What's lacking in the efficiency rating for the unvented gas appliance is the latent
heat of the water vapor.
However, if you have a tight house that does not need additional humidification in the winter, you can still recover some of the latent
heat of the water vapor from an unvented heater by letting it condense on the windows, but maybe that is not a good idea.
If even a very small fraction of the total energy stored in the latent
heat of water vapor or from the heat of tropical ocean waters could be captured and converted into mechanical energy, we would be able to meet a large portion of our present and future energy needs.
Pat wrote: «But TOA radiative loss can just as easily be through the latent
heat of water vapor condensation in the upper atmosphere.
This transition of state of water relates to the basic physical processes of adiabatic cooling and
heating of water vapor.
Not exact matches
They have an inbuilt
heating system that provides a warm mist
of water vapor laden air.
It would provide important insight into how much SRM would reduce radiative
heating, the concentration
of water vapor in the stratosphere, and the processes that determine
water vapor transport — which affects the concentration
of ozone.
So this effect could either be the result
of natural variability in Earth's climate, or yet another effect
of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases like
water vapor trapping more
heat and thus warming sea - surface temperatures.
However,
heating of the ejecta and the low escape velocity from Mars suggests that
water vapor would have been lost, implying that the moons will be dry if they formed by impact.»
In the morning, the chamber is closed, and sunlight entering through a window on top
of the device then
heats up the MOF, which liberates the
water droplets and drives them — as
vapor — toward the cooler condenser.
The impactor's kinetic energy is transformed into
heat, which melts the permafrost, releasing methane and
water vapor and expanding the size
of the resulting crater by as much as a quarter.
Instead
of dissipating into space, the infrared radiation that is absorbed by atmospheric
water vapor or carbon dioxide produces
heating, which in turn makes the earths surface warmer.
The next most abundant gases —
water vapor and carbon dioxide — do absorb a portion
of the infrared
heat radiated by the earth's surface, thereby preventing it from reaching space.
Cloudy, humid days reverse the cooling from both radiation and sublimation — cloud cover prevents snow from emitting energy, and condensation
of water vapor on the snow releases latent
heat, warming the snow.
In a matter
of seconds, when you put the food in the fryer,
water starts evaporating,
vapors form and escape the surface, oil penetration starts, and
heat begins to rise while at the same time there's evaporative cooling off at different points in the food.
For example, added
water vapor pumped into the upper atmosphere from the chimney increases the amount
of energy trapped there, in turn
heating the planet further.
The team chose the specific area examined in the study because it is Earth's warmest open ocean region and a primary source
of heat and
water vapor to the atmosphere.
Geochemist Richard Court
of Imperial College London published a report (covered in 80beats) showing that impacting rocks would have shed tremendous quantities
of carbon dioxide and
water vapor, both
of which effectively trap
heat.
According to the experiments
of Langley, the carbon dioxide and the
water vapor, which the atmosphere contains, are more opaque to the
heat rays
of great wave lengths which are emitted by the earth, than to the waves
of various lengths which emanate from the sun.
To
heat that boiler, the damp, crumbly brown coal known as lignite — which is even more polluting than the harder black anthracite variety — burns in the presence
of pure oxygen, a process known as oxyfuel, releasing as waste both
water vapor and that more notorious greenhouse gas, carbon dioxide (CO2).
The research, published yesterday in Nature Climate Change, outlines a counterintuitive side effect
of climate change: As higher temperatures drive plants and trees into areas now inhospitable to them, their new distribution speeds up temperature rise via natural processes such as releases
of heat - trapping
water vapor into the air.
A portion
of the sun's energy reaching Earth is captured and redistributed globally through latent
heat carried in
water vapor.
As tides raised by Jupiter in Europa's ocean rise and fall, they may cause cracking, additional
heating, and even venting
of water vapor into the airless sky above Europa's icy surface.
Scientists believe that
heat brings up
water vapor from the inside
of the planet, which condenses as it rises and produces
heat.
Lindzen was allowed to print his «Iris Theory» (stating that global warming might end because
of a natural increase in cooling - type clouds and less
water vapor - a
heat - trapping greenhouse gas) in Geophysical Research Letters (Jun. 26, 2001 - a legitimate peer - reviewed journal).
The small amount
of heat released when
water vapor condenses on ice crystals in Arctic clouds, which contain both
water and ice, determines the cloud's survival, according to scientists from Pacific Northwest National Laboratory and Environment Canada.
The study, published in the Journal
of Geophysical Research, shows how a few ice crystals can overcome numerous
water droplets in a
heated battle for
vapor within cold clouds.
Clouds
of water vapor around Ceres absorbed the
heat that radiates from the dwarf planet, which Herschel's instrument detected.
Water vapor can transport a lot of heat, so when Ceres formed 4.6 billion years ago, sublimation of water ice might have dissipated much of its heat into space, Campins and Comfort w
Water vapor can transport a lot
of heat, so when Ceres formed 4.6 billion years ago, sublimation
of water ice might have dissipated much of its heat into space, Campins and Comfort w
water ice might have dissipated much
of its
heat into space, Campins and Comfort wrote.
There is a clear impact on global temperature, too, though the mechanisms are complex:
heat released from the oceans; increases in
water vapor, which enhance the greenhouse effect, and redistributions
of clouds.
When an icy impact occurred, the impactor's kinetic energy became
heat energy, instantly melted some ice, gouged out a crater, and kicked up into Mars» thin atmosphere large amounts
of debris mixed with
water (liquid, ice crystals, and
vapor)-- and complex organic molecules that obviously came recently from life.127 Then, the dirt and salt -
water mixture settled back to the surface in vast layers
of thin sheets — strata — especially around the crater.
Our blood, which consists
of 20 percent
of the body's total
water, moves
heat away from our hands and feet when it needs to conserve
heat, and
water vapor in the form
of sweat helps to release excess
heat.
The process
of diffusing is simple; you add some oils into a
water and then either through
heat (with the candle) or the machine, the oils mix with
vapor and get diffused into the air.
While moving over the Great Lakes the dry, cold air loads up
water vapor and
heat from the lakes surfaces leading to strong snowfall downwind
of the lakes.
Greenhouse gases (which prevent dispersal
of heat generated by the planet's surface, after this receiving solar radiation)
of higher concentration on Earth are carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH 4), nitrous oxide (N2O), Compounds
of chlorofluorocarbon (CFC) and
water vapor (H2O).
This electricity used to power the vehicle, along with
heat and
water vapor, are the only byproducts
of fuel cells.
Predictions related to the impact
of pinatubo, post 1984 trends, the «satellite cooling» mismatch, lgm tropical sst,
water vapor increases, ocean
heat content etc have all been made and verified within a short time period.
That is the main source
of more
water vapor and energy (as latent
heat) in the air, and consequently weather trouble.
I ask this because, theoretically, given a relatively closed system, with
heat energy being added, thermal expansion and contraction
of gas and
water vapor, more wind speed, more shouldn't this also mean more extreme weather?
The height redistribution in the atmosphere
of condensation nuclei with a change
of the electric field
of the atmosphere is accompanied by a change in total latent
heat (phase transition
of water vapor), by changes in radiation balance, and by subsequent changes
of the thermobaric field
of troposphere.
Alternatively, more direct observations
of that radiative imbalance would be nice, or better theoretical and observational understanding
of the
water vapor and cloud feedbacks, or more paleoclimate data which can give us constraints on historical feedbacks, but my guess is that ocean
heat content measurements would be the best near term bet for improving our understanding
of this issue.
There's also a number
of interesting applications in the evolution
of Earth's atmosphere that branch off from the runaway greenhouse physics, for example how fast a magma - ocean covered early Earth ends up cooling — you can't lose
heat to space
of more than about 310 W / m2 or so for an Earth - sized planet with an efficient
water vapor feedback, so it takes much longer for an atmosphere - cloaked Earth to cool off from impact events than a body just radiating at sigmaT ^ 4.
Away from the dense network
of heat absorbing (daytime) then heat radiating (nighttime) structures which is the Urban Heat Island and above the air with high water vapor content trapped by the valley along the river, not to mention the pall of coal dust over the city, morning low temps were much more like what the natural countryside would experie
heat absorbing (daytime) then
heat radiating (nighttime) structures which is the Urban Heat Island and above the air with high water vapor content trapped by the valley along the river, not to mention the pall of coal dust over the city, morning low temps were much more like what the natural countryside would experie
heat radiating (nighttime) structures which is the Urban
Heat Island and above the air with high water vapor content trapped by the valley along the river, not to mention the pall of coal dust over the city, morning low temps were much more like what the natural countryside would experie
Heat Island and above the air with high
water vapor content trapped by the valley along the river, not to mention the pall
of coal dust over the city, morning low temps were much more like what the natural countryside would experience.
I am unconvinced that the presence
of feedback mechanisms will render climate change a self - limiting process — more
heat, more
water vapor / clouds, less sunlight ultimately abosrbed, etc..
The distance between them being governed by the height
of the Rossby convective plume, where
heat and
water vapor content suggest the residence time.
Water vapor, carbon dioxide, and a few other atmospheric gases act like the glass panes
of a greenhouse, allowing sunlight in to warm the planet but preventing
heat from escaping.
So as more CO2 gets pumped into the atmosphere the temperature rises, which causes more
water to evaporate (as you accurately state), increasing the concentration
of water vapor in the atmosphere — which
heats the atmosphere even more, causing even more
water vapor to enter the atmosphere.
The surface
heat capacity C (j = 0) was set to the equivalent
of a global layer
of water 50 m deep (which would be a layer ~ 70 m thick over the oceans) plus 70 %
of the atmosphere, the latent
heat of vaporization corresponding to a 20 % increase in
water vapor per 3 K warming (linearized for current conditions), and a little land surface; expressed as W * yr per m ^ 2 * K (a convenient unit), I got about 7.093.
Since many
of these processes result in non-symmetric time, location and temperature dependant feedbacks (eg
water vapor, clouds, CO2 washout, condensation, ice formation, radiative and convective
heat transfer etc) then how can a model that uses yearly average values for the forcings accurately reflect the results?
Some climate scientists see compelling arguments for accumulating
heat and added
water vapor fueling the kinds
of turbulent storms that spawn tornadoes.