Not exact matches
which is certainly not a slight on the young french national player; like him or not, Sanchez has provided some real world - class performances for club and country in recent years... if you do this move, you need to really clean house or face some serious consequences for the foreseeable future... half measures are rarely rewarded, that's how we got
here... tear down the wall... we need to get rid of Giroud, not because he isn't a talented player, his skill - set simply doesn't
make sense if we hope to maximize the offensive potential of a quick passing, one - touch scheme... we need to evolve, like Barcelona, who realized you needed to have clinical finishers or face a mind - numbing future of horizontal passes and largely ineffective crosses... Barca went and got Suarez, even though they had Messi and Neymar on the roster (just imagine the possibilities — another in the litany of Wenger «what ifs»)... we need to be as clinical in the boardroom as on the pitch... accept nothing less or move on... personally I would move on from Welbeck, Giroud and Walcott, even Ox if he isn't all in... I think the most intriguing player might be Perez, which runs counter to the thoughts in my head when he arrived late last summer... we need a deep lying DM with quick feet and long ball potential, midfielders who can counter quickly even when they are spread out and 4 or 5 players who know how to attack the lanes (kind of a cross between Barca, Dortmund and Monaco)... this is seriously an achievable goal, one that logically should have been achieved quite a few years ago... did no one in the Arsenal organization see the
financial restructuring of the football universe... think of the players we could have had but we weren't willing to cough up the dough only for those individuals to have their value double or triple within a 12 to 24 month period... even if just from an investment perspective these «no deals» represent a failure of monumental proportions... only if you cared, of course
Janice said, «The move just
made financial sense, since we [her husband and herself] plan on staying
here for at least ten years.»
Even at those bargain prices, however, it still
makes good
financial sense to rent
here, with a median gross rent of only $ 1,267.
It
makes more
financial sense to rent
here, buying a home tends to be a decision based more on lifestyle and preferences than on the money.
You can see why so many people choose to rent
here, it
makes so much more
financial sense than purchasing a home, given the disparity between average rent and average home price.
The second thing is that the IOP is also
here to help ASIC develop
financial literacy materials that can benefit Indigenous consumers and that
make sense to Indigenous consumers.
Advice from
financial pundits to refrain from closing a credit card account
make sense here.
Only you can figure out what
makes the most
sense for your
financial situation, but
here are some ideas:
And I'm using «consumer» in a pejorative
sense here, namely one who passively (and happily) accepts programmatic decision -
making in most aspects of his or her life, such as refrigerators (e.g., handling cooling systems), cars (e.g., protection algorithms to eco-driving),
financial markets (e.g., the 2010 flash crash), movie preferences (e.g., the Netflix prize), and healthcare (e.g., knowing whether you are headed to the hospital), just to name a very few things.
I'm with Barry
here — taking into account the
financial situation of the employer
makes no
sense in principle.
It
makes more
financial sense to rent
here, buying a home tends to be a decision based more on lifestyle and preferences than on the money.
Even at those bargain prices, however, it still
makes good
financial sense to rent
here, with a median gross rent of only $ 1,267.
Here are my top four reasons why it
makes TONS of
sense to hire a
financial specialist as part of your divorce team:
Here's 5 reasons why we think it
makes financial sense...