Clement et al. published a response together with the Zhang et al. comment in Science, in which they use Zhang et al.'s results to show that the low - pass surface
heat budget reflects a long - term balanced state.
Not exact matches
Additionally the oceanic warming and cooling cycles introduce constant, rapid and substantial changes not yet
reflected in any models and which invalidate any averaged global estimates of the planetary
heat budget.
Is the Warmista position that IR is only partially
reflected by clouds and that only
heating from IR should be taken into account and, therefore, that the decreased surface warming described by Willis is irrelevant to Earth's energy
budget?