Of course, it is likely a number of managers with
high Active Share portfolios underperformed their benchmarks while others outperformed.
It would be wrong for investors to interpret the results in a manner leading them to conclude all managers with
high Active Share portfolios will beat their benchmarks.
Not exact matches
In a 2014 monograph Martijn Cremers and Ankur Pareek argued that it is the combination of
high active share with low
portfolio turnover that produces the opportunity for outperformance1.
In his view,
high active share means concentrated
portfolios that can have
high over-performance or
high under - performance, but it does not reliably predict which.
An
active share of 94.2 is extremely
high for a fund with a large cap
portfolio.
This process results in a benchmark agnostic,
high active share, all - cap
portfolio of 30 - 50 businesses which tends to behave differently from traditional Emerging Market indices.
He is often quoted regarding his expertise in
high active share, concentrated
portfolios.
This purposely distances us from relative benchmark
portfolio management styles leading to
high active share.»
High active share indicates management which is providing a
portfolio that is substantially different from, and independent of, the index.