Not exact matches
The
logic here is
simple: If what got the stock market to near - record levels is no longer working, where is there to go but down?
I shall argue
here that though the temptation to reduce life and mind to «matter» is quite understandable today given the amazing advances of molecular biology and brain science, it is, nevertheless, a temptation that must be avoided in the name of
simple logic.
«
Logic is not your strong suit,» --------- — Actually, the logic here was quite si
Logic is not your strong suit,» --------- — Actually, the
logic here was quite si
logic here was quite
simple.
Our basic
logic here is
simple.
From a
simple rule of the
logic of analogies, there is none
here.
The
logic here is
simple: if the interest rate on your debt is higher than the rate of return you'd get on the investment, tackle the debt first.
I hope you are following my
logic here — nothing is as
simple as it appears to be.
The issues
here are
simple: 1) there isn't a true ending 2) nothing still makes any sense 3) everything is questionable In terms of storytelling, it isn't like bloodborne where you are given depth in lore through establishing a large list of facts that help you understand the history and
logic of everything.
The fact that neither you nor Rodger nor apparently anyone else posting
here is willing to accept that very
simple logic says a lot about the confirmation bias that appears to dominate mainstream climate science generally.
V: The fact that neither you nor Rodger nor apparently anyone else posting
here is willing to accept that very
simple logic...
The
logic is so
simple that it sometimes seems this doesn't need to be said, but growing up with a dysfunctional sense of what a «normal city» looks like can make something logical invisible, so
here's the key point: A city, practically by definition, is a lot of people living in a relatively small area.
:) I mean it in a good way
here... but it's not a physics paper... it's a statistical methods paper attempting to show that any reasonable analysis of the AGW signal can not begin with GCM verification (circular
logic) or
simple signal processing (because there are a series of complicated longer - term climate oscillations at work).
OK,
here's some
simple logic to do it.
Here are a few examples of how men embrace
simple things like sprawling beards, even when
logic is nowhere in evidence to the casual observer.