Not exact matches
Understandably
so: As the first - born of Prince William and Kate Middleton, little George is a direct
heir to the
throne.
So it's no surprise that some savvy business owners are tapping into the
heir -
to - the -
throne mania on both sides of the pond.
Unless they meant
to say
to commit adultery with his brothers wife
so she would claim the child was from her husband before death and therefore keep a
heir for the
throne??
So however you look at it, Jesus is the
heir to the
throne of David, both legally and spiritually.
So, having afternoon tea with the
heir to the
throne is unlikely
to have done it any harm among such voters.
The sole requirement for an
heir to the
throne (per the Act of Settlement 1701) is that they have
to be «
Heirs of [the monarch's] Body» and «such Issue
to the
Heirs of the Body»,
so basically the King / Queen's children and their subsequent offspring.
When she was born she obviously wasn't the queen (indeed she wasn't expected
to become queen in the future as her uncle was the
heir to the
throne),
so the government - through the local authority - issued a birth certificate.
So the international legitimacy that they get from UK support, and state visits from the
heir to the
throne, is just as powerful as any of the weapons they are buying.
So Prince William is getting married
to Kate Middleton next year, which means that by the end of 2012 we could well start having another generation of
heirs to the
throne.
She is the rightful
heir to the
throne,
so to speak, yet a very reluctant monarch, and fully conscious of her own limitations and, again, just
to repeat the salient point, since this is taking place in 1971 America: she's a woman and thus not truly considered an equal
to any man.
So Shrek sets out
to find another
heir to the
throne, one Arthur Pendragon (an earnest Justin Timberlake), a nerd at a medieval prep school across the ocean.
Applications such as that for access
to Prince Charles» «black spider memos» would be «doomed
to failure» if they were
to be made in future, according
to Mark Elliott, Reader in Public Law, Cambridge University, since «s 37 of the Freedom of Information Act 2000 was amended in 2010
so as
to render communications with the
heir to the
throne absolutely exempt from disclosure».