that humans cause climate science denial,» noting that Michael Mann was the only witness on the committee to represent the 97 % consensus view that humans cause climate change.

In a recent hearing, Oklahoma Sen. Jim Inhofe, who chairs the Senate environment committee, lambasted a senior EPA official, insisting that the science on climate change is not settled.

They misrepresent the state of climate science, reciting talking points that can be found on any of a number of denialist websites, or heard at conferences sponsored by fossil - fuel funded groups such as the American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC).

US Senate, Nov 16, 2004 hearing on Arctic and Antarctic Climate Change by the Commerce, Science and Transportation Committee.

Since the chair of the science committee in today's hearing on climate change brought the papers critiquing the Cook et al study into public record, this brought me back here.

It appears likely that this is because the CIC does not believe there should be any real debate on climate science or any other science - based issue coming before EPA and that the SAB should only hear the views of those who closely support the tenets of those who are willing to overthrow science - based environmental regulation in favor of climate alarmism and environmental extremism.

At a May 29 House Science Committee hearing on the IPCC's «process», climate science assessment was collateral damage in the Republican war on greenhouse gas regulatory Science Committee hearing on the IPCC's «process», climate science assessment was collateral damage in the Republican war on greenhouse gas regulatory science assessment was collateral damage in the Republican war on greenhouse gas regulatory policy.

Sen. Frank R. Lautenberg, 1/23/24 — 6/3/13, R.I.P. I had the opportunity to answer questions from Senator Lautenberg about Bush administration political interference with climate science communication at a Senate hearing on Climate Change Research and Scientific Integrity iclimate science communication at a Senate hearing on Climate Change Research and Scientific Integrity iClimate Change Research and Scientific Integrity in 2007.

Testimony at House Subcommittee on Science and Technology hearing on A Rational Discussion of Climate Change: the Science, the Evidence, the Response.

I also suggested that it is incomprehensible to me that a blog that has made the IPCC the object of scrutiny has «never heard of IIASA» when so many of their scientists are lead authors on IPCC reports, and dozens of their scientists have contributed as members of the research community, and their scientists are among the pioneers of climate science, and the person who is perhaps best know for his affiliation with IIASA is a close colleague of the blog owner.

«Perspective on Climate Change» (PDF), Testimony prepared by Bjorn Lomborg for the Subcommittee on Energy and Air Quality joint hearing with the Subcommittee on Energy and Environment of the Committee on Science and Technology on Wednesday March 21, 2007.

Here is literally every reason I've heard on why to trust models - They're based on science - They agree with past climate - They're the best we've got - It's really urgent so we have to trust something The first two arguments just make it a model at best a hypothesis.

Climate Science Watch Director Rick Piltz's testimony for the February 7, 2007, Senate Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation hearing on «Climate Change Research and Scientific Integrity.»

From an emailed PRESS RELEASE on March 5, 2010 Climate scientist delivers false statement in parliament enquiry It has come to our attention, that last Monday (March 1), Dr. Phil Jones, head of the Climatic Research Unit at the University of East Anglia (CRU), in a hearing with the House of Commons Science and Technology -LSB-...]

A U.S. District Court in San Francisco will be the setting for a first - ever hearing on the science of climate change, scheduled for March 21 by William Alsup, a federal judge.

Republican Lamar Smith, chairman of the committee, opened the hearing by saying «alarmist predictions amount to nothing more than wild guesses» and that «much of climate science today seems to be based more on exaggerations, personal agendas and questionable predictions than on the scientific methods.»

In the five - hour hearing, both the cities and the oil companies will have a chance to present Alsup with their views on the history of climate change science, and the most important recent findings in the field.

Prior to attending the conference, Fellows will participate in a daylong orientation session that will augment their understanding of climate science and the current state of the talks, as well as a chance to hear from EJN experts on how to maximize coverage opportunities.

The U.S. District Court of Northern California will hear a five - hour «tutorial» on climate science on Wednesday.