I don't think anyone looks injured they are just playing a team that doesn't make it easy to get
high danger scoring chances.
Not exact matches
Charging purchases is certainly convenient and you can even
score big rewards, like cash back or airline miles but there's always the
danger of racking up
high - interest debt.
(«
High -
danger»
scoring chances from right in front of the net favored Washington even more, 17 - to - 5 at five - on - five.)
But the Capitals again had a solid edge in five - on - five
scoring chances in Game 3 (including a 14 - 9 advantage in the
high -
danger areas, per Natural Stat Trick).
Shots were way up,
scoring chances were way up,
high danger chances way up (and chances against were way down), and consequently goals were up.
I believe they have an absurd 65 % share of
scoring chances or
high danger chances at 5s.
The pairing finished with 65.5 percent of the five - on - five shot attempts taken when they were on the ice, 60 percent of the
scoring chances, and 57.1 percent of the
high danger chances.
The Penguins have pretty slight advantages in possession stats across the board, from total shot attempts to overall
scoring chances to «
high danger»
scoring chances.
*** Once upon a time around Game 4 - 5, despite the Caps heavily owning shots and shot attempts, the
high -
danger scoring chances were close to even.
The authors suggest that other states learn from «the
danger of relying on statewide test
scores as the sole measure of student achievement when these
scores are used to make
high - stakes decisions about teachers and schools as well as students.»
In a nutshell, the
danger is that schools with
high absolute achievement
scores will more easily be seen as successful, while those with low achievement metrics will be seen as unsuccessful.
I've previously posted about studies that have found that the laser - like focus on raising student test
scores often identifies teachers who are good at doing that, but those VAM - like measures tend to short - change educators who are good at developing Social Emotional or «non-cognitive skills» (see More Evidence Showing The Dangers Of Using High - Stakes Testing For Teacher Evaluation; Another Study Shows Limitations Of Standardized Tests For Teacher Evaluations; Study Finds Teachers Whose Students Achieve High Test Scores Often Don't Do As Well With SEL Skills and SEL Weekly Up
scores often identifies teachers who are good at doing that, but those VAM - like measures tend to short - change educators who are good at developing Social Emotional or «non-cognitive skills» (see More Evidence Showing The
Dangers Of Using
High - Stakes Testing For Teacher Evaluation; Another Study Shows Limitations Of Standardized Tests For Teacher Evaluations; Study Finds Teachers Whose Students Achieve
High Test
Scores Often Don't Do As Well With SEL Skills and SEL Weekly Up
Scores Often Don't Do As Well With SEL Skills and SEL Weekly Update).