Sentences with phrase «here by their relatives»

Not exact matches

Here's what Ryan Holmes, Hootsuite CEO, has to say about prioritizing tasks and managing expectations — «[Prioritizing what needs to be done] is round - robin, and by relative importance.»
The fact that this topic is popular on here may serve you well if this was expanded a bit more (which you just did with the couples angle, but perhaps looking at other data sources to help quantify what people's net worth is... and perhaps with respect to geography / cost of living... also how to maximize your relative net worth by moving to a low cost area — which I plan to do (abroad)!.
The relative strength line used here is calculated by diving the price of $ NEWR by the price of $ SPY.
One way to observe the effects of Fed - induced yield seeking speculation is to examine the value of financial assets held by households (the Z. 1 flow of funds data include nonprofit organizations here), relative to disposable household income.
The relativity that Newton here rejected is not the relativity that Einstein propounded; and although the Special Theory of Relativity has shown Newton to be wrong in some respects, and in particular has shown that we should not think of time by itself in complete independence of everything external, time is related to space, and also to velocity, contrary to Newton's opinion, it has not shown that time is relative in Newton's sense, and merely some numerical measure of process.
The willingness of President Bush (in his better moments) to spend money to shore up civil society — making it perhaps less necessary to spend money down the road, as the promise of the «ownership society» was fulfilled — was taken as an opportunity by those not invested in that «limited» project (I have in mind here both the conventional Republicans in the Bush White House and the pork - barrelling Republicans in the House and Senate) to open the federal purse with relative abandon.
Since the relative success of this proposal depends on the degree to which it does show how to resolve these three issues, and since the proposal is organized by the way the issues depend on one another, it is important to identify them clearly here at the outset:
All we need do here is point out that requirement (1) is met by the concrete and relative aspect of God and (2) is met by the abstract and changeless aspect.
I also can't agree with the «Classic Timeline» by science that says man is a relative latecomer and has only been here a small fraction ot the time that dinosaurs have.
They are not ultimately autonomous... but they have a relative autonomy, an autonomy always threatened by demonic forces precisely because God wills to preserve here a sphere for the free decision of faith which is the only kind of victory he wills to have....
Accordingly he is aware of these events as related to his bodily event «now - present here»; but his knowledge is thus mediate and relative — namely, he only knows other events through the medium of his body and as determined by relations to it.
The expression «actual world» is therefore comparable to the expressions «here», «yesterday», or «tomorrow»; such an expression is defined relative to a location, and its meaning changes with the location determined by an actual occasion (cf. PR 65 / 101f.).
Obviously Walcotts relatives are coming to his aid by disliking my comments here.
Holiday season is here and many families would now start travelling by car, bus or train to meet their relatives or friends in different parts of Los Angeles.
Why in fact, here on outer Mongolia, insist that the county executive actually pay any attention to the daily operations of this overwhelmingly dysfunctional county and their separate and coequally dysfunctional departments that fails to serve the elderly in great need and I have my own story on how this perennial smiley - face character's office easily accomplished such which resulted in the death of someone by clear and consistent neglect, and then you tell me then why should we not just continue to speculate as to why this man is either fit or not for running for Congress and I will tell you to take your «relative trivia» and shove it where neither smart phones or their apps «SHINE»!!
The relative weakness of gravity, illustrated here by a person's weight in different cosmic settings, is one of the great mysteries of physics.
Similarly, many studies that attempt to examine the co-variability between Earth's energy budget and temperature (such as in many of the pieces here at RC concerning the Spencer and Lindzen literature) are only as good as the assumptions made about base state of the atmosphere relative to which changes are measured, the «forcing» that is supposedly driving the changes (which are often just things like ENSO, and are irrelevant to radiative - induced changes that will be important for the future), and are limited by short and discontinuous data records.
My relatives all the time say that I am wasting my time here at net, except I know I am getting familiarity every day by reading such pleasant articles or reviews.
Here of some of the well - tested methods of dating used in the study of early humans: Potassium - argon dating, Argon - argon dating, Carbon - 14 (or Radiocarbon Posts about relative dating written by Mrs. Barton
Here, by contrast, he's trafficking in overly familiar tropes involving cops, grieving relatives, and criminal masterminds, and the idiocy sticks.
Of course, «fresh» is a relative term — it's nearly six months since I was wowed by Kelly Reichardt's studied, painterly Oregon Trail western (reviewed here)-LSB-...]
But whereas on those models the hat and outer portion are riveted together, here the hat and outer portion are connected by steel pins on which the aluminum and cast - iron portions, because of their differing expansion rates, can move relative to each other.
My relatives always say that I am wasting my time here at web, but I know I am getting experience every day by reading such pleasant articles or reviews.
My relatives every time say that I am killing my time here at web, but I know I am getting experience all the time by reading such fastidious articles or reviews.
My relatives always say that I am wasting my time here at web, however I know I am getting know - how every day by reading thes nice articles or reviews.
Here's a question relative to foreign rights: is there an outlet for books written in a foreign language by a U.S. author?
My relatives always say that I am wasting my time here at net, however I know I am getting knowledge everyday by reading such good articles.
Don't get tripped up by the word «relative» here — according to the IRS, it can include an unrelated person who passes the four following tests concerning residency, income, support and status.
This is a Guest Post by Alex @MacroOps which was originally posted on his site here: Why Equities Are NOT Overvalued: The Relative Risk - Premium Spread and reposted here with permission.
Here's a table listing the size of the net reinsurance reserve credits by subsidiary relative to the size of the surplus.
Here, Australia's first colonial home for an Aboriginal person also housed the memories of a close but distantly recollected relative, whose life - trajectory was fundamentally shaped by British arrival all those years ago, and not for the better.
Those artists» shadows loom large here, albeit refracted by the relative lateness of Zet's encounter with their influences and the way the events of 1989 forced him to revamp his approach to making art.
[Response I'm not sure what point you are trying to make here, but if you feel that you can only assess whether temperatures are changing by looking at 30 - year averages, consider the following: Global mean temperature anomalies (in degrees C, relative to 1961 - 90 reference period): 1885 - 1914: -0.35; 1915 - 1944: -0.18; 1945 - 1974: -0.07; 1975 - 2004: +0.21.
The main post here uses the Box data under the assumption that temperature differences determined by the same method are likely to be correct in terms of relative position, but when compared to records determined by other methods there may be biases (possibly unknown) which distort the result.
Is it the long - awaited, predicted and scientifically reasonable CO2 fertilization feedback effect on the oceans» vast biomass of CO2 - consuming cyanobacteria, albeit also driven by the (literally) «shit - loads» of nitrogen compounds the human race is also pumping into the oceans — thereby shifting sea surface albedos, reducing evaporation rates and troposphere relative humidities (ringing any bells here, bros)?
Also the spatial structure of changes in precipitation linked to altered surface temperature by convection can be improved by using higher resolution model experiments, although the relative gain here is generally small (Di Luca et al, 2012).
«The 2015 season here in Alaska is day by day progressing to be a truly outstanding fire year relative to our rather brief historical record of annual area burned (1950 is as far back as I feel provides rather accurate numbers),»
«The 2015 season here in Alaska is day by day progressing to be a truly outstanding fire year relative to our rather brief historical record of annual area burned (1950 is as far back as I feel provides rather accurate numbers),» Scott Rupp, a fire ecologist at the University of Alaska, Fairbanks, said in an email.
The irony here is that most climate change refutation is by those who do not have relative expertise on the issue (and in fact, even if they have a lot of «info,» have such a misunderstanding of what the actual issue is, as well as all of the relevant facts, their net understanding is very low.
As discussed here, relative to the years of greater ice loss in Greenland, the rate of sea level rise should have dropped by an additional 1.3 mm / year in 2014.
Two summers back, here within view of Colorado Springs» Waldo Canyon conflagration, I vividly recall some details: a) a hoisted ember astonishingly re-igniting things across a mile wide mountain lake, breaching the NE perimeter; b) our relative humidity, the day of the blaze, was so low the am weatherman uttering «you night as well say we have none;» c) the flown - in Commander, on camera and perhaps the best mind in all the world on matters such, describing never before witnessed probabilities for live ember re-ignitions, as «perhaps two out of three;» & d) that sad day's all - time record setting mark of 101 F., here @ 6,500 feet + elevations, in that astonishing summer where lower - 48 averages jumped by more than a single degree Fahrenheit in one realm - altering excursion.
Air with water vapor in it can be described by several important quantities (vapor pressure, relative humidity, humidity ratio, relative fugacity...), but the one we're interested in here is dew point.
One could argue with my representation of the Yamal series as a set reduced by delta > 2.5, but my point here is that I judge that by looking at the other Yamal factors with the highest deltas some insight might be gained as to the relative importance of the Yamal factors.
OK, well if thats the case then unless there is yet another factor at work here, the temperature profile offered by SoD (with the relative depth given of about 2m for about 90 % absorbtion) must primarily be due to impurities.
Linear regression provides some evidence of a small rapid negative response in the LW from water vapour, related largely to decreased relative humidity (RH), but the response here, too, is dwarfed by subsequent response to warming.
Here, we use an extensive dataset of 1,372 climate researchers and their publication and citation data to show that (i) 97 — 98 % of the climate researchers most actively publishing in the field surveyed here support the tenets of ACC outlined by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, and (ii) the relative climate expertise and scientific prominence of the researchers unconvinced of ACC are substantially below that of the convinced researchHere, we use an extensive dataset of 1,372 climate researchers and their publication and citation data to show that (i) 97 — 98 % of the climate researchers most actively publishing in the field surveyed here support the tenets of ACC outlined by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, and (ii) the relative climate expertise and scientific prominence of the researchers unconvinced of ACC are substantially below that of the convinced researchhere support the tenets of ACC outlined by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, and (ii) the relative climate expertise and scientific prominence of the researchers unconvinced of ACC are substantially below that of the convinced researchers.
The index is defined as the cumulative radiative forcing between the present add some chosen time horizon caused by a unit mass of gas emitted now, expressed relative to that for some reference gas (here CO2 is used).
Here, we use an extensive dataset of 1,372 climate researchers and their publication and citation data to show that (i) 97 — 98 % of the climate researchers most actively publishing in the field support the tenets of ACC outlined by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, and (ii) the relative climate expertise and scientific prominence of the researchers unconvinced of ACC are substantially below that of the convinced researchers.
As nobody here can do these kind of sums, which I learnt in school some 55 years ago, the output from burning gasoline by that formula is 54 % CO2 and 46 % H2O, and as none here is aware, the radiative forcing from atmospheric H2O relative to CO2 is about 2 - 4:1 in favour of H2O (Houghton, TAR and 2004), it is clear that burning fossil fuels is very beneficial to all of us, by generating both CO2 and H2O each of which has enormous benefits for us by increasing yields in agriculture, livestock, forestry, and fisheries.
No problems here Andrew, I don't think that you were believing that the oceans have a large effect (at maximum within one year), and I completely agree that the oceans are not a constant sink, as that is modulated by temperature... As the emissions are relative monotonely increasing in increase speed, one can expect a good match between a more variable independent cause and effect...
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z