Sentences with phrase «hierarchy where»

His photography is «democratic» in its resistance to hierarchy where, as noted by the artist, «no particular subject is more or less important than another.»

Creating multiple reflections of their own forms, the viewer's body and the space of the gallery in which they hang, they show us a universe without hierarchy where an infinite number of unique, true histories of the world can coexist.

- Using the environment to block / trap / weaken monsters is a great addition, including the new monster hierarchy where monsters can fight one another.

Dogs live and hunt communally and their survival strategy is a tight - knit pack with a hierarchy where every individual knows who is boss to it and who it can boss around; they catch prey larger than themselves and the catch is shared with others.

But Schools Week reported in 2015 that the scheme received a «nervous reaction» from some heads, who said it could create a «formal hierarchy where supporting other schools is seen as kudos».

But the point is there is only one place on the hierarchy where the entire system collapses if one person fails and its at that principal position.

Teacher Powered Schools strive for a «flattened» hierarchy where teachers run the school, not only making decisions such as what curriculum to use, but having a true say in the big decisions like staff hiring, budgets and school mission and vision.

None of these speak of a hierarchy where some are more called or «sent» than others, which is what was commented on in a previous post.

«I like this notion of all of us becoming experience ambassadors and instead of having a hierarchy where somebody at the top dictates what's going to happen for the entire customer experience, we have people iterating constantly on the portion of the customer experience that they're responsible for and I think that's a huge culture shift,» said Drake.

Cairns also argued that the single sex environment was bad for boys as they «tend to create their own artificial hierarchies where only those in the 1st XV rugby team are truly valued», in contrast to co-education schools where «girls admire the boys who dance, sing or act».

The UK commission for Employment and Skills suggests that by 2030 workplaces will move towards flattened hierarchies where individuals have increased responsibility and autonomy.

There are plenty of species of animal that do have social hierarchies where the strongest or most aggressive male rises to the top, such as gorillas and chimpanzees, but canids like wolves and dogs generally don't operate like this.

Plenty of animal species do have social hierarchies where the strongest male rises to the top, but canids like wolves and dogs generally don't operate like this.

I think that's basically what I was talking about — there are a lot of these hierarchies where money shoots out from.

Not exact matches

«Your brain is wired not only to figure out where you sit in the professional and social pecking order against others, but to reinforce your position in that pecking order,» says writer Steve Errey, who continues: «When you get wrapped up in establishing or maintaining status, the moment your place in the hierarchy drops you're going to feel pretty horrible... Don't get into the status game — there are no winners.»

The co-founders established as flat a hierarchy as they could, with an open - concept office where high - ranking management sit next to new hires.

And just as Airbnb and Uber have the landscape of accommodations and local transport unrecognizable to something from only a decade prior, we will eagerly await what the future might look like, in a world where verified and trusted interactions between individuals become as could change the face of institutional hierarchy as we know it.

While Peter's eponymous principle presents a fascinating theory of why all hierarchies are destined for disaster, it also applies in the entrepreneurial world, where organizations are quite a bit flatter.

Where the first two are intrinsic and enforced by all, rules are extrinsic and enforced through hierarchy.

In a world in where the social contract between employer and employees has broken down (careers are no longer created within one company, but across several organizations), where hierarchies have been replaced by networks, where products have been replaced by solutions, and where agility has replaced bureaucratic coordination — the way you lead has to change.

Gone is the dominator hierarchy (the structure where bosses hold power over their subordinates).

Give an example of a business situation where the norms of hierarchy are not followed, (by a foreigner who doesn't understand), and explain how they should be followed according to the norms of Singapore.

Less obvious, but perhaps, arguable would be older and younger siblings where the older sibling has more perceived power, however it could take many forms, and might be argued that any close familial relationship is likely to develop a hierarchy of power, or pecking order, that invalidates any equal position in which to make a valid consent.

So while, when he focuses on the social context of suffocating patriarchy, Le Rider is no innovator, he is far more alert than many feminist interpreters in seeing how the cure - liberation from hierarchy and patriarchally assigned roles - could easily double back on itself, leaving, as it were, seven devils in the cleanly swept house where previously there had been but one.

From his website, I perceive that he is getting very full support from the American hierarchy in more than just fine words: he already, for instance, has a «principal Church», in other words, a sort of cathedral, which was immediately designated as such on the erection of the US Ordinariate, by the Cardinal Archbishop of Houston, Texas, where he will be based.

In a true democracy, a doctrine of pluralism may be a way of safeguarding the rights of minorities; in a hierarchy, however, where authority proceeds from a Will not constituted by any part of the population, «pluralism» is often a code word for the project of giving political power the ascendancy over legitimate authority.

Consequently, there is no need to draw the traditional lines of ontological discontinuity where there is utter material homogeneity, that is, where atoms and molecules cut across all the former boundaries in the hierarchy of beings.

These gods of the boutique can come from anywhere — native North American religion, the Indian subcontinent, some Pre-Raphaelite grove shrouded in Celtic twilight, cunning purveyors of otherwise worthless quartz, pages drawn at random from Robert Graves, Aldous Huxley, Carl Jung, or that redoubtable old Aryan, Joseph Campbell — but where such gods inevitably come to rest are not so much divine hierarchies as ornamental étagères, where their principal office is to provide symbolic representations of the dreamier sides of their votaries» personalities.

If we make a demand on the Church, we must always examine precisely whether it is really addressed to the hierarchy and its members as such, or to the Church, that is, to all of us Christians, and precisely in the sphere where the official Church does not teach and act authoritatively.

If we succeed in changing the hierarchies we have imposed on people according to their race and color and sex, then we can have a world of persons, of horizontal relationship rather than hierarchy, a world of expression rather than oppression, where «there are no more distinctions between Jew and Greek, slave and free, male and female,» where we are all «one in Christ Jesus.»

This is true both in churches where authoritative (and sometimes authoritarian) church hierarchies supposedly have great power to control what happens in the local church, and in decentralized communions in which the local minister has the final say.

Matthew Levering's analysis suffers from a fundamental flaw but one that has its intellectual origins in longstanding American constitutional battles and thus has become so completely ingrained in the modern American psyche that it seems part of the natural order of things: Where there is a difference between two classes, there must, ipso facto, exist a hierarchy between them.

That alone would provide a tremendous amout of money for these good purposes and also show that the Catholic Church hierarchy is putting THEIR money where their mouth is and provide an excellent example to Christians everywhere.

The reader can easily see where the recurring theme of syneisactism and the attendant characterizations of the Catholic hierarchy eventually will lead as the account reaches the modern era and today's Church.

True maturity, one might venture, lies in the middle way where hierarchy, structure, law and ritual, as well as personality, initiative, inspiration and group dynamics are all acknowledged and valued and held in balance.

The type of services where you sit back and don't participate, or the types of churches with leaderships, committees, and hierarchies, may not be able to minister well to everybody.

It can take the form of hierarchy similar to that which exists in an individual person, where there is a unique governing center coordinating the relationality of all its parts, or it can build upon its ontic base of intersubjectivity and act through consensual modes.

Quite the contrary: where Elizabethans were unanimous in their worldview (hierarchy, Great Chain of Being, immortality of the soul, etc.), Shakespeare was one with his contemporaries.

It is easy to think that there is a sort of calling hierarchy, where people in ministry have a godlier calling than those of us who have normal jobs.

There seems to still be a hierarchy, even within progressivism, where women's issues are not seen as important enough.

Could one not envision a community where such different functions, freely chosen, were similarly valued and not the ingredients in a complex hierarchy of wealth and status?

Coming as he does from a region where the Church's validity among the poor has been damaged by the competition between the traditional hierarchy and the less - than - orthodox liberationists, the Pope's concern is understandable.

Over 150 years ago in the chapel at Oscott where the Pope will, God - willing, have his parting colloquium with the Bishops of England and Wales, Newman celebrated the re-establishment of the Catholic hierarchy in this country.

Within this hierarchy is built the marital structure of complementarianism, where the man and his wife are valued as equals before God, but when it comes to questions of authority, the man is the head and the woman is his support and follower.

God operates in a hierarchy, where men answer to him and wives answer to their husband and are submissive to their husbands.

Similar gradations are found in the multi-leveled hierarchy, where with each step upwards the relative importance of the constraints decreases and the number of choices increases.

But people are likely to think that big brother is supposed to solve every problem not just the big ones, and are therefore likely to amend their theory by trying to establish a hierarchy of need to determine where big brother should exhaust his effort.

How can I learn to share power unless I live in a community where hierarchy is unnatural?

The feudal kingdom was translated into the hierarchy of marriage and parenthood, where women and children were subject to the domestic king.

How does AD work and where does it fit in the hierarchy of food recovery techniques?