The latter theory is analogous to cooking oatmeal: Heat at the bottom causes the oatmeal to rise, and
heat loss along the top surface cools the oatmeal, causing it to sink.
Not exact matches
Those same lakes,
along with other evidence from around the world, also points to the shifting of rain belts after a rapid
loss of Arctic sea ice about 14,600 years ago that saw the Northern Hemisphere
heat up faster than the Southern.
And the efficiency of this
heat loss is dependent on the area of moist tissue that extends
along the length of the normal canine muzzle.
But if you accept that the greenhouse effect is real, and that CO2 is a GHG, and that CO2 has increased (
along with other GHGs), you have to accept the merit of my point: that solar, volcanoes, ocean currents and other natural variations do their thing, they vary, but GHGs exert a steady, constant upward forcing on temperature, which upward forcing is only offset by increased
heat losses to space from a warmer planet.
Able to proficiently perform soldering and brazing work
along with calculating basic
heat loading and
heat loss calculations.