Sentences with phrase «held in joint names»

If your inheritance is cash and you deposit it into an account held in joint names with your spouse, you've commingled it.

The property can be held in joint names as joint tenants or tenants in common or in one party's name only either absolutely or in trust.

At para 51 of their lead judgment, Lady Hale and Lord Walker set down the following principles to be applied in determining beneficial shares where a family home is held in the joint names of a cohabiting couple without the benefit of any express declaration of trust:

Where you can increase your borrowing capacity if you apply for a loan together, your lender may only consider half of your rental income from other properties held in joint names.

Not exact matches

NRW Holdings emerged from a trading halt this morning with its share price nearly tripling in value on the back of news yesterday that its joint venture with Salini Impregilo had been named the preferred contractor for the $ 2 billion Forrestfield - Airport Rail link.

CDs: Hold property in joint tenancy with right of survivorship (or as tenancy by the entirety if owners are spouses), transfer title to a revocable living trust, or name a payable - on - death beneficiary.

Money Market Accounts: Hold property in joint tenancy with right of survivorship (or as tenancy by the entirety if owners are spouses), transfer title to a revocable living trust, or name a payable - on - death beneficiary.

Further, if a depositor has an account, in that depositor's name solely, and that depositor owes the Bank money, you agree that any money held in a joint account with that depositor and you may also be used to pay the debt.

A joint credit card is held in both names.

The common intention resulting trust arises where two parties share an intention that a property be jointly owned in light of joint contributions even though the property is held in the name of only one of the parties.

Whether the family home is in the sole name of the bankrupt, or in joint names, or held by a third party, is of crucial importance.

In the absence of such an agreement, the statutory matrimonial property regime applies, meaning joint ownership of all assets acquired during the marriage, regardless of the name under which they are held, but only if they were acquired by means of a joint contribution by both spouses.

The House of Lords commented that this was the first time it had been asked to rule on the effect of a property held legally in the joint names of a couple who had intended to make the property their home but without a declaration of trust relating to their respective beneficial interests.

There is a presumption that when one person transfers title to property gratuitously into the name of another (including into a joint tenancy) the transfer is not a gift, but the person receiving an interest in the title gratuitously, holds the title in trust (known as a resulting trust) for the transferor during her lifetime, and for her estate after death.

JOINT PROPERTY - property that is held in the name of more than one person.

79 DOS 99 Matter of DOS v. Pagano - disclosure of agency relationships; failure to appear at hearing; proper business practices; unauthorized practice of law; unearned commissions; vicarious liability; fraudulent practice; jurisdiction; ex parte hearing may proceed upon proof of proper service; DOS has jurisdiction after expiration of respondents» licenses as acts of misconduct occurred and the proceedings were commenced while the respondents were licensed; licensee fails to timely provide seller client with agency disclosure form prior to entering into listing agreement and fails to timely provide agency disclosure form to buyer upon first substantive contact; broker fails to make it clear for which party he is acting; broker violates 19 NYCRR 175.24 by using exclusive right to sell listing agreement without mandatory definitions of «exclusive right to sell» and «exclusive agency»; broker breaches fiduciary duties to seller clients by misleading them as to buyer's ability to financially consummate the transaction; broker breaches his fiduciary duty to seller by referring seller to the attorney who represented the buyers when he knew or should have known such attorney could not properly protect seller's interests; improper for broker to use listing agreements providing for broker to retain one half of any deposit if forfeited by buyer as such forfeiture clause could, by its terms, allow broker to retain part of the deposit when broker did not earn a commission; broker must conduct business under name as it appears on license; broker engaged in the unauthorized practice of law in preparing contracts for purchase and sale of real estate which did not contain a clause making it subject to the approval of the parties» attorneys and were not a form recommended by a joint bar / real estate board committee; broker demonstrated untrustworthiness and incompetency in using sales contract which purported to change the terms of the listing agreement to include a higher commission; broker demonstrated untrustworthiness and incompetency in using contracts of sale which were unclear, ambiguous, vague and incomplete; broker failed to amend purchase agreement to reflect amendment to increase deposit amount; broker demonstrated untrustworthiness in back - dating purchase agreements; broker demonstrated untrustworthiness in participating in scheme to have seller hold undisclosed second mortgage and to mislead first mortgagee about the purchaser's financial ability to purchase; broker demonstrated untrustworthiness by claiming unearned commission and filing affidavit of entitlement for unearned commission; DOS fails to establish by substantial evidence that respondent acted as undisclosed dual agent; corporate broker bound by the knowledge acquired by and is responsible for acts committed by its licensees within the actual or apparent scope of their authority; corporate and individual brokers» licenses revoked, no action taken on application for renewal until proof of payment of sum of $ 2,000.00 plus interests for deposits unlawfully retained

For example, if the other joint tenant dies before you do, then the property held in joint tenancy will be in your name alone and subject to your will.