But one of the most serious concerns lies in getting
heavy oil sands crude to refineries that can process it — an issue likely to grow in importance in coming years.
«It's bad for oil companies and the profit they were expecting from those projects, but from a climate perspective, it's tremendous,» said Danielle Droitsch, senior policy analyst at the Natural Resources Defense Council, one of many environmental groups that oppose extracting
the heavy oil sands crude.
Not exact matches
The U.S. can produce as much shale
oil as it wants, but its Gulf Coast refineries are geared toward
heavier kinds of
crude that can easily process
oil sand bitumen but aren't geared toward the lighter
crude coming out of, say North Dakota's Bakken play.
The pipeline would connect Canada's tar
sands with refineries on the Texas Gulf Coast that specialize in processing
heavy crude oil.
It adds that «approval or denial of the proposed project is unlikely to have a substantial impact on the rate of development in the
oil sands, or on the amount of
heavy crude oil refined in the Gulf Coast area.»
Oil sands are sand and rock material which contains crude bitumen, a heavy, viscous form of crude o
Oil sands are
sand and rock material which contains
crude bitumen, a
heavy, viscous form of
crude oiloil.
The refinery will feature state - of - the - art design, specifically for processing Alberta
oil sands heavy crude oil, and engineered to be the cleanest upgrading and refining site in the world.
TransCanada has said its shippers remain committed to the project, which would deliver diluted bitumen from Alberta's
oil sands to refineries on the Gulf Coast that are specifically equipped to process
heavy crude.
Genscape
oil analyst Carl Evans said that, even with
crude prices below $ 50 (U.S.) a barrel over the past two years,
heavy bitumen production in Canada's
oil sands region has continued to grow.
Experiments at the Philadelphia thermal depolymerization plant have converted
heavy crude oil, shale, and tar
sands into light oils, gases, and graphite - type carbon.
Nathan says high prices have made it increasingly economically viable to extract more unconventional forms of
oil, in particular the asphaltlike tar
sands (also known as
oil sand, or extremely
heavy crude oil) plentiful in northern Alberta, Canada.
The study, published Wednesday in the journal Nature, showed that the production of tar
sands and other
heavy oil — thick, highly viscous
crude oil that is difficult to produce — are a major source of aerosols, a component of fine particle air pollution, which can affect regional weather patterns and increase the risk of lung and heart disease.
Around two tons of tar
sand must be processed to produce one barrel of
heavy bitumen - based
crude oil.
Based on information and analysis about the North American
crude transport infrastructure (particularly the proven ability of rail to transport substantial quantities of
crude oil profitably under current market conditions, and to add capacity relatively rapidly) and the global
crude oil market, the draft Supplemental EIS concludes that approval or denial of the proposed Project is unlikely to have a substantial impact on the rate of development in the
oil sands, or on the amount of
heavy crude oil refined in the Gulf Coast area.
(Reuters)- Exxon Mobil on Sunday continued cleanup of a pipeline spill that spewed thousands of barrels of
heavy Canadian
crude in Arkansas as opponents of
oil sands development latched on to the incident to attack plans to build the Keystone XL line.
In an interview with The Globe and Mail editorial board, David Collyer, president of the Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers, said the Keystone XL line is needed to connect the Alberta
oil sands with refiners who have invested billions of dollar to upgrade their plants so that they can process
heavy grades of
crude.
It's known as the Keystone XL and it could pump millions more barrels of
heavy crude from Alberta, Canada's
oil sands mines to refineries along the U.S. Gulf Coast if the federal government greenlights it.
Perhaps not so ironically, the House vote on Terry's bill happened on the one - year anniversary of the Kalamazoo River in Michigan being fouled with 800,000 - plus gallons of
heavy crude from
oil sands.
Vast amounts of water and energy are needed to strip - mine and drill Canada's tar
sands deposits — a
heavy black substance mixed with
sand and clay — and turn the extracted bitumen into usable
crude oil.
The ExxonMobil pipeline that ruptured was carrying Wabasca
Heavy crude, a type of bitumen mined in Canada's
oil sands region.
In 2013, Global applied for a permit to allow it to handle
heavy tar
sands crude oil at the same facility.
Dilbit — the
heavy, solvent - laced tar
sands crude that oozed into the Kalamazoo River in 2010 and across Mayflower, Ark., in 2013 doesn't count, technically, as «
oil.»
A postscript to our post explaining that the
crude oil the Keystone XL pipeline would deliver is comparable to other heavy crudes already being refined in the U.S.: Oil sands crude would replace other heavy oils — most significantly, crude currently imported from Venezue
oil the Keystone XL pipeline would deliver is comparable to other
heavy crudes already being refined in the U.S.:
Oil sands crude would replace other heavy oils — most significantly, crude currently imported from Venezue
Oil sands crude would replace other
heavy oils — most significantly,
crude currently imported from Venezuela.
In its report, EPA seemingly compliments the State Department for confirming that Canadian tar
sands oil is carbon intensive when compared to other
heavy crudes, due to increased emissions associated with extracting and refining it.
Although the amount of convential
oil will continue to decline, there are estimated 10 - 15 trillion barrels of
oil equivalent in unconvential
oil which include
heavy and extra
heavy crude oils and the
oil shale and
sand.
The
crude that spilled is Wabasca
heavy oil and it's from Alberta near the area where there is
oil sands production.»
«Don't pick winners and losers among all the
heavy oil being produced in the world: Mexico, Nigeria, Venezuela, not to mention California
heavy crude that has a higher greenhouse - gas footprint than our tar
sands oil.»
They want the Obama administration to reject a Canadian company's application to construct the $ 7 billion, 1,702 - mile pipeline, which would carry
heavy crude from the
oil sands mines of Alberta to refineries along the Gulf Coast.
Instead of transporting
heavy crude from Canada's tar
sands, the pipeline would tap into the booming Bakken
oil fields of Montana and North Dakota.
The NAS study deals a blow to one central safety argument made by opponents of the $ 5.3 billion Keystone XL link — that the
heavier chemical components of so - called diluted bitumen make it more dangerous to ship — but made no attempt to address critics» second and more prominent concern, that a leak of
oil sands crude would pose unique challenges during cleanup as well as unique risks to marine environments.
A new study by the National Academy of Sciences found that «pipelines carrying
heavy Canadian
oil sands fuel are at no greater risk of a spill than those running conventional
crude.»