Sentences with phrase «held prejudicial»

I have never demeaned a student nor held prejudicial viewpoints about any student or family; nor have I cast aspersions on anyone because of their profession.

They falsely think they are immune from holding prejudicial views.

Not exact matches

Contrary to stereotypes of online daters popular at the time of the study, and in direct contrast to the prejudicial views held by participants (especially the undergraduates) in the Donn and Sherman (2002) study, Brym and Lenton found that their sample of online daters was in fact more sociable offline than the general Canadian population.

The appeals court rejected Sienkowski's argument, holding that under Indiana law a party can not attack the validity of a verdict by juror testimony about jury deliberations unless it relates to (1) drug or alcohol use by any juror, (2) the question of whether extraneous prejudicial information was improperly brought to the jury's attention or (3) whether any outside influence was improperly brought to bear upon any juror.

The Ontario Court of Appeal has held that an employer many terminate an employee's employment for cause if the employee is «guilty of serious misconduct, habitual neglect of duty, incompetence, or conduct incompatible with his duties, or prejudicial to the employer's business, or if he has been guilty of wilful disobedience to the employer's orders in a matter of substance.»

The court also held that, although the convictions were quite old, they still provided some value to the jury, and while the evidence was prejudicial, it was not unfairly so.

Recently, the Divisional Court upheld a decision by Lederman J., whereby the court ordered the liquidation of a closely held corporation after finding that one of the shareholders acted oppressively; in other words, in a manner that was unfairly prejudicial to the other shareholders.

The conduct that has been held to be unfairly prejudicial is enumerated (though this is not an exhaustive list) and the remedies considered.

On the matter of oppression, the Court of Appeal noted that a petitioner must show it held a reasonable expectation with respect to the conduct of the affairs of the company, and that the reasonable expectation was disappointed by conduct that was oppressive or unfairly prejudicial.

The judge further held that the Appellant's conduct was oppressive or prejudicial to the Respondent, because the Appellant's efforts were directed at preventing the Respondent from putting forth a takeover bid.

«(3) If it appears to a coroner, either before he proceeds to hold an inquest or in the course of an inquest begun without a jury, that there is reason to suspect... (d) that the death occurred in circumstances the continuance or possible recurrence of which is prejudicial to the health or safety of the public or any section of the public he shall proceed to summon a jury...»

Madame Justice Simpson's statement «While I have no doubt that CREA will behave responsibly and abide by the terms on which its intervention has been allowed...» suggests that Madame Justice Simpson holds an already prejudicial mindset against CREA as an entity that typically does «not» behave responsibly unless bribed to do so.