Not exact matches
The man a
high court judge notoriously dismissed as an unreliable witness, whose famously fastidious attention to detail was such that when it
came to making the case for the most serious foreign policy
decision since Suez, he was perfectly content to sling out some 12 - year - old guff he'd lifted straight off the internet.
«We
came together as a party to review the
decision of the Federal
High Court (
Court of Appeal) on our party.
Bharara has already seen his record on Albany corruption tained after his
high - profile convictions of former Senate Majority Leader Dean Skelos (R - Nassau County) and ex-Assembly Speaker Sheldon Silver (D - Manhattan) were overturned on appeal as a result of a U.S. Supreme
Court decision that
came out after their trials that limited what is considered bribery.
And since the March guidance, another relevant
decision came down from the
high court: In Alice Corp. v. CLS Bank International, the judges invalidated a software patent by ruling that a method of financial analysis is an unpatentable «abstract idea,» even when implemented on a computer.
It's one of three
decisions coming out of the
high court on Monday.
The closest the
high court came to addressing the Blaine Amendments was its
decision in Locke v. Davey (2004).
«Given some of the
decisions that have
come out of the
Court of Appeal which have required pretty high standards for employers in terms of drafting employment agreement language, it was encouraging to see the court unanimously uphold the language that the parties negotiated in this case,» says Susan Crawford, of Crawford Chondon & Partners LLP who represented Money Mart in Kielb v. National Money Mart Com
Court of Appeal which have required pretty
high standards for employers in terms of drafting employment agreement language, it was encouraging to see the
court unanimously uphold the language that the parties negotiated in this case,» says Susan Crawford, of Crawford Chondon & Partners LLP who represented Money Mart in Kielb v. National Money Mart Com
court unanimously uphold the language that the parties negotiated in this case,» says Susan Crawford, of Crawford Chondon & Partners LLP who represented Money Mart in Kielb v. National Money Mart Company.
When it
comes to information published on the web site, the only information warranting a
higher integrity requirement are
court decisions and case information.
Even though Bangladeshi
courts have
come to conflicting
decisions as to the scope of the Act, there is a
decision of the Appellate Division of the Supreme
Court of Bangladesh restricting the application of the Act [10], and pursuant to Article 111 of the Constitution of the People's Republic of Bangladesh, a
decision of the Appellate Division of the Supreme
Court is binding upon the
High Court Division and other
courts subordinated to it.
If a case
comes before the
Court that does deal with Convention rights, say for instance a freedom of assembly challenge is brought against Ealing Council's
decision to ban protestors outside the Marie Stopes clinic, then, following on from the logical conclusion of this Judgment, the
High Court will need to be reviewing the PSPO at a
higher level of scrutiny.
The
High Court's
decision to reject BT's plan to reduce pensions benefits
comes as good news for 84,000 former and existing BT employees that joined the telecoms firm after it was privatised in 1984.
In that article, Y. Edinam Cofie discussed a
High Court decision in which Justice Bright Mensah
came to the conclusion that a «person» as referred to in the Legal Professions Act (Act...
The second challenge was dismissed in October 2014 by the
High Court, but permission was given for the
decisions in both Unison 1 and Unison 2 to
come before the
Court of Appeal.
Similarly, in Chantiers de L'Atlantique SA v Gaztransport & Technigaz SAS [2011] EWHC 3383, the
High Court dismissed a challenge to an award, despite making a finding that there had been fraud in the arbitration, because the claimant was unable to establish that the tribunal probably would have
come to a different
decision if there had been no fraud.
In that article, Y. Edinam Cofie discussed a
High Court decision in which Justice Bright Mensah
came to the conclusion that a «person» as referred to in the Legal Professions Act (Act 32) referred only to a lawyer and did not cover a law firm.
In such cases as this one, there are even two infringement rulings (regional
court and higher regional court) prior to the Federal Patent Court's decision; in other cases, the Federal Patent Court's decision comes in just about in time for the appellate hea
court and
higher regional
court) prior to the Federal Patent Court's decision; in other cases, the Federal Patent Court's decision comes in just about in time for the appellate hea
court) prior to the Federal Patent
Court's decision; in other cases, the Federal Patent Court's decision comes in just about in time for the appellate hea
Court's
decision; in other cases, the Federal Patent
Court's decision comes in just about in time for the appellate hea
Court's
decision comes in just about in time for the appellate hearing.
So am very pleased when they
come out bitterly complaining about DJ's
decision, threaten an appeal, where is this tin - pot county
court anyway, should have gone to High Court, etc
court anyway, should have gone to
High Court, etc
Court, etc etc..
And since it was only last month that the
highest court in the land told us that the «social facts» had changed from when Rodriguez v. British Columbia (Attorney General), [1993] 3 S.C.R. 519 became law, it
came as a surprise to some that the Margot Bentley
decision came down the way it did.
Commissioner Gooda said the
decision came 18 years after the historic
High Court decision in Mabo which found that native title existed on Murray Island, and almost nine years after the Torres Strait Regional Sea Claim was filed in the Federal
Court.