Not exact matches
Cox et al.'s calculations were also based on another assumption somewhat related to
different time scales for
different feedback
mechanisms: a constant «
heat capacity» represented
by C in the equation above.
The half - life for air is probably
different than that of water, but the question is «How can anyone dismiss the impact of
heat emissions without knowing how rapidly this
heat is dissipated,
by whatever
mechanisms, into outer space?»
Heat picked up at the surface is thus rapidly vertically mixed and transported
by all three
mechanisms — conduction, convection and radiation — acting at
different length scales and with considerable and non-ignorable chaotic and self - organized emergent mesoscale structure — to produce an atmosphere that, as you note, ends up somewhere between the DALR and isothermal most of the time, although inversions (warmer on top) or with a gradient even larger than the DALR happen all the time, and are unstable or transiently metastable states with some lifetime and break apart and perhaps reform somewhere else as the conditions that favor them recur.
The
mechanism is named after the effect of solar radiation passing through glass and warming a greenhouse, but the way it retains
heat is fundamentally
different as a greenhouse works
by reducing airflow, isolating the warm air inside the structure so that
heat is not lost
by convection.»
The greenhouse effect and a real greenhouse are similar in that they both limit the rate of thermal energy flowing out of the system, but the
mechanisms by which
heat is retained are
different.
For instance,
heat is not so much radiated in space as carried
by air currents — an entirely
different mechanism, which can not cause global warming.