Islam: To reject the Islam as
a heretical doctrine, it is not necessary to read the Koran, because it is publically known that the Islam rejects the Trinity and the devine sonship of Jesus Christ.
The polytheist is an ally and possess a Christian world view though he hold
heretical doctrines of worship.
The Crouches are known for being indifferent to correct doctrine and / or teaching false doctrine, and for inviting guests onto their televsion programs who promote
heretical doctrines.
2 Peter 2 But also [in those days] there arose false prophets among the people, just as there will be false teachers among yourselves, who will subtly and stealthily introduce
heretical doctrines (destructive heresies), even denying and disowning the Master Who bought them, bringing upon themselves swift destruction.
Not exact matches
On the contrary, on the one occasion when Luther's theological proposals received a halfway careful hearing from a representative of the Roman Church, at his meetings with Cardinal Cajetan in Augsburg in 1518, the conclusion reached was that his
doctrine of justifying faith was not obviously
heretical or in clear opposition to the tradition of the Church.
And until Calvinism does away with it's inherent Nestorianism (which reemerged recently when a group of Calvinists attempted to redefine the Trinity in order to make it compatible with their new
doctrine of «complementarianism», you look pretty hypocritical saying that Catholic theology is «at least in parts
heretical».
«But doesn't the fact that those
heretical groups faded from history tell us something about the worth of their
doctrines?»
I personally find those that challenge the fundamentals of the gospel to be
heretical, not those that question non-essential
doctrine.
Some Sufis even denounced the Pillars of Islam and taught that union with God is the aim of Islam, a pantheistic
doctrine which is
heretical.
Such a history does not only exist because a very great deal of time and theological development and clarification was needed in some cases before the Church's awareness of its belief had finally fought its way to a clear realization that such and such a definite
doctrine of the Church is really contained in divine revelation, is a genuine expression of what has always been globally believed or an obligatory defence against
heretical misinterpretation of what has been handed down.
The revealed account of creation mentions only the «dust of the earth» as material cause; there is no certain scientific
doctrine to the contrary; therefore there is no reason to abandon a «literal» interpretation of Genesis, all the more so as the history of the theory of evolution shows that this tends to be regarded in a radically materialistic way as a complete explanation of man's origin, and so involves theses which are certainly
heretical.
Some Christians do indeed welcome those ««
heretical» opinions,» because, in their view, they serve to correct
doctrine by its proper biblical standard.
I guess, the
doctrine of the Copts is
heretical.
However, I think holding a
heretical view, as I defined it as denial of an essential
doctrine, is to deny the Savior and his salvation.
But this
doctrine was taken for granted by basically all Christians (except some
heretical sects) for more than a millennium prior to the Reformation era.
Have you ever been in a church where a leader quoted 2 Timothy 4:3 - 4, and then proceeded to show why most other churches are
heretical or spiritually immature because they can not endure sound
doctrine, but instead, heap up for themselves teachers who give them what their itching ears want to hear?
Tragically, evangelical theology has largely ignored this
doctrine, and thus our theology has been unbiblical — indeed, even
heretical — on this important point.
Interestingly, several of the
doctrines we now hold firmly as «sound biblical truth» were at first (and for about 200 years) considered by the majority of people to be «
heretical.»
Secondly, and most importantly, the
doctrine is always mentioned in the context of a church leader trying to defend the church against a teaching which they considered
heretical.
What were some of the
doctrines of today that were considered
heretical in the early church?
And I might add to this, ``... or because they hold to some
doctrine which we think is
heretical.»
But here is what I don't get, Rhonda: You feel that «
heretical teachings» and «false
doctrines» must be «dealt with».
Certainly there is a tradition that the defeated
heretical monks held a rival council of ten thousand members, known as the Great Council, and drew up a different recension of the scriptures which among other things, according to the Dipavamsa, 1 «broke up the sense and
doctrine in the five Nikayas,» and «rejecting some portions of the Sutta and the profound Vinaya, they made another counterfeit Sutta and Vinaya.»