Let's be honest and say that most people
here defending the position that «butter is good for you» are only agreeing with that statement because they want to believe it is.
Not exact matches
It is hard to see how Barth's ambivalent
position here can be
defended.
While the proportionality thesis might be true, it is probably of indeterminable truth value and is in any case not asserted or implied by the
position defended here.
If i
here Wenger
defending his defence still after another poor defensive display im going to go crazy, Monreal is not good enough to even play for us in his favoured
position never mind as a CB!
We go into more detail on the Serbian's slack effort at
defending here, with Matic jogging back and watching from a
position where he could neither close down Cesar Azpilicueta and prevent the assist, or mark Morata and prevent the goal.
However, rather than hearing what adult adoptees are saying
here (your daughter may feel the same way someday, our voices may be HERS), you struck back to
defend your
position.
Pay particular attention to the debuts, such a Chris Pavone's The Expats (Crown, March) or Thomas Mallon's Watergate (Delacorte, Feb; more about it
here; Digital review copies available from Edelweiss), and titles
positioned as breakouts, like
Defending Jacob, by William Landay (Delacorte, Jan; more about it
here; Digital ARC on Edelweiss).
Since so much of online investing relies on computers, it becomes difficult to
defend the
position that trade execution should cost what it does
here in Canada especially given what the entire industry in the US is now charging.
Have you suggested he come
here and
defend his
position?
I regularly debate issues with skeptics and rely on comments from the folks
here to
defend my
position — mostly successfully I might add.
I regularly debate > issues with skeptics and rely on comments from the folks >
here to
defend my
position....
Now your incoherence and ambiguity places you in an interesting / awkward
position, because now you can never
defend the climate science or your peers in the climate field who (like you) know AGW / ACC is a concern without being accused of
defending the alleged «dogma» — at least by many readers
here.
Perhaps offer them their own post
here at CE where they can explain and
defend their
position.
Here's a slightly more difficult
position to
defend: We don't know whether adaptation will be cheaper or easier than mitigation, but, since it is the only one likely to be acceptable to voters in a democratic society, it is the only morally acceptable one.
Here is a brief overview of the charges we handle and with decades of experience
defending clients against virtually every type of crime, attorney Michael O'Meara is well - equipped to explain what you are up against, review all your options, and craft a strategy that puts you in the best possible
position.
Here, however, the AGC was named as a respondent by ACJ Douglas, which meant that the AGC was placed in a fundamental conflict «between two public interest
positions — on the one hand,
defending the process and the Committee's decision... and, on the other, abandoning that responsibility in deference to the direct role of the AGC as Minister of Justice in the disciplinary process for superior court judges» (para. 7).