Sentences with phrase «held by other jurisdictions»

«Bob Myroniuk's appointment as president of ARELLO indicates the high esteem in which both he and the quality of self - regulation in Alberta are held by other jurisdictions across Canada and throughout North America,» says RECA chair Lynn Patrick.

Not exact matches

«That you Mohammed Ahmed Katun while serving as an Assistant Director, Pension Department of the Office of Head of Service of the Federation on or about the 14th day of August, 2009 within the jurisdiction of this Honourable Court, obtained by false pretences and with intent to defraud various sums of money amounting in the aggregate to N24, 660,675.00 (Twenty Four Million, Six Hundred and Sixty Thousand, Six Hundred and Seventy Five Naira only) from the Federal Government of Nigeria through the Pension Account held by the Office of the Head of Service of the Federation of Nigeria through fraudulent payments described as collective allowances into your bank account maintained with Ecobank Nigeria Limited (former Oceanic International Bank Plc) and thereby committed an offence contrary to Section 1 (1)(a) of the Advance Fee Fraud and Other Fraud Related Offences Act, 2006 and punishable under Section 1 (3) of the Advance Fee Fraud and Other Fraud Related Offences Act, 2006.»

In the event that any of the Terms of Use are held by a court or other tribunal of competent jurisdiction to be unenforceable, such provisions shall be limited or eliminated to the minimum extent necessary so that these Terms of Use shall otherwise remain in full force and effect.

If any provision of this Agreement is held invalid by a court or other tribunal with jurisdiction over the parties to this Agreement, that provision will be deemed to be restated to reflect as nearly as possible the original intentions of the parties in accordance with applicable law, and the remainder of this Agreement will remain in full force and effect.

In the event that any part of or all of any one or more of the provisions contained in this Agreement shall for any reason be held to be invalid, illegal or unenforceable in any respect by a court of competent jurisdiction, including binding arbitration, such invalidity, illegality or unenforceability shall not affect any other part of or all of any provision hereof, and this Agreement shall be construed as if such invalid, illegal or unenforceable part or all of the provision or provisions had never been contained herein.

Meanwhile, earlier this month, the Federal Court of Appeal agreed to hear an appeal by air passenger rights advocate Gabor Lukacs over whether the CTA has the jurisdiction to permit NewLeaf to operate without a licence, arguing that other companies that have operated under similar business models have been required to hold licences.

If any provision of these Terms of Use is held by a court or other tribunal of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, illegal or unenforceable for any reason, such provision shall be eliminated or limited to the minimum extent such that the remaining provisions of the Terms of Use will continue in full force and effect.

If any provision of these Terms of Use is held by a court or other tribunal of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, illegal or unenforceable for any reason, such provision shall be eliminated or limited to the minimum extent such that the remaining provisions of the Terms of Use will continue in full force and effect.

Although lawyers have long relied on banks to hold client trust funds, ethics regulators never weighed in on whether one bank was more secure than another; banks remained subject to regulation by the FDIC and other agencies because banking issues are beyond the scope of ethics regulators» jurisdictions.

In reaching this decision, the High Court undertook a review of past Singapore case law and legal commentary on the nature and purpose of Article 34 (2)(a)(iii), ultimately deciding that «as a matter of policy, to hold that Art 34 (2)(a)(iii) does not apply, where no other limb under Art 34 (2) would be engaged, would allow an arbitral tribunal to immunize its awards against judicial scrutiny by delivering its conclusions on both jurisdiction and merits in a single award», which would have been an «unsatisfactory result».

Judge Schechter held that the state in which the first proceeding was filed should normally assume jurisdiction, since DRL § 76 - e indicates that a court may not exercise jurisdiction if «at the time of the commencement of the proceeding, a proceeding concerning the custody of the child has been commenced in a court of another state having jurisdiction substantially in conformity with this article, unless the proceeding has been terminated or is stayed by the court of the other state.»

(a) that the Claimants contracted with the Defendants to purchase package holidays at the Club Aguamar Hotel and stayed at the Club Aguamar Hotel between the dates set out in the schedule to the order, and (b) that the Claimants suffered gastric or other illness of various durations, and / or personal injury, and / or distress, inconvenience, loss and damage as a result of improper performance of the provision of services under the holiday contract, in respect of which the Claimants hold the Defendant liable (i) under the Package Travel, Package Holidays and Package Tours Regulations 1992, and / or (ii) by reason of breaches of the said contracts of various dates for the provision of holidays, made in writing, and within the jurisdiction of this Court, and / or (iii) by reason of the Defendant's negligence during the said period, and / or (iv) by reason of the Defendant's misrepresentations made on various dates and inducung the Claimants to enter the said contracts for the provision of holidays.

Previously, in Announcement 30, a dividends recipient could qualify for a safe harbor and obtain BO status automatically if they were a company listed in the other contracting state or were directly or indirectly wholly owned by a company that is a resident of and listed in the other contracting state (excluding the situation wherein its shares were indirectly held through a company that was a resident of a third jurisdiction) and its dividends were derived from shares held by the listed company.

To offer students holding a bachelor degree recognized by the Quebec Bar a training that gives them the opportunity to be admitted to the Bars of common law provinces or other common law jurisdictions

The district judges shall be elected by the qualified electors of their respective districts, and shall hold office for the term of 6 years (excepting those elected at said first election) from and including the first Monday of January, next succeeding their election and qualification; provided, that the First Judicial District shall be entitled to, and shall have three district judges, who shall possess co-extensive and concurrent jurisdiction, and who shall be elected at the same times, in the same manner, and shall hold office for the like terms as herein prescribed, in relation to the judges in other judicial districts, any one of said judges may preside on the empanneling [empaneling] of grand juries and the presentment and trial on indictments, under such rules and regulations as may be prescribed by law.

«(1) If it appears to a coroner that, in the case of a body lying within his district, an inquest ought to be held into the death but it is expedient that the inquest should be held by some other coroner, he may request that coroner to assume jurisdiction to hold the inquest...»

The employment tribunal (ET) and the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) held that the ET did not have jurisdiction to consider an unfair dismissal claim because of the absence of a «substantial connection,» as set out by Lord Hoffmann in Daley v Serco Home Affairs Ltd and others [2010] All ER (D) 22 (Jan).

For example, Arizona allows dental assistants who process X-rays to hold a current certification from another U.S. jurisdiction, while the Texas State Board of Dental Examiners does not recognize radiology certificates issued by other states or U.S. jurisdictions.

REALTOR ® Members holding membership pursuant to Article III, Section 1 (C)(1)(ii) of this Constitution shall be Board Members of the local Board designated by them pursuant to that section of the Constitution and of the state association within whose jurisdiction that local Board is located and shall enjoy all of the rights, privileges and obligations, including compliance with the Code of Ethics, of other REALTOR ® Members of that state association and local Board except: obligations related to mandatory education, meeting attendance, or indoctrination classes or similar requirements; the right to use the term REALTOR ® in connection with their franchise firm's name; and the right to hold elective office in the local Board or state association.

These monies shall be held in escrow until the parties» rights to the escrow monies have been determined (i) by the written agreement of the parties, (ii) by order of a court of competent jurisdiction, or (iii) some other process to which the parties agree to in writing.